28-10-2003 00:35									#1
	C3C: Incas UU -- Possible problem Remove this text

Today I first time looked through Conquest Info on civ3.com (I know it is kind of late) and I realized that Incas UU is quite worthless.

Incas have Chasqui Scout: 1/1/2 which is armed version of the scout and moves across hill/mountains at cost 1. Looks great so far, but...
a. Inca starts with regular scout;
b. it costs 20!
c. it does not upgrade to anything millitary worhtwhile, explorers? (unless they changed normal upgrade path).

(a), (b), and (c) makes this Chasqui Scout worthless for the purpose it was designed!

If Incas can build normal scouts then it is a better option because putting out 2,3,4 or more additional scouts (depends on map settings) is paramount, so 20 shields cost does not cut in). Thus, these Chasquies will not be built for scouting -- too expensive.

On the other hand, if Incas can build only Chasqui then they are in serious disadvantage compare to other expansionists: they cannot field as many scouts ASAP and will be lagging behind with goody hut popping.

Another draw back of Chasqui is accidental GA if somebody (excluding barbarians) attacked it and lost.

As it now the only use of it is to build one around middle age to trigger GA on some redlined Archer or Longbowman.

My suggestions:
1. Incas have to start with Chasqui (not regular scout).
2. Chasqui should cost 10.

Cost 10 is not the great advantage: the do not upgrades to swordsmen like Aztecs Warriors, so rushing somebody with them or building them for military purpose is somewaht pointless.

As goodie huts are explored, Chasqui could hunt barbarians and their camps, so here they should cost 10 because attacking something with unit 1/1/2 at price 20 is rather stupid. Warriors and archers could do that better and elites could be used for GL later without fear of unwanted GA.

A more radical approach is to give them +1 to movement: 0/0/3 at normal cost and no terrain discounts (it might be too good if combined).

The bottom line: Scouts should never costs more that 10, othrewise they are not worth they price.

	28-10-2003 01:09									#2
	Get a bigger avatar today!

I agree. Somehow i get the impression somthing is left out of the preview. They can't suck THAT bad :/

	28-10-2003 02:05									#3
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

Think of it this way:
Chasqui scout are chariots available right from the beginning, who do not require horses, and who explore quickly on mountains and hills.
If you play on a mountaineous map, chasqui scouts can be great, because they'd go twice faster than any other unit on the high grounds = those from where you can see two tiles around.
They'll also remain good as pillagers until the explorers come. Gotta love pillaging that lone Iron resource at the border, just the turn at which you declared the war

	28-10-2003 02:18									#4
	Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

You can pillage with normal scouts anyway (in PTW at least) and 1 defence would not save you: enemy using its roads for 3x movement.

Chariots? Seriously, have you tried to fight with them? I do not mean War Chariots (Egyptian UU). Chariots are good as pre-builds only.

	28-10-2003 02:28									#5
	Put an end to popups!

Jaguar Warriors have the same stats, and cost half the money. The Incan UU sucks indeed.

	28-10-2003 02:56									#6
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Yeah. I agree. It's bad that you can't upgrade it.

	28-10-2003 04:34									#7
	Get a bigger avatar today!

Chariots also upgrade, making them much more valuable.

I think the Incan scouth should simply replace their regular scout, cost ten, and upgrade to explorer. It would basically be a jaguar warrior instead of a scout.

	28-10-2003 05:33									#8
	Re: C3C: Incas UU -- Possible problem Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote: Originally posted by pvzh My suggestions: 1. Incas have to start with Chasqui (not regular scout). 2. Chasqui should cost 10.

Let's use a scenario to show why this is a bad idea.

Instead of the Chasqui we'll use the Jag Warrior in this example.

Let's say you are playing a mod that let's you start with one Jag Warrior. Okay, say you are playing in an MP game with your buddy. Say he starts about 10 tiles away. Say you discover him with your starting Jag within 5 turns. Can you say game over for your buddy? He likely won't have any defender at this point but if he does it's about a 35% chance of taking his warrior out.

Now imagine it's not your buddy, but rather the AI and you. How would you feel when the AI Jag Warrior comes to your capital before you can build a single defender?

How is this scenario different from a standard Jag rush? Simple, the Aztecs don't start with a Jag and instead need to wait a few turns.

	28-10-2003 05:39									#9
	Suffering from ads?

Interesting point WS!

	28-10-2003 10:04									#10
	Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

I think that the risk of such a quick defeat occuring every single time that I play as a civ from the Americas, start withing 10 tiles of the Incas and the Incans make a direct beeline to my undefeated city is worth not having another useless UU.

Let's face it... the above scenario isn't going to trouble the AIs that start with a handful of defenders, and is going to so rarely be a problem to the human player that giving the Incas a lame UU just isn't worth it.

A 20 cost scout does negate the purpose of having scouts, which are best used in groups of 4 or 5 as early as possible.

I'd rather have the Incans with a decent UU. I'm willing to live in fear that 1 in evrery 1000 games will be over in ten turns.

-Fosse

	28-10-2003 10:31									#11
	Increase Your PM Length

BTW, the Chasqui Scout enslaves in the mesoamerican scenario (if I had it right). There is no mention of enslavement in the general game's pedia entry, but it may be an omission, I don't know.

	28-10-2003 15:34									#12
	Suffering from ads?

quote: Originally posted by Fosse Let's face it... the above scenario isn't going to trouble the AIs that start with a handful of defenders, and is going to so rarely be a problem to the human player that giving the Incas a lame UU just isn't worth it. . . . I'd rather have the Incans with a decent UU. I'm willing to live in fear that 1 in evrery 1000 games will be over in ten turns.

