 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
vovan
|
|
I have also been toying with the idea of having some kind of special contest after the 25th official Story Contest, it being a quarter of a hundred and all. So, in that sense, I really like the idea of having a sort of an "Ultimate Best of the Best" contest, where we would have the best stories of all time compete.
However, I am not sure about having a panel of three judges choosing the best stories. On the one hand it does seem like a pretty good idea: we haven't seen a good voter turnout in the past few BoB contests, so it might be a good idea to just pick the ones the regulars deem best and give them the crown.
On the other hand, I am not so sure about it: I believe something we feel strongly about in this forum is the sense of community. It is quite pleasing to see that the old-time authors and the newer members are on the same level. There is no kind of hierarchy based on the number of posts, or the number of stories posted, or anything, unlike a few other parts of the site, where one may be judged by the rank under his name rather than the content of his or her posts. So, something we feel strongly about is the sense of equality: stories are very welcome from new people and old-timers alike. In that sense, I, personally, wouldn't want to have a certain panel of three or however many judges pick the best stories, because that sort of artificially creates a certain sense of elitism and inequality that we have so successfully avoided here so far.
So, as I was reading your post, I was thinking, how to make it so that we could have a board of judges for such a contest, and on the other hand we wouldn't introduce the elitism associated with being in a judging position and being "one of the few". One thing that came immediately to mind is essentially to have a certain poll in order to choose the judges... But that could have the potential of quickly turning into a puplarity contest which we probably want to avoid. What we could do is basically have the same system we have with the stories:
- A candidate for being a judge must be nominated and seconded.
- One cannot nominate him- or herself.
- The nominee must have posted at least one story at one time or another on these forums.
- As soon as there are, say, twelve, nominations (I don't suppose there will be more? And if there are less, we can cut the number to nine.), the voting is held and the three authors with most votes get to be the judges.
Also, here is another idea: how about the prize for winning this ultimate contest be Civ3: Conquests. If we decide to do it that way, though, it's probably a good idea to hold the ultimate contest after the 20th regular contest. By the time we get through 25th, chances are, everyone will already have Conquests. 
In addition to the judges choice of the best stories, we could also hold the "People's choice" contest or something, where we would give the people a chance to vote as well, and see if there is any turnout. 
Just some ideas.
* Vovan throws two cents into the bin *
EDIT: Must have had five or six "sort of"s in the first two paragraphs of the post. Edited them out. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
vovan
|
|
Well, I was thinking about having Civ3: Conquests as a prize for the Ultimate BoB contest, and I think there might be a little problem.
Namely: many of the great writers of the past are no longer visiting these forums. So, while we may choose a winner, chances are, we may never find the person to give the prize to! So, maybe it is a good idea after all to keep this contest just for pride and admiration. 
But I still like the idea of having Conquests as a prize for something. So here's another idea that might just make this forum a place bustling with writers. Maybe we could have a contest sort of separate from the Official Story Contest Anniversary thing, and have it be in celebration of Conquests. We could have it so that for a couple of weeks (or up to a month) people could submit stories that are civ-related and have some relation to conquests: like, some of the new civs play a role, or maybe some of the new units or other features. And then the winner, by popular vote (or again, by choice of a panel of judges) gets Conquests as a prize. That way, we ensure that there is actually someone to give the prize to. 
I am sure such a contest would be a lot of fun, and if the admins give it a nice amount of publicity and put it up there with the other game-related contests in the Apolyton Contests section, it would bring quite a bit of attention to these forums.
The problem I see with this, too, is that the release of the game is very near: just some two and a half weeks from now. So, the people would not have a lot of time to write their stories, and then the timeframe for when we accept submissions will be very short. On the other hand, if we extend the period beyond the release date, people might not have that much of an incentive to participate: I would rather pay to get the game now, than wait a month for a chance to get it for free.
So, I don't know. If we were to go ahead with this idea, it would have to be done by the end of this week. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lord Zalzabad
|
|
Australia
Dec 2001 time: 05:31
|
|
I'd love the "Lordie" too as the title of the award
(BTW, sorry bout the lack of posts. I have not forgotten my commitments, just been very very busy. I promise I will get round to finishing my story)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
DarkCloud
|
 |
of Lists
Jul 2000 time: 05:31
|
|
quote: Namely: many of the great writers of the past are no longer visiting these forums. So, while we may choose a winner, chances are, we may never find the person to give the prize to! So, maybe it is a good idea after all to keep this contest just for pride and admiration. |
We could, perhaps, email them?
quote: But I still like the idea of having Conquests as a prize for something. So here's another idea that might just make this forum a place bustling with writers. Maybe we could have a contest sort of separate from the Official Story Contest Anniversary thing, and have it be in celebration of Conquests. We could have it so that for a couple of weeks (or up to a month) people could submit stories that are civ-related and have some relation to conquests: like, some of the new civs play a role, or maybe some of the new units or other features. And then the winner, by popular vote (or again, by choice of a panel of judges) gets Conquests as a prize. That way, we ensure that there is actually someone to give the prize to. |
That's an idea... We would have to set a minimum limit of say, 4-5 submissions for there to be a prize to be awarded... so that we can drum up some real interest... Hopefully we still have enough authors that they could craft something that rapidly.
But as you mention, the deadline has already bassed for conqeusts to be a new game.
Sigh... I'll keep thinking, and when I have more time I might have the impetus to do something, but I havent' even really goetten on the internet in the last 2 weeks for more than perhaps 3 hours combined 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|