 |
|  |
 |
|
BeBro
|
 |
of the Krauts
Mar 2000 time: 06:31
|
|
quote: [SIZE=1] Originally posted by lord of the mark
Jews qua Jews had NO such role in the USSR. The USSR was not a Jewish state. Those Jews who played leading roles in the USSR also persecuted both Judaism as a religion, and also persecuted secular Jewish nationalism, in both its Zionist and Yiddish-Bundist forms. There is no analogy with whatever guilt (if any) the Germans should bare for the Nazis.
|
I made nearly the same point on a German board about it. The entire Jewish-Bolschevik thing is idiotic, absolutely agree with Kropotkin here.
quote:
That the notion of blaming Jews for communist crimes was a trope of the antisemitic right for many years only makes this look worse. |
Well, I know. But that isn´t my point. When you write....
quote:
It is not only wrong, it is VERY troubling. |
...I can understand you, but my point is that there is nearly no refutation of his points anywhere here in Germany in the media or so. No discussion about what he said. There is simply the outcry "this is anti-semitic" - end of story. For me, to show where he´s wrong is the most important part, simply shutting down the speech or the discussion about it helps noone.
quote:
If it is not first priority now, it is because Jews are actually being murdered now, by people who seem to get the sympathy of much of the european left, who seem unable to condemn the murder of Jews by terrorists without adding a "but". |
Hm, this guy is not from the left, and he doesn´t get much sympathy, from neither side of the (democratic) political spectrum. Actually all our politicians who play with anti-semitic ressentiments get that kind of negative echo (don´t know if one knows Möllemann here), which I think is a positive sign.
To his points, I´m still undecided if he´s just clumsy (as Roland said it) or very calculating. As said, I read his entire speech, that Jewish-Bolshevik part takes a lot of space, only at the end he makes that turn where he says "neither are a race of perpetrators." I should note that the sentence in German doesn´t mention "race" as such but "people"(Volk), which makes a difference IMO. This is a kind of equation I don´t like, even if it sounds positive at the first look, because it boils down to a simple "they´re all the same", which has a relativating effect when related to Nazi crimes. As said, for me it is difficult to decide what his intentions were (except the usual whining that "Germany has suffered enough" which is not uncommon in certain parts of the German conservatives).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
Now I can understand that you disagree - but I cant understand that you choose to disregard their valid concerns about antisemitism on such grounds. Are the only people who are entitled to discuss antisemitism those who share your views of the situation in the middle east? That seems to me a way to shut down debate, not to expand it. |
No, that's a different issue, although the groups usually overlap. Are the groups that support Israel's policies and complain about european antisemitism worried about antisemitism? I think that is a very small part of their agenda.
There was for example a conference between US and european mostly jewish groups, and the europeans warned against aggressive lobbying as that was certain to produce a negative reaction - just as it would from exile Cubans or buttplugged martians. We don't like aggressive special interest groups.
So what did the americans do? Start an aggressive campaign, eg Guliani's incredibly arrogant, ignorant and insulting conference speech. There comes the inevitable negative reaction, and woosha - evidence of more antisemitism. We had the same game with Waldheim, Haider etc. We've seen it with attacks on Jews in France - "you have to change your stance and media coverage on ISrael". Antisemitism is a PR tool for Israel, and a business tool for the belonging lobbying groups.
I think that say the german Zentralrat is genuine, though I disagree with their view of antisemitism as well as of Israel's policies. But as the default rule: anything associated with US lobbying groups (jewish or not) or Israeli government, I do not see as genuine.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
HershOstropoler
|
|
quote: Originally posted by lord of the mark
In the case of the ADL that is the Center of their agenda. And they have sometimes disagreed with Israeli policy where the foreign policiy of Israel and the interests of fighting antisemitism diverge - which happens not infrequently. |
I tend to give the ADL the benefit of the doubt. The WJC, on the other hand, is an example for making antisemitism a business. It's sad that the Wiesenthal center, which has done a lot of good in persecuting Nazi criminals, has now degenerated into that fold, apparently.
"Well youre entitled to do that if you wish."
I certainly do. The problem is that after some organisations cried wolf all the time, nobody will listen to the genuinely concerned when a real problem arises.
"And the spread of vicious antisemitic tropes in the European left as well."
What exactly do you mean by that?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|