 |
|
darok
|
|
Thanks for all the work into improving the game. I just want to ask if the 1.07 version of the AU C3C mod with the cavalry changes is available for download yet? The link is only for 1.06.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Risa
|
|
I spot a bug. (Or an undocumented feature?)
The scout unit is no longer able to upgrade to explorer. It was first discovered in AU505 game, and also exists in v1.07's .biq file.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pfeffersack
|
|
Two ideas, which could perhaps fit in the AU mod:
1) We all know how bad the AI is at making naval invasions.The main problem is it rarely uses more than one transport ship for invasions, which results in very few landed units.Since Conquests this is even worse, because capacity of modern transport has dropped from 8 to 6.A partial solution for this increasing capacity of all transports by a fix factor (say +100% - 400%, depending on the kind of map or scenario.For mods close to stock rules, a more conservative value is usually better).This leads to bigger AI invasions, especially on higher difficulty where the AI has enough units.
2. I tried recently to win agame via score and searched for ways to max it out.I read an article about "milking" strategies, including a note about the unusefulness of Future Tech (because its contribution to score is very low).Wouldn't it be good to provide the player with an alternative to milking and turning research to 0 after researching the last useful tech? There is no way to improve the score value of future tech, but we could drop its research cost - then every future tech would only take 1 or at least very few turns to research and you could get more points out of it.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
punkbass2000
|
 |
Waterloo, ON, Canada
Feb 2002
time: 00:32
|
|
Minimum research time is four turns. If you could get four-turn research at ~10% funding, though, that might be worthwhile. I'm not a milker, so I don't really know. For the first proposal, I worry whether or not that would be to the player's advantage just as much, if not more, than the AI's. The AI rarely invades intercontinentally before Caravels, IME, so I would definitely leave Galleys and Curraghs the same.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Pfeffersack
|
|
Ok, I had forgotten for the moment there is a minimum research time (had dropped that in RaR since a long a time ago;-) in stock rules, but 4 turns at 10% looks good.Guess I will mod cheaper Future Tech in my next AU game, to see how cheap it has to be (will start with 200; if this is to cheap I will try 300 next time)
About bigger capacity transports, you are possibly right about galleys.My tests for RaR on this subject have shown that, as you said, the AI tends to use it more the occassional from the MidA on.So in the ancient age it might work heavy in the human players favor, but after that IMHO things changes.The only advantage for the human player is needing less ships if invading, which isn't a so big deal, while the AIs are getting a serious advantage if it comes to war.Not so much directly against the human player, which is able to cope with that danger easily by intercepting transports etc. (another change which is helpful in this context is cheking the "needs naval escort" flag for galleons etc., if the AI tends to neclect escorts for transport ships - we have that problem in RaR) or at least beating of an even larger invasion force...its versus other AI players which aren't located on the same land mass.They are able to bring enough troops to conquer smaller to midsized islands and even erase smaller and backward civs completly.So the change leads to stronger AI superpowers.
I have added a minimap from a RaR Emperor game.Might be difficult to compare stock rules or the AU mod with RaR in this subject (sucessful conquering is supported in RaR by weaker stats of defending units and some more changes), but you can see the effect of bigger transports clearly.
Map Legend (arrows mark invasions): Grey India has took out the French and Persia in the West, parts of Korea (western part of the brown color Japanese island)and some minor islands.The green Atztecs attemped to
conquer purple Ethiopia with the help of Spain(red) and landed more than a dozen armors, only my intervention stopped them after taking some cities and the Ethiopians found time to recover.
 Attachment: invasion.jpg
This has been downloaded 152 time(s).
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001
time: 06:32
|
|
How can I build the SPHQ? The civilopedia says, it has been moved to Communism, I am communistic and have Espionage, however it does not appear as option.
Overall I am pleased with the AU mod. It plays out smoothly and tries to lighten all the bugs left forever in C3C. I'm having a nice thematic game, the first full Civ3 game since a year. Not with the original AU mod, but with the AU "fun" mod, which is the AU C3C mod 1.07 with all resources back to PTW frequency and Demigod replaced by Mystic Hero. All else left as it is.