It is obvious that you don't play MP games.

	28-10-2003 16:10									#13
	Inflate your Upload Space

I agree that on the face of it the Chasqui Scout sounds a bit rubbish. However, I still remember this time last year when many of us were fearful that the Gallic Swordsman would be so over-powered as to ruin the standard game. I'm reserving judgement until I play with the units for myself.

	28-10-2003 17:14									#14
	Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

quote: Originally posted by FrustratedPoet I agree that on the face of it the Chasqui Scout sounds a bit rubbish. However, I still remember this time last year when many of us were fearful that the Gallic Swordsman would be so over-powered as to ruin the standard game. I'm reserving judgement until I play with the units for myself.

It was overpriced just like the scout

	28-10-2003 18:48									#15
	Tired of ads?

quote: Originally posted by WarpStorm It is obvious that you don't play MP games.

My friends and I play Hotseat and LAN games all of the time., thanks.

Again, the odds of one of us beelining directly to an opponant's city from turn 1 are incredibly low. That's why I said it's really not a problem for humans.


I'd rather take that small risk and have a good UU when I play the Incas.

	29-10-2003 02:14									#16
	Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

No civ should start the game with an Attack unit (especially not one with high movement).

That said, the Chasqui Scout does indeed suck.


Dominae

	29-10-2003 03:29									#17
	Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

If I designed the unit, I think I'd have made it 0/0/1 ATR 10 shields (and still may once I start modding Conquests). This means that they can't get a GA with it, but it'd be a great scout.

	29-10-2003 03:36									#18
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote: Originally posted by WarpStorm If I designed the unit, I think I'd have made it 0/0/1 ATR 10 shields (and still may once I start modding Conquests). This means that they can't get a GA with it, but it'd be a great scout.

	29-10-2003 03:49									#19
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

But the vanilla players get a sucky unit :/

	29-10-2003 03:55									#20
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

I was hoping that this unit had something else to compensate for its poor stats and upgrade path (like the enslaving ability), but since beta testers think it sucks, it must indeed suck...

Oh well, that's what the AU mod is for!

	29-10-2003 04:24									#21
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

quote: Originally posted by WarpStorm If I designed the unit, I think I'd have made it 0/0/1 ATR 10 shields (and still may once I start modding Conquests). This means that they can't get a GA with it, but it'd be a great scout.

I would probably drop price to 10 shields and reduce attack to 0 (while keeping defense of 1). And then make it a starting unit.

	29-10-2003 04:30									#22
	Suffering from ads?

I'm not saying it sucks, there are uses for it. Suppressing and capturing workers comes to mind immediately. As does trashing the infrastructure of your fledgling neighbors.

I would rather see a quirkier better scout, though.

	29-10-2003 04:49									#23
	Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Give it the Hidden Nationality ability and it would rock.

Never have worker problems again.

	29-10-2003 05:36									#24
	Put an end to popups!

Hidden Nationality UU?

quote: Originally posted by player1 I would probably drop price to 10 shields and reduce attack to 0 (while keeping defense of 1). And then make it a starting unit.

I was thinking the same.

Of course the AI will have a hard time triggering its GA that way (especially since it doesn't build any units with the "explore" flag, and you need both an attack and defense factor to be able to flag a unit as "offense" or "defense" for the AI to build it).

	29-10-2003 06:33									#25
	Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

I think I voted for 0/1/1 ATAR too...

	29-10-2003 07:40									#26
	Tired of ads?

quote: Originally posted by pvzh You can pillage with normal scouts anyway (in PTW at least) and 1 defence would not save you: enemy using its roads for 3x movement.

No you can't, Scouts can't pillage.

quote: Chariots? Seriously, have you tried to fight with them? I do not mean War Chariots (Egyptian UU). Chariots are good as pre-builds only.

I've never even built a single Chariot in any of my games. I'll always wait a bit longer until I can get Horsemen. They're pretty much useless units IMO, I don't know why they even stuck them in there.

	29-10-2003 07:50									#27
	Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

Well, to play the devil's advocate ... If you build Chariots early, they are cheaper in the long run to upgrade them to Horsemen or Knights than it would be to build your army of Horsemen (or knights) from scratch ... Granted, I myself, hardly ever follow this reasoning since the initial payoff is small to nonexistent, but the long-term payoff, IMHO, is actually damned good. Just some "food-for-thought."

EDIT: Now that I think about it, I've never tried it with Chariots but I have followed this reasoning in a number of games and compiled a force of Horsemen with the sole purpose of upgrading them at a later time to Knights.

	29-10-2003 15:38									#28
	Increase the size of your Attachments

Yes, Chariot-to-Horseman works too, the only disadvantage being that you have to deliberately delay your acquisition of horseback riding to get the greatest advantage from it, and in some cases, to get any advantage from it at all.

If you are an expansionist (like, say, um... the Iroquois), it can be hard to avoid "accidentally" getting HB, and some players even use the exploit of researching 39 turns of HB and then going to 0% science to precisely control when they reach HB. Never done it myself; while I'm hardly the one to avoid exploits per se, this one doesn't pass my lameness filter.

USC

	29-10-2003 21:40									#29
	Full PM-box? Change here!

quote: Originally posted by Willem No you can't, Scouts can't pillage.

Scouts can pillage.

Time to dust off some of those Expansionist civs!


Dominae

	30-10-2003 00:00									#30
	Got spare money?

quote: Originally posted by Dominae Scouts can pillage. Time to dust off some of those Expansionist civs! Dominae

As a matter of fact, I always play American. But I always just hit the E key and forget about them, I've never even thought of trying to get them to pillage. I guess I'll have to check that out more often.