 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:30
|
|
If the Democrats nominate Clark, I may vote Democrat. The guy is outstanding - very much like Rumsfeld.
I still wonder why Clark insisted that we need far more troops for Iraq than Rumsfeld used. Rumsfeld turned out to be right, but did Clark ever acknowledge that?
There is no doubt, however, that Clark was fired as NATO commander for two reasons: his clash with the Brits over the Russians, and his continued insistence on using ground troops that apparently pissed off Clinton. He had gotten his NATO command because of friends at the White House and elsewhere outside the normal chain of command. When he pissed those same people off, his fate was determined.
But, my Democrat friends, if getting along with our European allies is more important than being right, Clark is not your man. The Brits (and perhaps all of Europe) were convinced that Clark would risk starting a war with Russia and apparently went out of their way to see that he was relieved of his NATO command. What does this say about Clark's capacity to shove his ego into the background when cooperation with a differing point of veiw is necessary to get along with Europe?
I would particularly like to hear from those Democrats who routinely bash MacArthur. MacArthur was fired for essentially the same reason as was Clark. He was willing to risk a world war and publicly critized his president's war strategy. If MacArthur was a lunatic, as so many Democrats think, so is Clark.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:30. Apolyton Time is 00:30. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|