06-09-2003 10:38									#1
	Guns, Germs, and Steel Got spare money?

For my English and history courses (which are somewhat integrated) we're reading Jared Diamond's Guns, Germs, and Steel. I've already read it, and I think it's and AWESOME choice for integrated Enlish and history. I loved the book.

	06-09-2003 10:42									#2
	Help yourself to an AD-FREE life

Great!

	06-09-2003 12:20									#3
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

fabulous book -- I own a copy myself

	06-09-2003 12:25									#4
	Remove this text

I like how he merges the motifs with a complacent blend of post-modern history with amicable animosity.

	06-09-2003 12:39									#5
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

so much talk about this book

just give me the cliff's notes so I can get the jist of it

	06-09-2003 13:05									#6
	Increase Your PM Length

Some good ideas, but the execution is a bit sloppy at times, with a lot of belaboring the obvious. You can tell that he isn't a trained historian. But the bit where he looks at where domesticated animals/plants come from and the conclusions he draws from that are pretty itneresting.

For a much better look at the germs bit of the three read Plagues and Peoples by Willian McNeill which is absolutely amazing.

	06-09-2003 17:18									#7
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

1. Huge amount of repetition.
2. Politically correct (and silly) contradictory comments in the introduction (or is it first chapter?)
3. Used to advance a viewpoint but never proves that viewpoint. (i.e. proving significant cause from factor X, does not disprove significant cause from factor Y, especially in the social sciences where there is so much damn noise anyway.)
4. No footnotes. Pathetic. Lots of popular books have footnotes. Read A Beautiful Mind or The Bell Curve or On Modern War. These are all popular NYT bestseller nonfiction books. Full of footnotes.
5. (troll) Apppeals to pseudo-intellectuals and should never have gotten the Pulitzer. Very trendy and overrated.

	06-09-2003 17:56									#8
	Remove this text

quote: Originally posted by TCO 1. Huge amount of repetition. 2. Politically correct (and silly) contradictory comments in the introduction (or is it first chapter?) 3. Used to advance a viewpoint but never proves that viewpoint. (i.e. proving significant cause from factor X, does not disprove significant cause from factor Y, especially in the social sciences where there is so much damn noise anyway.) 4. No footnotes. Pathetic. Lots of popular books have footnotes. Read A Beautiful Mind or The Bell Curve or On Modern War. These are all popular NYT bestseller nonfiction books. Full of footnotes. 5. (troll) Apppeals to pseudo-intellectuals and should never have gotten the Pulitzer. Very trendy and overrated.

I agree with a lot of this, though I'm glad the book was written as it has stimulated a lot of discussion about history amongst people who normally never think much about it. Sometimes I think a Pulitzer prize is synonymous with sucks though. It's certainly a completely random prize, and means basically nothing insofar as deciding what might be of high quality or not.

	06-09-2003 18:55									#9
	Remove this text

Chapter 1, TCO. He goes on and on about how you can't really compare IQ's across cultures and differing levels of "advancement", and then lays the following bombs on his reader:

quote: In fact, as I shall explain in a moment, modern "Stone Age" peoples are on the average probably more intelligent, not less intelligent, than industrialized peoples. Paradoxical as it may sound... white immigrants to Australia do not deserve the credit usually accorded to them for building a literate industrialized society ... From the very beginning of my work with New Guineans, they impressed me as being on the average more intelligent, more alert, more expressive, anc more interested in things and people around them than the average European and America is... It is easy to recognize two reasons why my impression that New Guineans are smarter than Westerners may be correct... this effect surely contributes a non-genetic component to the superior average mental function displayed by New Guineans. That is, in mental ability New Guineans are probably genetically superior to Westerners...

Hell, Diamond should've prefaced Chapter one with "I am not a racist, but..."

	06-09-2003 18:57									#10
	Tired of ads?

You obviously don't understand what he was saying. The immigrants to Australia obviously built a literate industrialized society, as they were the only one's with written language or industry!

