Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > Wes Clark lays out Iraq plan
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (3): [ 1   2   3   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 21:59
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Wes Clark lays out Iraq plan Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
A new course needed in Iraq
By Wesley Clark, 11/6/2003

MY 34 YEARS in the Army taught me to steel my spine, but not my heart, whenever I hear news of American casualties. On Tuesday I read about Sergeant Ernest Bucklew, who was headed home to attend his mother's funeral when his Chinook helicopter was shot out of the sky en route to Baghdad. Fifteen American soldiers died alongside him.

For the sake of every member of our armed forces, we need a plan to end the conflict in Iraq. Retreat is not an option. Withdrawal would be a disaster for America, a tragedy for Iraq, and a crisis for the world. It would destroy our credibility, give terrorists a new haven, and throw the Middle East into greater turmoil. No matter how difficult it will be, we need a "success strategy."

Success won't be easy, but only success can honor the sacrifice of our soldiers and allow the troops to come home. Success means that Iraq is strong enough to sustain itself without outside forces. Success means that representative government has taken root. Success means that Iraq's economy and civil society are healthy again.

Congress just gave the administration an $87 billion check to continue down the path that we're on. But President Bush still has no strategy to succeed. I do. Here's my "success strategy":

End the American monopoly.

We must call a summit of the leaders we've alienated, the people whose advice we've scorned, the organizations whose assistance we've turned down. Out of this gathering, we can build a new organization to replace the Coalition Provisional Authority and internationalize the face of the occupation.

To guide the reconstruction of Iraq, we need a civilian from an allied country. That civilian official would report to an international council, composed of representatives from nations that support our efforts to build a democratic Iraq.

As we saw in the Balkans, when we share power, other countries share our burden. I would transform the military occupation into a NATO operation with US forces in charge. With US command, NATO authority, and UN endorsement, other NATO countries would send troops, and Arab countries would also step in.

Find the right force mix.

The more conventional forces we have, the more logistics we need. The more unarmored Humvees on patrol, the more unnecessary American deaths from roadside bombs.

Better border protection.

To stanch the flow of foreign jihadists into Iraq, we must seal the borders. That requires assistance from Iraq's neighbors. Using carrots and sticks, we can persuade these countries to cooperate.

Secure ammunition.

Weapons dumps throughout Iraq are unguarded. It is estimated that 500,000 tons of ammunition is still not secure. We must patrol these sites and destroy these weapons.

More intelligence resources.

Success in Iraq depends on developing good information and a good rapport with civilians. Right now too many of our linguists and intelligence experts are working on the search for weapons of mass destruction. International inspectors should take over that search, which would free up enough experts to help us track down those who are killing our soldiers and creating chaos.

Formidable Iraqi security forces.

We should recall the Iraqi Army to duty right now. If given good pay, good training, and solid background checks, Iraqi civilians can also help fill the intelligence and security gap.

Give the Iraqis a rising stake in our success.

It would be wrong to transfer authority to the Iraqis before they are ready to succeed, but we can give Iraqis more control over their destiny. The administration says the Iraqis can't have a sovereign government without a constitution. This is backwards. Iraqis, appointed by representatives from Iraq's 50 elected regional councils, should name an interim government even while a constitution emerges. That is what our Founding Fathers did.

If we give the interim government control over oil revenues and transfer authority on an ongoing basis, it will be easier for the Iraqi people to see that those blowing up pipelines are sabotaging their future. If we give civilians a stake in stemming the violence, they will help us solve this problem.

As of today, 383 of our soldiers have been killed in action.

When he died, Sergeant Bucklew was only 33. In Fort Carson, Colo., his wife and two sons are grieving. Not a single soldier from Fort Carson died before May 1, when President Bush declared an end to major combat. More than 20 Fort Carson soldiers have died since.

