 |
|
Minute Mirage
|
|
Helsinki
Aug 2003 time: 07:31
|
|
Also known as pod-booming, I believe. It's most useful when you have the PTS.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Minute Mirage
|
|
Helsinki
Aug 2003 time: 07:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The diplomat
Isn't that a cheat? |
In my opinion, no. If others feel differently, it should be specified before a multiplayer game whether this is to be accepted. But I don't think this is usually banned in MP.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Minute Mirage
In my opinion, no. If others feel differently, it should be specified before a multiplayer game whether this is to be accepted. But I don't think this is usually banned in MP. |
Its not in either the CGN or the apolyton tournament rules. There may be games that ban this but it usually don't come up. Realistically each new colony pod added beyond hab limits becomes a specialist and even if we are talking engineers, thats 3 econ and 2 labs-- You can get much the same benefit (5 energy) just building more and more crawlers.
And as I said before, pod booming below hab limits usually does not make sense with any faction that can reach +6 growth. You can usually time your stay in "Planned" with the building of an SP and the rushing of a bunch of units/facilities.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Minute Mirage
|
|
Helsinki
Aug 2003 time: 07:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
Realistically each new colony pod added beyond hab limits becomes a specialist and even if we are talking engineers, thats 3 econ and 2 labs-- You can get much the same benefit (5 energy) just building more and more crawlers. |
I can see a slight benefit here if you're short on space (no room for more crawlers) or the enemy is sniping your crawlers and you can't protect them.
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
And as I said before, pod booming below hab limits usually does not make sense with any faction that can reach +6 growth. You can usually time your stay in "Planned" with the building of an SP and the rushing of a bunch of units/facilities. |
I agree, pod booming is nothing compared to pop booming. Then again, I might build some colony pods when I'm pop booming and later add them to my bases in order to bypass base limits, but usually I'd use the pods to found more bases.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flubber
|
|
With a view of the Rockies
Aug 2000 time: 22:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Minute Mirage
I can see a slight benefit here if you're short on space (no room for more crawlers) or the enemy is sniping your crawlers and you can't protect them.
|
Point taken if running out of space but I can usually find a place for a trawler to go . . .
if an enemy is sniping at me, I doubt I would be using much resources to force an extra population point anywhere . My nice 2 borehole size 3 base would do much better to pump out a interceptor/ship/chopper per turn to go deal with whoever is harassing me.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Minute Mirage
|
|
Helsinki
Aug 2003 time: 07:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Flubber
Point taken if running out of space but I can usually find a place for a trawler to go . . .
if an enemy is sniping at me, I doubt I would be using much resources to force an extra population point anywhere . My nice 2 borehole size 3 base would do much better to pump out a interceptor/ship/chopper per turn to go deal with whoever is harassing me. |
I don't really disagree with you, I was merely trying to find a (hypothetical) situation where pod booming would be a good idea. Generally speaking, it doesn't seem like a good idea, unless you're playing a faction that can't pop boom easily.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Minute Mirage
|
|
Helsinki
Aug 2003 time: 07:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Vagabond
If you have Merchant Exchange, Supercollider and Theory of Everything in the same base, it's a good idea to pod-boom that base. |
Or you could build crawlers (or trawlers) and rehome them to that base. The crawlers cost three rows like colony pods, but they don't take citizens away from existing bases, nor do they require support. The new specialist would require 2 nutrients as support.
If we have a base with the Merchant Exchange and a Thermocline Transducer, and we're running FM, a trawler will bring in 6 energy, one more than an engineer. Of course, land based energy parks give even more energy, but they require more terraforming time. And if you have your headquarters in this base (as you should), you will lose no energy to inefficiency.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:31
|
|
quote: I know that some players did consider it a cheat to exceed hab dome or hab complex limits on the theory that you could avoid a game mechanism but that view never really took hold and the tactic is permitted in all PBEMs AFAIK |
It's not permited in the ACDG, as I was disappointed to find out.
If you are a pop boom impaired faction, and have the HGP, you can create an pepetual pod factory out of a size 4 base without using allocating energy to pysch. This is independant of the bureaucracy limit too.
Basically you can drive a size 4 base into golden age by setting two doctors. Say you've gotten to the 9th beaucracy limit. because 2 of your citizens are specialists you can only get 2 b-drones. With some holographic theatre and a tree farm it's possible to overcome those two b-drones.
In the size 4 base set 21 minerals per turn, give +2 nutrinents overall, and have the base enter golden age for a turn first. Then set the base to build a colony pod. It will build a colony pod every turn without you having to adjust the specialists anymore (didn't bother to figure out the turn sequence to explain why). This will allow those population boom impaired factions (with HGP) to create a pod every turn no matter how many b-drone warnings they have had.
I would go on more about pop booming, but I've realised all my other strategies on this subject have narrow time frames and are even more situation specific.
Last edited by Kody on 06-11-2003 at 04:57
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Minute Mirage
|
|
Helsinki
Aug 2003 time: 07:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kody
If you are a pop boom impaired faction, and have the HGP, you can create an pepetual pod factory out of a size 4 base without using allocating energy to pysch. This is independant of the bureaucracy limit too.
Basically you can drive a size 4 base into golden age by setting two doctors. Say you've gotten to the 9th beaucracy limit. because 2 of your citizens are specialists you can only get 2 b-drones. With some holographic theatre and a tree farm it's possible to overcome those two b-drones.
