 |
Where to go on the doc flex deal ??
This poll is closed. |
| Accept the energy credits |
   |
4 |
66.67% |
| Accept the tech |
   |
2 |
33.33% |
| Openly Call their bluff |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Just continue to negotiate and negotiate |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Banana and xenorum |
   |
0 |
0% |
| Total: |
6 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
WEll it has come down to it with our cycon dealings . ..
They state they want doc flex NOW and if we won't trade it, they will get it from the AI.
They offer 2 choices
1. energy credits now, current offer is at 90 and they switch research to HEC to give to us in completion of the old ind auto deal
2. A tech for doc flex-- They will give us HEC when they finish it ( 6 years IIRC) if we give them doc flex NOW . . . they would still owe us a tech from the prior deal
THis leaves us with a few options
1. accept either of the above deals
2. tell them to go away and hope the AI won't sell them doc flex but risk them getting it for no advantage to us
3. just negotiate and negotiate to stall and see if they will push things to a head
Last edited by Flubber on 24-09-2003 at 19:03
|
|
|  |
 |
|
johndmuller
|
 |
Capitol Hill, Colony of DC
Feb 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
Voted for the 90 PofE and them researching/giving-to-us the HEC tech in 5+ years (but not a lot plus).
I am as annoyed with them as anyone here if not more so. but I am willing to put off our revenge for a little while at least - until we get our trade balance back to even with them anyway; I doubt that they would be honoring their debts should we go hostile with them.
If they are not bluffing, us getting the 90 is better than Roze or Miriam getting it. Even if they are bluffing, if we trade it to them, we still won't be recovered from the IndAuto deal until 15 or 20 years from now (assuming they don't do the same thing to us again, in which case it could be never); given the way our relations with them are going, there is a good chance that we will no longer be doing business with them by then (except for our more traditional piratatical business plan), so we will essentially get nothing for it then. Maybe clearing the decks of all the old deals will put all the bad feelings behind us and we can start fresh with them.
Hopefully, they will be unable to retrade it before we are done milking it, and will not claim that their next choice of techs did not include HEC (or NonLinear), but instead 'forced' them to research something we would be earnestly p!$$ed off for them to be studying (like Doc:Init, especially, but perhaps also including EthicalCalc or anything else we have or expect to get). Ambas'dor Flubber may wish to warn them (diplomatically, of course) of the consequences of such behavior and get appropriate assurances.
Maki, as to using the pact as leverage, I think we are the ones benefiting from it at the moment, rather than them, at least in terms of commerce, although I would have to check to be sure. Even so, it is probably a pittance, but it can have a psychological effect anyway. It is easy enough to unpact, but it is not always so easy to get rid of a treaty, which would have similar (but less) trade implications, although close as we are, they could presumably send over a warrior-scout to engage a former of ours if they wanted to un-treaty bad enough. Remember, our warships now have the capture possibility, so they could be donating whatever ships they send over, including their passengers.
WE NEED DEFENSIVE PROBES (Preferably morale-upgraded by military facs).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
IMportant change
The cycon are now offering if we go tech for tech, they will lend us 75 ec until they return HEC to us-- so its tech for cash and then cash for tech-- their outstanding obligation owing us a tech would remain
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Hercules
What I take from this is they tried trade with the AI and it didn't work. Would that be a correct assumption. |
They claimed that they have confirmed they CAN get it from the AI . .. . The "loan" theysay was just a way to try to make the deal more fair in that we would get the use of 75 ec for the same amount of time they got the use of Doc flex
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by johndmuller
Maybe they'd be willing to pay us a nominal fee in the meanwhile, like they let us keep 5 ec per turn until we get the HEC and of course, they couldn't retrade the Doc: Flex. After all, that still leaves us in the lurch for the IndAuto deal for the entire time it takes them to do the next research. BTW, where did we leave off the discussions with them about all the fees and interest in that complicated and controversal deal we floated with them before?
Herc, if they tried with the AI and couldn't do it, wouldn't they be all the more likely to buy it from us instead of proposing this odd arrangement? Perhaps they have something else in mind for the money. |
They rejected all the complicated stuff with the simple argument that they can get the tech for a lot less from the AI
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Googlie
|
 |
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
Last edited by Googlie on 14-10-2003 at 23:37
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Googlie
But ... but ... they learned from the best. (Remember your famous bluff re Plan Net?)
In case you don't, here's the link
Talk about the pot calling the kettle black ............... |
Now now googlie-- we didn't really bluff since we could have researched plan nets ourselves and in fact, I was mildly suprised when our operations folks chose to head for another tech before the plan nets deal was FULLY nailed down. I think we saved some tech cost on our next tech by finishing soc psych before accepting plan nets . . . thats ALL we did-- If we knew they would not trade, we would have researched it ourselves.
WE have NEVER had an outstanding obligation to another faction that we have ignored as they have done .
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
Googlie
I looked at the old thread again and the verbatim text of my messages with maniac. I was completely honest !! I said we would go for soc psych if they would trade and plan nets if they would not . . . Thats what happened. NO bluff
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|