I am playing Russia/USSR on a large map with 12 civs, and my goal was to avoid my usual choice of governments (Republic/Democracy) in favor of something new for me (not for you, I know, I know): Monarchy and Communism.
There are a few things I want to mention nevertheless: First, I miss the usual diversity of governments. Every single AI civ goes the way Republic/Democracy, except the backwards ones, who are stuck at their own island and are Monarchies. This may be intended, but it looks somehow boring. I don't know if this is only in my game or a general symptome. Second, wow, Cossacks are powerful now with blitz, as opposed to Light Cavalries, who are pretty weak. Not too powerful by chance? Third, I applaud the work you did with armies. First I was upset, that I can load only a single unit in it, but after a while I got used to it and like the effect, that it blocks the AI from making his beloved Knight/Infantry/Swordsman army (you get the picture). But I think, T will miss his mixed armies.
I'm back to my game. It's fun. I am in the early modern age, this is usually the point, where I bail out through UN. Not in this game, though. Space race is disabled, and I want to play it to the end of the tech tree.
Da sdrawstwujet Kommunisticheskaya Partiya welikogo Lenina! Wperyod k kommunismu! 
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Modo44
|
 |
in western Poland
Jul 2004
time: 06:32
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Ralph
How can I build the SPHQ? The civilopedia says, it has been moved to Communism, I am communistic and have Espionage, however it does not appear as option. |
In the AU Mod, SPHQ is only available in Fascism. It's a bug in the Civilopedia for the SPHQ. It should read: "moved from Communism to Fascism". It shows correctly in the "ALLOWS" field in the Civilopedia for Fascism.
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Ralph
There are a few things I want to mention nevertheless: First, I miss the usual diversity of governments. Every single AI civ goes the way Republic/Democracy, except the backwards ones, who are stuck at their own island and are Monarchies. |
You might see some in Feudalism later. I don't know why, but sometimes the AI just likes it, the small ones more often than the big guys. You will see Communism too, as soon as they get it, and get into a long war.
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Ralph
This may be intended, but it looks somehow boring. I don't know if this is only in my game or a general symptome. |
It is normal, and good for the AI. Republic is the best overall government, and Democracy is very good, when you have a quick transition (like the AI has on higher difficulty levels). How is this different from stock, by the way? It seems the AI will almost always go Despotism -> Republic -> Democracy, if at peace - just as often with stock rules, as with the AU Mod.
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Second, wow, Cossacks are powerful now with blitz, as opposed to Light Cavalries, who are pretty weak. Not too powerful by chance? |
Why? Is it bad for an UU to be powerful? There are even stronger ones, and very weak ones as well. The strongest argument, lately, was to preserve the game feeling of stock rules. This means leaving strong UUs strong, and weak UUs weak. I mean, think of the F-15. 
quote:
Originally posted by Sir Ralph
Da sdrawstwujet Kommunisticheskaya Partiya welikogo Lenina! Wperyod k kommunismu! |
Oww, that hurt.  I mean, rule the world, comrade!
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Modo44
|
|
in western Poland
Jul 2004
time: 06:32
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by TechWins
I'm in my game right now using the AU Mod v1.07, and I'm experiencing a very strange bug in all of my cities. The Cathedral is almost taking the cost of the Colosseum and the Colosseum is taking the cost of the Cathedral, but I don't know if that's precisely what is happening. I checked the biq file of the mod, and the Cathedral shows cost of 16 and the Colosseum shows cost of 11. The civilopedia represents them numbers accurately, as well. Has any been else noticed this bug, because up till now before using this mod I've never seen this happen. Below is a pic to help describe: |
I think this is not a bug. I think you are simply playing a Religious civ, in which case a Cathedral has a cost of 80 Shields (half price), while a Colosseum still takets 110 to finish.
Last edited by Modo44 on 27-03-2005 at 04:05
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32.
Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
05-10-2004 22:22
Attachment: 
|
