 |
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:31
|
|
The problem is we don't know all the things they have available.
Impact infantry with amphibious on a crusier transport.
(impact, marine ability, crusier)
For
Ecological Engineering and Ethicial Calculus.
We can probably get the armor off the drones if it's alot of trouble getting it off the cycon.
quote: Some crazy ideas:
We could possible sell them ethicial calculus, or sell them gene splicing. 150 ECs for ethicial calculus and 200 ECs for gene splicing would go a long way to helping us pop boom. However, that should only be suggested if they have trouble giving us those prototypes. Or possibly we ask for the money as a retainer until they get the prototypes to us.
__________________________________________________
__
As it may be a number of turns before you are able to give us the prototypes to us can we have a loan. Giving you the techs earlier gives you an advantage, a loan that will be repaid upon receiving the prototypes would be useful for the hive.
We wouldn't need all the money at once.
__________________________________________________
__
Maybe we sell them ethicial calculus for 100 ECs on the understanding that 100 ECs will be paid back when they are able to get a certain prototype to us.
|
Okay the EC ideas should probably be brought up later. After we have figured out how long it will take for them to get us the prototypes, and what the actual trades are.
Last edited by Kody on 21-10-2003 at 06:00
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Voltaire
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Aug 2001 time: 22:31
|
|
Speaking of the CyCon, we need to seriously discuss what we will do with them in the long term. By this I refer to their desire for a joint-victory pact (AKA permipact).
I will say this now, we will not betray the Drones (not that anyone has suggested such a move), discussion of such a nature at this point would be ludicrous given that we have committed so much to our alliance, and furthermore the ethical dilemma (for you moralists out there) with breaking the Drone pact would be much more complicated than using the CyCon.
My stance on the issue remains that we should utilize the CyCon as a tool for as long as possible. This implies that if lies become necessary so be it, we will lie. If betrayal becomes necessary (which at some point it will) we should betray them. This in essence advocates the Machiavellian approach to foreign relations with the CyCon. I am well aware that certain individuals (you know who you are ) have objections to this policy on moral grounds. I’m afraid I will need more convincing than simply moral arguments against such an approach. What I am looking for in this discussion tends toward rational arguments in favour of whatever policy toward the CyCon one might support. If it can be demonstrated that we gain more via a non- Machiavellian policy then we will adopt such a policy for it would be the rational approach.
Now to get to the specifics, in the short term a Machiavellian policy would require that we lie to the CyCon and accept their joint-pact. This will allow us to use them more closely for our own gains, the downside being that if the CyCon request of us an action which we cannot do (i.e. attack the Drones) our incorporation makes the pact null and void, and hence our objectives of using them fail. Now the chances of this seem rather unlikely if we operate on rational principles and steer CyCon policy so that we do not encounter ourselves in such a position, IMO this can be done, and the risks of attempting so remain negligible enough (since the CyCon themselves will act rationally, or at least the probability that they will remains high) and the potential rewards remain high, we should adopt the Machiavellian approach.
Chairman Voltaire,
Foreign Policy for Planet, Datalinks
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:31
|
|
Well my opinion is we currently have such an advantage that we don't need to even use them let alone betray them.
A betrayal of the cycon to the magnitude of joint-victory pacting with them then betraying would likely see a few people leaving the hive in disgust. In fact the cycon have already had one person leave their faction in the wake of the peace-cycon incident. What you advocate is far worse.
Finally, wouldn't a victory be far more satisfying for all involved if we did not have to adopt underhand tactics to achieve our goals. If we win without adopting these kinds of tactics we will likely be congratulated and we'll then move on to the next game. However, by betraying someone there will likely be a fair amount of animosity for months after the game is finished.
Furthermore, the cycon have shown they are not necessarily professional in their game dealings, letting their angry over the game incident spill into real life discussion. Their anger came from frustration at the pirates holding back in their pact. Think of how they’ll react if we betray them.
