 |
|  |
 |
|
Yolky
|
|
Ontario Canada
Oct 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
Will the memeber of Firaxis signan agreement like politicians did here in Ontario (stating they would do this or that, like a contract)
What I am asking is that they do what they said will do. As we know from Civ3 alot of things weren't there that were stated would be there(not promised but stated), and not release it in a later patch or expansion pack.
I am sick and tired of buying games and then later have to download a patch for a finished game.
Let them sign an agreement for us that when they make Civ 4 it will have what they said will have.
eg, don't say there will be multiplayer and just before the game is released that it will be on a future patch, then later it will be on an expansion.
Maybe this way we won't be so dissapointed when Civ4 comes out like Civ3 did.
What do you guys think?
Davor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Yolky
|
|
Ontario Canada
Oct 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MarkG
never was it said that MP would be a patch....
beyond that, what you ask cant be done.... |
I could be wrong but am shure either by reading the forums or somewhere in a magizine article that it might be in a patch. This was just a month before the game came out.
Why couldn't it be done? Politicanse do it (at least in Ontario)
I was just thinking if they did this it could be a new trend in games so people get a complete game when they buy it. A patch is a fix that they didn't fix during development and fixed it after being shipped.
If all those fixes they made for Civ3 weren't fixes but enhancements then it's not a patch. I forgot the name for that.
Davor
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:31
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Alexander's Horse
was there a problem with RoN? |
runs like a wounded animal. poor video card support.
even when I managed to get a good frame rate it was disappointing, probably will just collect dust on my shelf.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:31
|
|
Welcome to the corporate world.
A company is under no obligation to adhere to its original plan for a product. While saying Civ3 would have MP and not including it (and not saying that until the release) was incredibly bad from a PR and maybe ethics standpoint, I don't think there was any malfeasance.
However, so long as the developer is up front with design changes before release, such an agreement would be unneccesary and, in fact, probably detrimental. Being hamstrung by original intents is not a good idea for a software designer. Designing software is built a great deal on flexibility, after all. The simple fact is that initial plans are often based on some pie-in-the-sky visions, but once the actual coding starts, stark realism sets in.
While I think really good initial planning can avoid most problems in this regard (and I honestly think Civ3 suffered from poor initial planning and a scattershot "we'll try to please everyone!" mentality), changes in design and intent of function will be inevitable.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:31. Apolyton Time is 00:31. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|