Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > AC-General/Help/Strategy-Archive > Comparison game for testing different strategies
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread    < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
Minute Mirage is offline Minute Mirage
Prince
Helsinki
Aug 2003
time: 07:32
  Old Post 15-11-2003 04:18
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#1 Report this post to a moderator
Comparison game for testing different strategies Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

When I play SP, it's mostly for trying out different strategies and trying to improve my game. However, the conditions may vary wildly from game to game making comparisons between different games very hard. Additionally, I'd like to compare my games to others', since that's how you really can learn new things and improve your game.

For this reason, I played a game from the starting save of Sikander's builder game and posted a thread about my experiences here. I had a lot of fun playing the game, since a lot of people had played the game from the same starting position and I could compare my progress to theirs. In essence, the game stayed fun because I wasn't competing against the lousy AI, but against myself and the other people who had played the game before.

However, there were a few things that made comparisons difficult with Sikander's game. First off, the unity pods provide a great deal of randomness, especially in the form of Alien Artifacts. Secondly, the AI's behaviour is unpredictable and it can lead to huge differences between games, mostly because of trading or stealing techs.

Now, what I propose is creating a podless map that could be used for comparisons between different players and playing styles. Since the focus would be on building, there should be ample room for expansion and no AIs nearby. I would also prohibit trading or stealing techs with the AI, but otherwise it should be acceptable to enter a pact or treaty with them in order to gain commerce income. The specifics of the map can be decided later if there's any interest in this type of thing.

Archaic is offline Archaic
King
Washed up SMAC/X University Specialist
Nov 2001
time: 15:32
  Old Post 15-11-2003 06:26 Visit Archaic's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#2 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Why should trading or stealing techs from the AI be prohibited? Diplomatic skill with the AI is still an important part of the SP game. It's unpredictable, yes, but it's an acceptable variation in my mind.

Minute Mirage is offline Minute Mirage
Prince
Helsinki
Aug 2003
time: 07:32
  Old Post 15-11-2003 06:51
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#3 Report this post to a moderator
Increase Your PM Length

quote:
Originally posted by Archaic
Why should trading or stealing techs from the AI be prohibited? Diplomatic skill with the AI is still an important part of the SP game. It's unpredictable, yes, but it's an acceptable variation in my mind.


You could just as well say that knowing when and where to pop pods and going hunting for them is an important part of the game, even though it is unpredictable. And I fully agree with that and your comment about the diplomatic skills.

However, allowing these things makes comparing the differences between various strategies and players a lot harder, at least as far as pure building is concerned. If the first player produces 10% more labs per turn in his game, but the second player manages to probe three techs in one turn from an AI, the second one is far ahead in the game, even though the first one might have played a better game otherwise. And this doesn't even mean that the first player doesn't understand the importance of probes -- it might just be that the AI didn't research those techs in his game for some reason.

Googlie is offline Googlie
Emperor
Commanding Officer, CRYPTEIA
Apr 1999
time: 21:32
  Old Post 15-11-2003 08:26 Visit Googlie's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#4 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

A variation on the comparison game that I've played with several players is a reverse faction matched pair. By that I mean, eg, MM and I would play a game with, say, MM as the Gaians and me as Morgan, then a parallel game (different map, but same AI) with MM as Morgan and me as the Gaians.

It's a really neat way of comparing playing skills, and I learned oodles through this (my partners were Vel, in maybe the first parallel game, big_canuck, RedFred, Darius, from all of whom I learned much, as I said.)

We didn't disable pods, or ban tech trading (it's a good way to learn how to play the aliens, too - play two games, one as Marr and t'other as H'minee - they play very differently when you're against another human player in permanent vendetta)

Just a thought

G.

Minute Mirage is offline Minute Mirage
Prince
Helsinki
Aug 2003
time: 07:32
  Old Post 15-11-2003 14:03
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#5 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

That's sounds like an interesting idea, Googlie, and it's probably a good way to learn to play other factions. However, if I understood correctly it's a PBEM, which is really not what I'm looking for. Don't get me wrong, I think multiplayer is the real SMAC(X), but I'd like to test the strategies in single player first.

  < Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32.
Apolyton Time is 00:32.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0330 seconds (85.21% PHP - 14.79% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net