Also accepting a joint-victory pact with the cycon then betraying them will raise questions in the drone’s mind about what the hive is actually capable of. If I was part of the drones I would be seriously questioning the trustworthiness of the Hive.
I'm not going to even relay this conversation to the drones. As this is probably the worst idea I've seen yet in the hive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:31
|
|
.... and apparently everyone I've talked to agrees with the chairman.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snowflake
|
 |
falling, once again
Apr 2003 time: 23:31
|
|
Proposal 1 (Chairman's idea - basically lie to them about joint victory pact)
quote: Poll Result: Perm pact with CC?
Go for perm pact now 0 0%
Non perm pact with CyCon and be truthful about it 1 11.11%
Non perm pact with CyCon and don't tell them until later 1 11.11%
Non perm pact with CyCon, do not tell them and go for surprise attack 2 22.22%
Non perm pact with CyCon, wait to see what options are open 5 55.56%
Write in 0 0%
xenodoughnuts 0 0%
Total: 9 voters 100%
Official message:
Dear Function Drogue and Function Delta:
After further discussion and consultation among the Hive governing and administrative bodies, I'm happy to bring you the Hive's official message: it has been decided to formally issue an offer to the CyCons of a research and non-aggression pact with a high likelihood of it being developed into a joint victory permanent pact. We would appreciate if you could pass this information along to the CyCon government for approval. May peace and friendship between the Hive and the CyCons last forever.
|
I will then edit the poll result and only leave the option with the 5 votes.
Last edited by Snowflake on 23-10-2003 at 02:02
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snowflake
|
 |
falling, once again
Apr 2003 time: 23:31
|
|
Deputy chairman, you realize that when you raised this opinion before you didn't get many supporters? Drones doesn't like it. GooglieGod doesn't like it. I like it because I love the CyCons. :weep: But I'm a nobody. And I don't think the Chairman, Marshal, Kody, and Vander, Micha, hmmm who else, well everybody else don't like it. Vev on the other hand, hmmm, he might just obstain. Sorry. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Voltaire
|
 |
Calgary, Alberta
Aug 2001 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by HongHu
Deputy chairman, you realize that when you raised this opinion before you didn't get many supporters? Drones doesn't like it. GooglieGod doesn't like it. I like it because I love the CyCons. :weep: But I'm a nobody. And I don't think the Chairman, Marshal, Kody, and Vander, Micha, hmmm who else, well everybody else don't like it. Vev on the other hand, hmmm, he might just obstain. Sorry. |
I’m sorry to disagree with HongHu on this issue, but she has been correct in stating that there doesn’t exist much support for a three member permipact. Furthermore I am unequivocally and effusively opposed to compromising again in order to achieve victory, we can do it with the Drones alone on side. I would (for once) exercise my power and veto such a decision if it were made, regardless of this the fact that the Drones will be opposed to the CyCon joining a permipact simply nullifies any ideas of it. Since part of the agreement of the permipact was that we coordinate our foreign policies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
dacole
|
|
Ok like proposal two I am opposed to stabbing them in the back for machilvalian reasons which are as follows. Even if we tell the drones we are going to do it, it will sorrow our relationship with them, though acting like we are now may very well do the same thing. It will also posion our relationships with the other factions and make them more likely to feel justified in useing other atorcities against us later. Reputations is important and unless we are the dominant power in the game enough that we can take on everyone else at the same time and win we should avoid such actions since it may very well unite everyone against us.
Just my two cents
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Snowflake
|
 |
falling, once again
Apr 2003 time: 23:31
|
|
Sigh dacole, they are the leaders. Chairman, Marshal, Deputy Chairman. CCC members. Head of CMC. They have made up their minds. We are not really democratic you know? It was just a false impression. The poll decides nothing. Chairman has veto power.
If everyone will be against us, they asked for it. If the Hive will be destroyed, they begged for it.
Plus, I know they will fight hard when the time is here. They have been lazy, enjoying their carefree days under the fake sun. It will be bloody. But the Hive will stand up, with all the big leaders and us drones fighting together. Even if we fall, we will fall together.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|