 |
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by johndmuller
I think we need a well defined place to look for the latest word on the diplomacy, and/or more frequent diplomatic reports. I know that there is often nothing happening, but that is a piece of (sometimes missing) info as well.
. |
I post all significant events on this board as soon as they happen. I tried separate threads for our dealings with each faction but found that that was confusing as people would make all sorts of general comments in the specific thread. Now there is only one diplomacy thread except for the specific poll thread for the cycon doc flex trade.
I don't know what else you can expect-- I posted the cycon deals available and we have poll results indicating the faction's choice. I alos posted a deal with the university which I thought was pretty clear
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
For clarity
DIPLOMATIC UPDATE
1. Drones-- no response to my messages-- I emailed mongoose who indicated that buster handled diplomacy and the email had been forwarded. I have since PM'd buster at CGN without a response
2. Cycon-- the poll thread contains all that had been offered
3.UNiversity-- we are agreed on doc flex for eth calc-- I just need the operations people to complete it--They are also interested in pact. I will start a thread on this topic.
4. Hive -- They have offered any two of app physics, biogenetics and doc loyalty for doc flex-- When I hesitated they offered app physics for doc mob straight up-- I continue to stall sice I want to get the drones talking before trading either of these techs-- The plan is to get something from each the hives and the drones for doc flex and doc mob
Thats it
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Hercules
BTW I am not being critical. I had a genuine reason for the non trading. It effected more than one faction. I feel we are now ready to conclude a deal with the Borg for Doc:Flex. |
and I was not attempting to be critical of you . . I was offline for a while and you had a decision to make when facing time constraints.
I will be offline for the next 8 hours so pergaps you herc can call up maniac and see if we wtill have a deal
|
|
|  |
 |
|
johndmuller
|
 |
Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Feb 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
I post all significant events on this board as soon as they happen. I tried separate threads for our dealings with each faction but found that that was confusing as people would make all sorts of general comments in the specific thread. Now there is only one diplomacy thread except for the specific poll thread for the cycon doc flex trade.
I don't know what else you can expect-- I posted the cycon deals available and we have poll results indicating the faction's choice. I alos posted a deal with the university which I thought was pretty clear |
All in one thread (more or less like this one, but definitely timestamped) was what I was suggesting, preferably without much discussion from the rest of us (except maybe requests for clarifications). A format like your post following the one I quoted, where each factions status is summarized, with links to any other threads where the specifics might be located, ie like the threads dealing with specific factions. This way, we could look 'here' if this thread is the one, for a summation, without having to figure out whether or not the info is current or superceded by some other thread and look at the more specific threads for background and detail and the bulk of the discussion. I don't thinnk this would be too much work, if it is, please suggest some other format that you think would be better. It would of course, require some cooperation from the rest of us to honor the system, but I think it could work.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
No your format suggestion makes sense and is within what I can do pretty easily.
I will create a thread where I just edit the first post with the current diplomatic status , maybe I can ask someone to "top" the thread so I don't have to bump it.
So there will be a single up to date summary thread with concise info and other threads where things get hashed out reported and discussed.
I will do this ( tomorrow) -- Late here now-- very long day
|
|
|  |
 |
|
johndmuller
|
 |
Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Feb 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
Well I guess the various communication snafu's ended up with them deciding to get it on their own (unless we made a deal and the mention of it actually happening is hidden in the middle of some thread or other). If indeed they acquired it on their own, then we obviously have no say in their use of it, so we need to watch out that whomever that was over in the East that we saw on a ship, that they don't make the deal for Doc:Flex with the Borg instead of with us. Otherwise, it doesn't really bother me that much as it hopefully will mean that the Borg will finish repaying us techwise sooner than would be the case if we traded forward again with them. We should, however, try not to lose any other deals through communications mishaps in the future.
I don't know when/if Hercules sent that note above, but if it was before the Borgs had made the deal with whomever, then that would be problematic. In any case, I would have expected to hear from them on the subject by now; all the more reason to look more toward the PUT.
Meanwhile, with the Borg demonstrating this obsession with Doc:Flex, one must assume that the chances of them getting aggressive with probes is reasonably likely and should be acted on.
We want defensive probes!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hercules
|
 |
in Tir Na Og
Sep 2002 time: 05:31
|
|
Re Deal with PUT.
It's not crucial this turn but where was Ethical Calc from the PUT as their side of the deal. Did Archaic not read his internal comms. Then on top they ask for Cycon Comm link. PUT are on route to Ecol Eng in 6 years, handy?
Their logic on strategy is probably right. Where when is ethic Calc, they owe us.
Cycon: Despite Maniac email, Cycon still pursue research of Doc: Init. ?
Hive passed over Applied physics we delivered Doc: Mob
Miriam 1 year to Non linear
Roze 6 years to SoHB
Ship news
PMS Santiago hit IOd and moved off side
PMS Revenge exposed more territory
PMS KinG Lear heads home, 2 moves left, west or south?