It is unconscionable to allow our country to continue staggering down the track that we're on in Iraq. Bush keeps saying we need to "stay the course." We need to change the course. With a strategy to succeed, our armed forces will turn things around.

Wesley Clark, a retired general, is a Democratic candidate for president.

© Copyright 2003 Globe Newspaper Company.

http://www.boston.com/news/globe/ed...needed_in_iraq/


Discuss...

Q Cubed is offline Q Cubed
Prince
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:02 Visit Q Cubed's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

first of the democrats to have a coherent plan.

that counts for something.

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:03 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

Change the course, to what?

I hate people that whine and moan, yet offer up no viable alternatives.
Not even after the fact.

Japher is offline Japher
Prince
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002
time: 05:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Remove this text

"I love the smell of napalm in the morning..."

Why does he remind me of that guy?

Wesley Clark should of learned that in the military you don't question authority, and that you trust in your best men to do the best job. It ain't like Bush is the one drawing up the strategies, we have ppl in the Pentagon to do that.

I don't like Clark, though I like his attitude (seems to be an all-American), but I still ain't voting for him.

Q Cubed is offline Q Cubed
Prince
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:05 Visit Q Cubed's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

why isn't allowing international weapons inspectors to free up our intel to protect our boys viable?

Jac de Molay is offline Jac de Molay
Prince
Detroit
Sep 2001
time: 05:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#6 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

Some of the ideas are good. Others, like "sealing" the iraq border and the ammo dumps, are unworkable

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:08 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#7 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

The "weapons inspectors" weren't worth anything; and if they had been, they were still not given the information BY HUSSEIN, to do their job.
And it still was 12 years late in coming.

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#8 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

Double post.

Last edited by Oerdin on 06-11-2003 at 22:38

Sava is offline Sava
King
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#9 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by SlowwHand
I hate people that whine and moan, yet offer up no viable alternatives.
then you must like Clark... he lists his policy right here...

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:37
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#10 Report this post to a moderator
Tired of ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Japher
It ain't like Bush is the one drawing up the strategies, we have ppl in the Pentagon to do that.


Japher you are wrong. The administration is the one who's made EVERY SINGLE one of the political choices which have made things so difficult. By refusing to give concessions to the UN or to allies who would, potentially, be risking the lives of thousands of soldier the administration has created the current mess. For all of his failures Clinton was a good diplomat who was skilled at building consensus & coalitions. Bush is the antithesis of a good diplomat and that's why I feel he is unsuitable for handling a situation like this.

Over all he's doing a worse job the LBJ did in Vietnam. LBJ at least was able to get large numbers of countries to contribute significant amounts of troops and to build South Vietnam into a creditable military and political power. By this time in the Vietnam War we knew the enemy's order of battle, their leadership structure, where they were getting their arms & money, and what their political goals were. Today we don't know any of this with certainty in Iraq.

Clark has it right. We need to eat crow for Bush's mistake of insulting allies then we need to give up a share of the power to allies if we want them to help secure Iraq. Plus we need to have elections in Iraq with in 3-6 months. Why? Because right now every time the power goes out or the water doesn’t work the people blame America for not doing its job. If we had a functioning local government then the people would have someone else to blame all of their petty problems upon instead of us. Plus the key to defeating guerrilla insurgencies is to 1) build up a network of local informants so you will have the intelligence to root them out, and 2) to satisfy enough of their under laying demands so that the people will cease to support them and instead begin to report them to the police and/or military. There is no way we, as foreigners, will be able to do as good (not to mention a better job) a job at either of these tasks as a local government.

Japher is offline Japher
Prince
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002
time: 05:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 22:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#11 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
Japher you are wrong.


Drats...

Oerdin: when are you going to Monterey? If you ever have free time( yeah right) let me know, or if you want to go AWOL I can be there in an hour...

lord of the mark is offline lord of the mark
Emperor
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#12 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin


Over all he's doing a worse job the LBJ did in Vietnam. LBJ at least was able to get large numbers of countries to contribute significant amounts of troops and to build South Vietnam into a creditable military and political power. By this time in the Vietnam War we knew the enemy's order of battle, their leadership structure, where they were getting their arms & money, and what their political goals were. Today we don't know any of this with certainty in Iraq.

