 |
|  |
 |
|
Sn00py
|
 |
From New Zealand
Aug 2001 time: 13:30
|
|
Ok, this is something I have been thinking about quite a lot recently.
"The poor stay poor and the rich get richer". Soon, this will be a saying that won't be said anymore.
I believe, that the Government won't ALLOW, EVERYONE (capable of working) in a short space of time, to be rich (I mean, rich enough to have a GOOD STANDARD of living and not having to work at some "low" paying job).
The reason I say that the government won't allow everyone to be rich, is because I can see now, that rich people, don't want to do all the REALLY important jobs that matter.
For example, a rich person would most likely not join the army, clean the streets, stack shelves, clear rubbish, etc. These sorts of jobs, if stopped, would cripple the country in days. The country, REQUIRES to have people who are "forced" into taking, low paying, or rather, crappy, "easy-to-get" jobs.
But, I believe, that we are in a very long process, of more and more people finding it easier to raise their standards of living, and not having to take on crappy jobs. I think, eventually, machines (robots, computers), will do most of the jobs that countries REQUIRE in order to function each and every day.
Therefore, the government, would see no reason to keep the poor in their place, and thus, a vast majority of the country, will be living in a medium to high standard of living.
What are your thoughts? Am I accurate? Or am I thinking nonsense? 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
it's all about the robots
the robots and nuclear weapons
it is all about the robots and nuclear weapons
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
:) Smiley
|
 |
USCA, Berkeley
Feb 2001 time: 21:30
|
|
quote: For example, a rich person would most likely not join the army, clean the streets, stack shelves, clear rubbish, etc. These sorts of jobs, if stopped, would cripple the country in days. The country, REQUIRES to have people who are "forced" into taking, low paying, or rather, crappy, "easy-to-get" jobs.
|
This is quite true. What is actually happening though is that the army is smaller, streets don't get cleaned as often, and low-maintenance warehouse stores become more commonplace.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Og
|
|
Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Jun 2001 time: 07:30
|
|
The way I see it in 50-100 years(if the world/civilization ramains relatively stable) we are going to have machines capable of doing every job that humas do a lot better and cheaper.
At that point people would have to think of things to do. And I think that most people would engage in arts, sports etc. since these are going to be the only things that simply don't make sence if done by machines.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sir Og
|
|
Lurking in Stara Zagora, Bulgaria
Jun 2001 time: 07:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by FrustratedPoet
People said this 50 years ago also. It wasn't true then and I doubt it will be true now.
There are certain jobs that will always get done cheaper by paying some illegal immigrant minimum wage rather than installing a full computer and machine system. |
How do you know they were wrong? The top margin gives us 50 years more to prove them right.
Anyway all I'm saying is that in the long run all WORK is going to be done by machines at lower costs than human work.
People might sweep their floors if they feel like it but they won't have to, because they would be able to afford a machine that would do the same faster and better.
Last edited by Sir Og on 15-09-2003 at 20:05
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The diplomat
|
 |
Terre Haute, IN USA
Sep 1999 time: 23:30
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sn00py
that rich people, don't want to do all the REALLY important jobs that matter. |
This statement is erroneous. "low" paying jobs are NOT the only important jobs. "rich" jobs are also quite neccessary. For example, society needs doctors, professors, lawyers, judges, CEO's, bank managers, etc... These are all very important high paying jobs. Without them, you'd be a third world nation.
In fact, it can be argued that these "rich" jobs are more important than "low" paying jobs. For example, a doctor is much more important than a Wal Mart cashier. You can automate the cashier job, and some places even have self-serve check-out lines where everything is automated. You can't automate the job of doctor. Furthermore, a doctor saves lives which requires expertise and skills which will deserve a higher income.
This idea that the rich don't contribute or that their jobs are not important, is one of the biggest fallacies in leftist economic thinking.
If you want a well-developped and advanced society, you MUST have the high paying jobs.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
What about robot rights? Don't they have a right to a living wage?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|