	06-09-2003 19:15									#11
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Likely... it's been a while since I've read the book and I just referenced the first chapter w/o going through the rest. But, still, it's a silly and inflammatory thing to say.

	06-09-2003 19:16									#12
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

No it isn't. It's completely obvious. He then devotes the rest of the book to explaining WHY it was the immigrants that had the written word and industry.

	06-09-2003 19:22									#13
	Got spare money?

Now I'm confused. Diamond says in Chapter 1:

quote: white immigrants to Australia do not deserve the credit usually accorded to them for building a literate industrialized society

And you say that Diamond argues later in the book that they do deserve the credit? Did they or did they not build a "literate industrial society"? If they did, Diamond's quote in chapter one is dumb. If they didn't (and the historical record does more than suggest otherwise), then Diamond is richly deserving of his Pulitzer and probably needs a few other awards as well for his total historical re-assessment of the causes of Australia's growth into a LIS.

	06-09-2003 19:25									#14
	Inflate your Upload Space

He claims genetic mental superiority of New Guineans, then neglects to examine genetic intelligence patterns anyewhere else (and implicitly and certainly in terms of how people use his work) argues against any patterns of genetic intelligence difference by population.

	06-09-2003 19:25									#15
	Tired of ads?

No, he doesn't argue that they deserve the credit - he shows WHY they had a literate industrialized society and the aborigines didn't. He explains WHY Europe advanced further than other places, using simply geography and plant and animal stuff.

	06-09-2003 19:38									#16
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

Which is another problem I have with the book (he says from his hazy recollection of it): He ascribes no (or little) credit to the development of civilizations to the development of ideas. It's all about geography and biology, with no room for human intellect and will.

Of course, that's just me: I have a problem with "one size fits all" explanations for human behaviour and development.

	06-09-2003 19:42									#17
	Full PM-box? Change here!

He claims genetic intellectual superiority of New Guineans.

	06-09-2003 19:43									#18
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

should I buy it?

	06-09-2003 19:44									#19
	Full PM-box? Change here!

Buy a used copy.

	06-09-2003 19:44									#20
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by TCO He claims genetic intellectual superiority of New Guineans.

As I quoted above.

	06-09-2003 19:49									#21
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

Used copies put their lips onto things and create a vacuum in their mouth, ie they suck.

	06-09-2003 20:03									#22
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Elitist.

	06-09-2003 20:04									#23
	Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Yeah I prefer own books, new and all.

What is GGS actually about? What part of history? From what point of view? Which obvious political leaning?

	06-09-2003 20:21									#24
	Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote: Originally posted by TCO He claims genetic intellectual superiority of New Guineans.

He says there are selective pressures for intelligence among undeveloped societies, whereas there are selective pressures for resistance to disease among developed societies.

	06-09-2003 20:21									#25
	Tired of ads?

quote: Originally posted by Ecthelion should I buy it?

Yes.

	06-09-2003 20:23									#26
	Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

please remember to also answer my above detail questions

	06-09-2003 20:24									#27
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by skywalker He says there are selective pressures for intelligence among undeveloped societies, whereas there are selective pressures for resistance to disease among developed societies.

Therefore:

quote: That is, in mental ability New Guineans are probably genetically superior to Westerners

	06-09-2003 20:25									#28
	Remove this text

quote: Originally posted by Ecthelion Yeah I prefer own books, new and all. What is GGS actually about? What part of history? From what point of view? Which obvious political leaning?

GGS is about *all* of history. It provides a broad scope. It has not obvious political leanings (that I noticed).

GGS provides an explanation of why some races/cultures/nationalities became developed, industrialized nations, whereas others didn't. It provides an explanation of this based SOLELY on geography and flora and fauna.

	06-09-2003 20:27									#29
	Remove this text

not of genes and skin colour? Cali and Krux must hate it

	06-09-2003 20:27									#30
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

And it is the "solely" part that disturbs me. Once again, in Diamonds Universe the world of ideas and beliefs have nothing to do with the development of civilizations.