.


1. large numbers of countries - er Australia, Thailand, and South Korea. Three. Compared to that Britain, Italy, Poland, Ukraine, Netherlands look pretty good.


2. Order of battle - we knew the VC order of battle - every guerrilla and sympathizer in every town and city? We're facing several thousand insurgents in Iraq. There were probably at least as many in VN we didnt know about (6 months in, 1965)- of course there were many MORE that we DID know about - cause that was on a much larger scale.

3. Political goals - er thats, right, cause the NVA and VC were a serious political movement that HAD political goals, which appealed to a very large portion of the South Viet Namese people, and who publicized their goals in order to win the hearts and minds of said people. The insurgents in Iraq are NOT publicizing any political goals - as far as I can tell because such goals as they possess have little or NO appeal to the Iraqi people. Their goal is not to WIN OVER the Iraqi people but to frighten them out of supporting the coalition. Dont expect any "model villages" from these folks. The Iraqis already now what "model" to expect.

lord of the mark is offline lord of the mark
Emperor
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:21
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#13 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin


Japher you are wrong. The administration is the one who's made EVERY SINGLE one of the political choices which have made things so difficult. By refusing to give concessions to the UN or to allies who would, potentially, be risking the lives of thousands of soldier the administration has created the current mess. For all of his failures Clinton was a good diplomat who was skilled at building consensus & coalitions. Bush is the antithesis of a good diplomat and that's why I feel he is unsuitable for handling a situation like this.


Bush is a poor diplomat - I can buy that. But i see no evidence that Clark is a good one. and i doubt a good diplomat could have gotten France and Russia along in any case.

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:22 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#14 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

Sava, do you know the meaning of rhetoric?

For instance, Clark saying "We should recall the Iraqi Army to duty right now. If given good pay, good training, and solid background checks, Iraqi civilians can also help fill the intelligence and security gap."

Very agile-minded.
Like Bush hasn't been calling for this from the beginning.

Can you not find another dead horse to beat?
This one is unrecognizeable by now.

Az is offline Az
King
MACEDONIA - It's the name of the sovereign country to the north of Greece
Apr 2000
time: 07:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:33
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#15 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

some good stuff. some unworkable stuff.

MichaeltheGreat is offline MichaeltheGreat
Apolyton Grand Executioner
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:34
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#16 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

quote:
Originally posted by Jac de Molay
Some of the ideas are good. Others, like "sealing" the iraq border and the ammo dumps, are unworkable


Oh bullshit. Do you honestly think that with well over a hundred thousand troops in theater, we can't blow a hundred ****ing ammo dumps, and secure them until we can blow them?

Failure to do so as a first priority is one of the stupidest acts of the administration yet. "Gee, maybe there will be some evidence there of what we claimed we already knew, so let's not get around to those until we have time to look at every square inch"

We have ordnance disposal and CW handling units available in the US that haven't been called yet.

MichaeltheGreat is offline MichaeltheGreat
Apolyton Grand Executioner
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#17 Report this post to a moderator
Avatar Enlargement: We've got the solution

quote:
Originally posted by SlowwHand
For instance, Clark saying "We should recall the Iraqi Army to duty right now. If given good pay, good training, and solid background checks, Iraqi civilians can also help fill the intelligence and security gap."

Very agile-minded.
Like Bush hasn't been calling for this from the beginning.


If Bush has been calling for this, then why hasn't he dealt with the subordinates who have refused to carry out his orders? Or who is actually in charge up there?

quote:

Can you not find another dead horse to beat?
This one is unrecognizeable by now.


