 |
|  |
 |
|
Togas
|
 |
California
Jun 2002 time: 21:31
|
|
Please note, we should not go call up our two new contacts and tell them why we're at war with GCA. However, it is going to be very obvious to them shortly and they are going to ask questions.
Once they do, the following explain(s) should suffice:
We needed to in order to have any chance of winning this game.
GCA is a very strong civ, very cunning and able to fight battles. They were able to fight, and defeat, two nations at once. We fear and respect their military might.
Eventually, we were going to fight if either of our teams were going to win, so we had to pick the most logical time to fight and fight them then.
That time came when we got Feudualism ahead of them. Our window opened when we got Feudalism and closed when they got it. THEIR window opened when they got Chivalry, which would be shortly thereafter.
We hit them now, just before they made it to the next age, and just before GWT could contact them and trade them the techs they needed to make the jump.
We do not hold them in comtempt or disregard. They were very honorable neighbors and traders, and we regret that we had to fight them, but this game is a competition between teams that involves combat between them.
War is a part of every civ game. All of the top civs in this game have high scores and success because of war. We must also do the same if we want to ever have a chance to compete.
Let us not make jokes or trash talk or make up lame excuses about how GCA "deserved" to be attacked or pretend that they "asked for it" or any other such nonsense. This war is not a punishment, it is an opportunity for Apolyton to become great by besting a very strong neighbor on the field of battle. We embrace this chance to prove our worth against a very able and intelligent foe. We enjoy a good contest and a good challange and hope that GCA lives up to their reputation.
--Togas
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arnelos
|
 |
of the Free World
Sep 2002 time: 00:31
|
|
It is worth pointing out that GCA believes we have been planning a war against them the entire game.
This is not true, we have been planning a war against CDG the entire game. The simple reason for this is that we realized we could not win the game unless we took over (at the least) CDG's lands. This is one of the reasons we sought out GCA as a friend and ally.
The only reason GCA became the new target was that CDG lands were conquered by GCA. This left us with the option of either deciding to fight the larger and more powerful GCA in order to fulfill our plans to take CDG's lands or to resign ourselves to losing the game. We made the choice we felt would best enable us to remain competitive in the game.
We don't fault GCA for that, they had every right to conquer CDG. That said, their conquest of CDG is, ultimately, the reason why we are at war with GCA - not because we're upset with them, but simply because it means they're in the way of what we feel is our only path to remaining competitive.
We should write something along these lines, send it to the other teams, and post it to the UN when appropriate.
Last edited by Arnelos on 30-09-2003 at 07:37
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:31
|
|
GCA states that they've reported this to the UN. Where is said thread located? I've looked at the UN open forum, but nothing there...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hot_Enamel
|
 |
Melbourne, Australia
Aug 2002 time: 14:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Arnelos
I'm not saying we should take the high road. The point is that we were aiming to wipe out CDG. We switched targets to GCA when CDG was wiped out by GCA.
|
Arnelos ..
Didnt mean to say that you were trying to .. or that anyone was.
It was just a general comment.
I know I quoted you .. but my comments were not directed at anyone specific
Anyway ...
My memory (which could be wrong because you can read threads all out of order), was that
The first time we talked serious about a war with GCA, was only when CDG offered cities.
It was mentioned that we were planning for a war anyway, so we might as well.
And that the deal did not mention any time frame, so we could decide later when to do it.
This time frame was chosen, only because we got Fuedalsim, and CFC was taking a beating.
If those 2 things didnt happen, there is a chance we could be still building now, and debating when would be the best time to strike.
It's a minor point .. And I dont really care about it.
My concern was that GCA will just use the information in some way, and we should be prepared if they did.
No big deal ...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|