 |
|  |
 |
|
monkspider
|
 |
banned
Aug 2001 time: 23:31
|
|
The thing about conservatism is that it is inherently self-destructive. In fact, if we were to follow conservatism through to it's logical conclusion, we would witness the complete destruction of the entire world. That's just one of the many reasons why it will never work.
As far as conservatives being greedy, I know a lot of conservatives who are not greedy at all. In fact, they tend to be conservative on social issues, but much more open-minded to progressive economic policies. Now, I would say that if an individual were fiscally conservative, it would be a pretty sure bet that they were either misled at some point, or they are in fact, greedy. There is no room for economic conservatism in a charitable heart. God bless em though, all we can do is try to reason with them, and hope for the best.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:31
|
|
I think this thread is mainly about economic conservatism. Bush is conservative in this regard only in one respect - taxes. He is conservative in no other respect.
He does appear, however, to be the most socially conservative president in some time. I was just trying to think of a more socially conservative president in US history, and I can think of none.
As to foreign policy, being aggressive in defense of American values and interests is very typical of "Southern" Democrats. I think of Jefferson, Jackson, Pope, Roosevelt (was he really born in the North?), Truman, Kennedy (vastly different from most Northern Democrats) and Clinton. Neoconservativism is really the old Democrat Manifest Destiny in new jargon.
I just wish to note that Bush is a Texan.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|