This is a very live horse, Tex. How many more will get zipped and shipped this month?

lord of the mark is offline lord of the mark
Emperor
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:38
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#18 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by Q Cubed
first of the democrats to have a coherent plan.

that counts for something.


what Clark is saying in November:

"To guide the reconstruction of Iraq, we need a civilian from an allied country."

Joe Lieberman called for that in FEBRUARY!


http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/w...6¬Found=true

lord of the mark is offline lord of the mark
Emperor
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:39
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#19 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by Azazel
some good stuff. some unworkable stuff.


yup.

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:42 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#20 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Michael, you spout the same rhetoric bullshit.
You actually mean to sit there and say Bush hasn't been trying to get the Iraqi law enforement to take charge?
Again, that's bullshit.
FINALLY, they are, to a degree.

lord of the mark is offline lord of the mark
Emperor
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:43
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#21 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat


If Bush has been calling for this, then why hasn't he dealt with the subordinates who have refused to carry out his orders? Or who is actually in charge up there?




theyre calling up former members of the Iraqi army as INDIVIDUALS for the various forces in Iraq. They're NOT calling up units. Since the units dont exist. They fell apart during the initial attack.


see the following from a high level CPA official (formerly of the Clinton admin) on why retaining the Iraqi army was never possible.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dy...4-2003Nov4.html

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:48 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#22 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

Actually, you piss me off MUCH worse than Sava does.
Sava is just this side of brain-dead. He can't help it.

You, on the other hand, have said we need to stay until it's cleaned up; but no matter what happens, it's Bush's fault.
That's utter craola.

I tell you what, any respect I had for the Iraqi people is dying fast.
Sonsof*****es need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, and change their soiled panties.

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:49
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#23 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by Japher
Oerdin: when are you going to Monterey? If you ever have free time( yeah right) let me know, or if you want to go AWOL I can be there in an hour...


They changed stuff around on me last week and decided to send me to Iraq. Currently, I'm supposed to go to Fort Carson, Colorado for two weeks starting this Sunday then I'll be at Fort Hunter-Liggett, California until the 21st of December. I'm not sure how much free time I will have at either of those places. From what I understand the days will be pretty full.

Still, I'm going to keep updating this thread.

lord of the mark is offline lord of the mark
Emperor
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:31
  Old Post 06-11-2003 23:57
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#24 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

quote:
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Actually, you piss me off MUCH worse than Sava does.
Sava is just this side of brain-dead. He can't help it.

You, on the other hand, have said we need to stay until it's cleaned up; but no matter what happens, it's Bush's fault.
That's utter craola.

I tell you what, any respect I had for the Iraqi people is dying fast.
Sonsof*****es need to pull themselves up by their bootstraps, and change their soiled panties.



From HealingIraq, an Iraqi blog

"If you think that Iraqis aren't doing enough, then you're being mislead by your media. Thousands of people are applying to be members of IP, FPS, and the civil defense force. They are begging for the security to be in their hands. We know how to handle those scum. The Americans are more interested in being nice and all about human rights and free speech and stuff. We have our own Law and court systems which we can use but the CPA won't allow us to. They are being too lenient and forgiving on our expence. If you think that is what is required to build a successful democracy then you're too deluded. You don't know the first thing about the Iraqi society.

Iraqis are providing intelligence to the CPA hourly. Just ask the soldiers here. Iraqis are cooperating in every way they can. They're losing their lives for it goddammit. If you aren't seeing it on tv, it isn't my ****ing problem."

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:31
  Old Post 07-11-2003 00:11
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#25 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by MichaeltheGreat
Oh bullshit. Do you honestly think that with well over a hundred thousand troops in theater, we can't blow a hundred ****ing ammo dumps, and secure them until we can blow them?


To be fair NPR is reporting that Iraq, which is around 1/10 the size of the US has approximately as much munitions as are in the entire US. We're talking about a place saturated in arms and ammunition. The UXO teams are blowing them up but, if the new reports are valid, at a pace which will take years to complete the job.