PMS Farragut. close to pod at 10.38
Then there is the build possibilities.
New base, Atlantis on that single tile isle, 42,54 ?
Rover on transport ready to pop next turn.
Sea Colony pod has met with dismal exploration possibilities near DenLand
Rush possibilities:
Rita, 11 ecs to finish Crawler
Casablanca, 13 to finish former
Oh B Drones have popped up
At Liar's Lair and HMB (finsih Supply Crawler for 28).
Views 12 hours from now.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
I have been in contact with both the university and cycon
University- claim an error and eth calc will be sent on the next turn-- I believe them
Cycon- claim that a non-regular turn player was playing and chose doc ini as the best possible tech among those available. maniac claimed to be upset about this.
I can't say that I believe them
Other stuff
WE have not traded doc flex to the Hive pending our making a deal with the drones
The drones offered eth calc for doc flex-- I had to decline and let them know that eh calc would soon be in our ownership
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Hercules
Are Cycon going to change to HEC, next turn? |
Maniac gave no indication that this was their plan-- They would lose half their research points would they not??
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
Last edited by Googlie on 14-10-2003 at 20:27
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hercules
|
 |
in Tir Na Og
Sep 2002 time: 05:31
|
|
I received replies from both Maniac and Drogue along the same lines.
I don't believe them either. This offer to research NonLinear is based, I feel, on their belief that they can steal/trade it from Miriam or Roze. Well maybe so can we.
Dear Captain Hercules
Here is a copy of the message I sent to Flubber, explaing
and apologising for the mix-up.
"I write to you as Prime Function to apologise for the mix-up regarding our
turn-playing. With holidays and absenses things in the CyCon had been a bit
mixed up as of late, and so DBTS simply played the turn with what orders
were there, and doing what he saw as best. Since Corellion had not yet
posted the switch to HEC, as it was to be a late addition becuase of the
poll finishing, DBTS had no idea about the latest diplomacy. Please consider
this a formal apology on behalf of the CyCon, and accept our gift of 10ec
which we will put in the diplomacy box when we get the turn.
I am sorry for this mix up. As Maniac has said, we are willing to research
Nonlinear Mathemetics next, if you wish, to trade the tech you ideally
wanted (IIRC)."
DBTS has not been that active a member in the last couple of months, and so
has not been up to date with negotiations. As I said to Flubber, I am truly
sorry for the mix-up, and we are willing both to research Nonlinear Math and
trade that, if you wish, and gift you 10ec as an apology.
Yours,
Prime Function Drogue Beta-8
If Flubber can secure restrictive trading and non building of MCC terms and a good price I would sell Doc: Init just so we can be rid of them. With the money we might be able to buy Non Linear from Roz or Miriam, and let the cycon research HEC which we also want.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
johndmuller
|
 |
Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Feb 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
I'd like to believe the Borgs' story, but I'm having trouble going along with the idea that Doc:Initiative could be anyone's idea of the "best" tech for them to research (especially an "anyone" trusted to take the turns) given this presumed list of alternatives from the tech offerings tool:
- Doctrine: Initiave;
- Ethical Calculus;
- Polymorphic Software;
- Nonlinear Mathematics;
- High Energy Chemistry;
- Doctrine: Loyalty.
I could believe Ethical Calc as an unthinking SP oriented choice, bult the onlly way Doc:Init makes sense to me is that they were thinking of shaking us down once again into another attempted forced trade of one of our techs. Perhaps they can convince us otherwise, but given their less than 'convincing' history, I'd be surprised if they could come up with anything very credible (willing to let them try, however). If they fancy themselves roleplaying, I'd be interested to know what role that is they are playing.
To have any chance of getting back in our good graces, I think they need to provide a REALLY BIG GESTURE to prove that all this has just been a regretable error. Ambas'dor Flubber, do you think that you can get that point across? I guess I wouldn't rule out the possibility of putting Doc:init on the table, but that would require an EVEN BIGGER GESTURE on their part.
As dumb as switching research techs at this point would be for them (and for the global research effort as a whole), it might improve their credibility and it might stand a chance in the gesture department. It would definitely waste a few turns worth of research, but after all, they are on a course to effectively waste their whole research cycle duplicating our effort. Perhaps that would also be a talking point for Ambas'dor Flubber. They can't buy it from someone else this time, AFAIK, so we are the only recourse for them to avoid the redundant research of something they don't really need anyway (speaking of which, where did they get all that cash from?).
FlameFlash, as much as de-pacting makes a statement, it also hurts us as much as it hurts them, in commerce and in infiltration (and we don't have any probes at the moment to infiltrate them with to make up for that lack of infiltration - and we have a surplus of proposed probe missions already).
Last edited by johndmuller on 03-10-2003 at 21:45
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|