In the size 4 base set 21 minerals per turn, give +2 nutrinents overall, and have the base enter golden age for a turn first. Then set the base to build a colony pod. It will build a colony pod every turn without you having to adjust the specialists anymore (didn't bother to figure out the turn sequence to explain why). This will allow those population boom impaired factions (with HGP) to create a pod every turn no matter how many b-drone warnings they have had. |
That is a nice trick, especially since it requires no micromanagement once you've set up the base. Of course, it's no match for normal pop-booming, but I see that this strategy could be useful for the Hive.
quote: Originally posted by Kody
I would go on more about pop booming, but I've realised all my other strategies on this subject have narrow time frames and are even more situation specific. |
Well, I'd still be interested in hearing some or your tricks. Pop booming is such a big deal in the game, that any tips concerning it would be helpful. Of course, I presume your strategies are Hive- related, but I think the GA tricks could apply to other factions as well.
By the way, are you still in the ACDTG?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:31
|
|
I don't know if I should say anything about the other pop booming things, as they are currently in use.
I'm currently still performing consulting for the Hive. I'm hoping if I stay away from the hive long enough, I won't be needed for a critical time consuming role. When I no longer need to be constantly consulted, I'll consider rejoining.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Vagabond
|
 |
of realpolitik and counterpropaganda
Jan 1970 time: 05:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Minute Mirage
Or you could build crawlers (or trawlers) and rehome them to that base. The crawlers cost three rows like colony pods, but they don't take citizens away from existing bases, nor do they require support. The new specialist would require 2 nutrients as support.
|
As disscussed above, a huge problem with crawler is that you can't defend them as soon as Air Power becomes available.
Anyway, I prefer to use both pod-booming and crawlers when possible. Crawlers may be more effective short-term, but pod-booming looks more reliable and solid in the long run.
quote:
If we have a base with the Merchant Exchange and a Thermocline Transducer, and we're running FM, a trawler will bring in 6 energy, one more than an engineer. Of course, land based energy parks give even more energy, but they require more terraforming time. And if you have your headquarters in this base (as you should), you will lose no energy to inefficiency. |
How do you get 6? It's just 2+1(ME)+1(Free Market)=4. Perhaps, on elevations, it's 3+1+1=5. But not 6.
Besides, engineers bring that in irrespective of the social choices.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Minute Mirage
|
|
Helsinki
Aug 2003 time: 07:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by timotheus4
I rarely do the democracy/planned/creche thing, but rather just wait until I get the cloning vats. |
If you wait for the vats, you've waited much too long, IMO.
quote: Originally posted by The Vagabond As disscussed above, a huge problem with crawler is that you can't defend them as soon as Air Power becomes available.
Anyway, I prefer to use both pod-booming and crawlers when possible. Crawlers may be more effective short-term, but pod-booming looks more reliable and solid in the long run. |
Defending the crawlers might be difficult depending on the situation, but you don't need to have them aroung for a long time before they pay for themselves. Besides, you need crawlers for nutrients when you pod boom unless you want to use some of the new citizens as a workers instead of a specialists (inefficient).
quote: Originally posted by The Vagabond How do you get 6? It's just 2+1(ME)+1(Free Market)=4. Perhaps, on elevations, it's 3+1+1=5. But not 6.
Besides, engineers bring that in irrespective of the social choices. |
A trawler = a sea crawler.
3 energy for a tidal harness, 1 for the ME, 1 for a Thermocline Transducer (SMAX), 1 for FM. True, you may want to wait for Fusion before you build these, but it's not like you can get Engineers before then anyway. And even if you're not running FM, you get the same 5 energy as with an Engineer, but without the support of 2 nutrients.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
UnityScoutChopper
|
 |
Brno, Czech Republic
Oct 2000 time: 06:31
|
|
I seem to be in the minority here, for me the situation really is:
Why are there hab limits? This is a game mechanism to make hab facilities important (just as in all Civ games, incidentally).
What does pod booming do? At a certain, not tremendeously high cost, it makes this mechanism irrelevant.
To me, it is a loophole that breaks a game mechanism, and using it is an exploit.
But hey... in SP do whatever you want, it's no skin off my back. And in MP as long as we both can agree on the rules, then all exploits are OK as long as we know what's OK and isn't. (Nevertheless, there are standard "forbidden" exploits... I guess the real reason this one isn't is that in the end, it's not THAT powerful.)
USC
|
|
|  |
 |
|
The Vagabond
|
 |
of realpolitik and counterpropaganda
Jan 1970 time: 05:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Minute Mirage
A trawler = a sea crawler.
3 energy for a tidal harness, 1 for the ME, 1 for a Thermocline Transducer (SMAX), 1 for FM. True, you may want to wait for Fusion before you build these, but it's not like you can get Engineers before then anyway. And even if you're not running FM, you get the same 5 energy as with an Engineer, but without the support of 2 nutrients. |
Oh, I see. Never used trawlers. But defending trawlers should be a hell of a task. You don't need to wait until Air Power for them to become extremely vulnerable. Sea animals usually appear unannounced. I would hate to be rushing them all to safety any time an IoD appears on the horizon. Besides, as trawlers are more expensive than crawlers, losing one is more painful. Perhaps, an ideal place for trawlers would be a closed sea, but you can seldom find such a possibility.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Minute Mirage
|
|
Helsinki
Aug 2003 time: 07:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by timotheus4
Yet somehow I always survive the game without popbooming once. |
Do you mean single player? Considering that you can win the game with just one city, I don't find it surprising that you can "survive" the game against the AI without pop booming. Against a pop booming human opponent, I'd say you'd have serious problems.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|