 |
|  |
 |
|
Arrian
|
 |
Kneel before Grog!
Jul 2001 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: NYE's explaination might or might not be a cover story, I'm sure one would be inevitable, but if they couldn't reach the third plane with fighters, how about missiles? |
That's just a ludicrous idea. The fact is that 9/11/01 was the first time somebody hijacked an airliner for the purpose of slamming it into a building and killing lots of people. Prior to that, hijacking was about taking hostages and negotiating for things.
So what in the world makes you think the U.S. government would/should have authorized the military to shoot down a loaded civilian airliner!?!?!?
If you mean that, after the first 2 had hit, you expected the government to 1) decide "right, they're using them as projectile weapons, so we have to stop them; and 2) find missle batteries, give the orders to fire, and have the 3rd plane shot out of the sky before it could hit the Pentagon, you're asking for greased lightening from an organization (the government) that usually moves with the speed of a glacier. Authorization for the shoot-down of a civilian airliner isn't something you can just snap your fingers and get.
-Arrian
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by oedo
and now see on page 4, how the puppet masters make George W. Bush dance to their rhythms:
Potential rivals such as China are anxious to exploit these transformational technologies broadly, while adversaries like Iran, Iraq and North Korea are rushing to develop ballistic missiles and nuclear weapons as a deterrent to American intervention in regions they seek to dominate.
or here on page 87:
We cannot allow North Korea, Iran, Iraq or similar states to undermine American leadership, intimidate American allies or threaten the American homeland itself.
the axis of evil. when I first heard it, I thought, this was just another lapsus linguae by GWB. now I suspect it wasnīt.
nice idea. letīs find out where heīs got it from:
The current American peace will be short-lived if the United States becomes vulnerable to rogue powers with small, inexpensive arsenals of ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads or other weapons of mass destruction. - page 87
I wish I could share your optimism. well, time will tell.
now, this is what really pisses me. you donīt really discuss the points Meacher makes. you only use some shoot-dead arguments like conspiracy theorist or stupid crap. case closed. others shout anti-america or set the funny -smiley. period. any substance? nope. any arguments? zero.
so heīs a conspiracy theorist, because does nothing but quoting from the PNAC. I have to sleep over that.
good night
|
So the new stuff is that Cheney, Rumsfeld and Wolfie were gunning for Iraq, Iran and NKor from day one? Didnt need Meacher to know that. And that they tried to attach that agenda to 9/11? And that some people agree, and some disagree? Duh? How is that at all evidence that 9/11 was a conspiracy. It just shows that policy advocated will attach their favored policies to any situation. The Bush admin came into office saying there should be a tax cut cause the US was prosperous, and could afford it. Theyre now pushing a tax cut cause we're in a recession and we "need" it. This doesnt show that they either caused the prosperity, or the recession.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|