Bremer even got on NPR and admited that less then 25% of the ammo dumps have been secured. The rest just are sitting there waiting for people to pick them up and take them home.

lord of the mark is offline lord of the mark
Emperor
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000
time: 00:31
  Old Post 07-11-2003 00:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#26 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Originally posted by Q Cubed
first of the democrats to have a coherent plan.

that counts for something.



Lieberman on reconstructing Iraq (from July)

Q Cubed is offline Q Cubed
Prince
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999
time: 23:31
  Old Post 07-11-2003 00:49 Visit Q Cubed's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#27 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

huh. missed this. oh well.

second democrat to have a coherent plan. i guess that might count for something.

MichaeltheGreat is offline MichaeltheGreat
Apolyton Grand Executioner
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 07-11-2003 06:32
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#28 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by SlowwHand
Michael, you spout the same rhetoric bullshit.
You actually mean to sit there and say Bush hasn't been trying to get the Iraqi law enforement to take charge?
Again, that's bullshit.
FINALLY, they are, to a degree.


To "take charge" of what? We sent 'em home without pay, then we decided that we wanted to train some of them to work with our units, under our authority, subject to our rules and terms and conditions.

Bush has done plenty of steppin and fetchin about how the Iraqis should assume responsibility (when we've determined their available means and authroity) for failures for which US is obligated as an occupying power under decades old international law. He sure as hell hasn't wanted them to "take charge" of anything, except if and when convenient to American interest, and in the manner and for the duration of convenience to American interests.

If we didn't want those responsibilities, then maybe we shouldn't have invaded and taken over their ****ing country in the first place.

MichaeltheGreat is offline MichaeltheGreat
Apolyton Grand Executioner
mooning the house that Ruth built.
Oct 1999
time: 21:31
  Old Post 07-11-2003 06:36
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#29 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

quote:
Originally posted by Oerdin


To be fair NPR is reporting that Iraq, which is around 1/10 the size of the US has approximately as much munitions as are in the entire US. We're talking about a place saturated in arms and ammunition. The UXO teams are blowing them up but, if the new reports are valid, at a pace which will take years to complete the job.

Bremer even got on NPR and admited that less then 25% of the ammo dumps have been secured. The rest just are sitting there waiting for people to pick them up and take them home.


If they're out in the boonies, an F-16 and a couple of GBU's should do the trick. It's not like it's hard to blow the **** up. And considering what the *******s can do with it, don't you think it's a bit stupid to leave these sites sitting around unsecured? If you had to deploy another division of troops to secure them, deploy the ****ing division, rather than make this **** available to the goddamned enemy free for the taking.

Oerdin is offline Oerdin
King
of Internet Music.
Sep 2001
time: 21:31
  Old Post 07-11-2003 06:45
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#30 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

I agree we should have secured or destroyted them the moment they were found. However Bush's administration isn't know for long or even intermediate planning much less clear thinking. He bungled it but it probably would have been imp[ossible to secure all of the sights. Still, leaving 80% of the arms and munitions just sitting there unguarded and undestroyed is completely irresponsible.

Now would you like to hear something else irresponsible? Rumsfield announced that in the next few months the US is going to cut back it's forces in Iraq by 25%. Why would the US want to decrease the number of soldiers in Iraq so dramatically when by every report lawlessness and insecurity are the rule of the day? Why because the White House is worrying about next year's election and so they are afraid the constant bad news and body bags might dampen Bush Jr's reelection chances.

It is totally unacceptable, in my mind, that Bush can talk out of one side of his mouth about staying the course and increasing security while ordering large scale cut backs which directly controdict what he's say.

Last edited by Oerdin on 07-11-2003 at 07:06

 
Pages (3): [ 1   2   3   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31.
Apolyton Time is 00:31.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0638 seconds (92.62% PHP - 7.38% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net