 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
If the US no longer buys from the Saudis, how does that affect global demand and supply?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
You assume in increase in Saudi output. But we're mostly talking about a change in supply patterns, where (in this example) China and the US switch suppliers.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Oerdin
You're right. But I remember reading an article in Forbes earlier this year which said the Saudis are having major budget problems as a result of a population that is mostly under 20, big subisides they put on food & energy, and the falling price of oil. These guys NEED to sell oil to someone. |
They surely depend on their oil. But they usually produce 10-15 % of the global output, and have 25 % of the world's reserves. And with spare capacity are the key swing producer. So unless you find a way to reduce global demand by/find alternative sources for 400 million tons per year, you won't but the Saudis dry. What is happening is the opposite, US import needs will grow sharply.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Whaleboy
|
 |
Please make all cheques payable to Whaleboy
Jan 2003 time: 05:30
|
|
quote:
We need to find ways to decrease our dependence upon oil, especially foreign oil, and it is clear Bush will not do this
|
And I'm agreeing with you??!?!? . Ah well...
Oil sucks, at the moment, our dependence means we are like a bus driving faster and faster towards an enormous hole in the ground. Needless to say, its not politically prudent to start instigating the required changes, after all, it might lose the election. Simple minded men in power, with simple minded policies to appeal to the simple minded voters . We truly are doomed.
Democracy: Ok, democracy is good to a point but lets be honest, right now it sucks!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MichaeltheGreat
|
|
Apolyton Grand Executioner
|
 |
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by elijah
And I'm agreeing with you??!?!? . Ah well...
Oil sucks, at the moment, our dependence means we are like a bus driving faster and faster towards an enormous hole in the ground. Needless to say, its not politically prudent to start instigating the required changes, after all, it might lose the election. Simple minded men in power, with simple minded policies to appeal to the simple minded voters . We truly are doomed.
Democracy: Ok, democracy is good to a point but lets be honest, right now it sucks! |
Our dependence on oil is economic. Oil is relatively cheap, and we have a huge amount of existing installation and technology base for oil combustion and for raw material use.
Despite the low fuel cost, there is already a lot of private incentive for combustion efficiency, primarily in aircraft and marine applications, where range, fuel capacity and cargo capacity tradeoffs encourage a lot of efficiency development. Those applications spill over into industrial engines and power production as well.
"Reducing dependency" is also a bit simplistic, since we get so many uses out of crude oil, (synthetic fabrics and polymers, chemical, fertilizer, as well as fuels) that reduction of "dependency" in one segment is pretty meaningless, because the remaining market segments are still dependent on other constitutents of different grades of crude.
Why do we use asphalt? Aside from all it's useful properties, the raw material is essentially waste left over after you fraction off heavy or intermediate crude into it's constituents. The same sort of process applies across the board - from one point of view, the particular constituents of crude oil you need for whatever you make is essentially waste material left over from other oil uses.
Transitioning to a post-oil based economy, or even one with a sharply reduced oil comsumption, is not something government can just mandate, and it's not something that can be accomplished without some economically very painful transition. You're talking trillions of dollars.
Last edited by MichaeltheGreat on 12-09-2003 at 02:30
|
|
|  |
 |
|
optimus2861
|
|
Halifax, NS
Nov 2000 time: 01:30
|
|
Boy, reading estimates like that just make me want to drink. Our economies are so oil-dependent, that once we hit that crest (and even if the estimates are off, chances are it'll be, if not in our lifetimes, then in our childrens' or grandchildrens' at the latest), things are going to start to get very painful, very quickly as crude costs rise and take the rest of the economy, and by extension, our way of life, on a roller-coaster. Way too big a problem for me to wrestle with, hence the desire to just drink.
Bleah. That's way too heavy a thought to be having on a (admittedly not exciting) Saturday night .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Mordoch
|
|
Denver, Colorado
Jan 2002 time: 05:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by pchang
We need to develop GMO crops to produce variable length hydrocarbons we can harvest. Then, we'll be able to grow what we need. Turning corn into alcohol is but the 1st step. The US produces more food than we need. This excess capacity could be converted to growing the hydrocarbons we need. Too bad for countries that are net importers of food, though. |
If you're going to go this general route, you should take a look at Thermal Depolymerization.
quote: If the process works as well as its creators claim, not only would most toxic waste problems become history, so would imported oil. Just converting all the U.S. agricultural waste into oil and gas would yield the energy equivalent of 4 billion barrels of oil annually. In 2001 the United States imported 4.2 billion barrels of oil. |
If this technology enters widespread use, the rest of the world can tell the Saudis to keep their oil and f*ck off.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|