 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Enigma_Nova
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Japher
Do you not like living in a house compared to a cave, reading by electric lights instead of candles, having warmth to fight of the cold, being able to travel 1000s of miles within a day, amongst all the other countless luxuries you have? |
Aside from the many miles thing...
Yes Greed is a constant, and that stuff sounds good, but it's not as unidimensional as you make it seem.
Perhaps not all of us want an SUV today and a flooded house tomorrrow.
quote: It really sickens me when I see a "hippie" in manufactured clothes skimming a paper at a Starbucks just before they get in their car to go up to Wilits to protest, then head back to their manufactured home, flip on a light switch eat some soup from a can and turn in under the roar of an electric furnace... |
And you... watch all of this. Does this not make you a stalker?
quote: The sight of the future is not in the hands of conservation, but in the trust of innovation. |
The Future ideally lies not with the spouting of propagandic bullshit (but practically is based on it )
EDIT: Stupid friggin smileys
Last edited by Enigma_Nova on 03-12-2003 at 19:14
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Jon Miller
|
|
quote: Originally posted by laurentius
The FACT is that the US pulled out of the treaty because of economical reasons. The fact is that the Bush administration just doesnt respect any international treaty to be made or that have been made decades ago.
It is like a classroom. The US is like the best pupil that turns into puberty, becoming a big fat man who can beat anybody. He knows this. So one day he simply says that he is not going to play by the rules anymore. So what happens then? The good guys are a little ashamed and confused. But the other airheads(russia) follow the big fat guys example. At the end nobody respects the rules anymore and in this example eventually the whole class is going to be shipped to an island and to start a game called Battle Royale. |
no
we just do not do things that are not in our best interest
the US government thought so during Clinton's Administration, and thinks so now
I mean, it would benefit the world if the US gave all the nations of the world free money
but it sure wouldn't benefit the US any, and it would be right for us to not be a part of that international treaty
similiarly with Kyoto
Jon Miller
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Japher
|
 |
Ook! Ook! Ack! Ack! Ack!
Jun 2002 time: 05:32
|
|
quote: Yes Greed is a constant, and that stuff sounds good, but it's not as unidimensional as you make it seem. Perhaps not all of us want an SUV today and a flooded house tomorrrow. |
Your saying not everyone is greedy? Everyone wants a home and the comfort it brings, just no one is ready to accept the sacrifices that must be made to supply this to the world. Note: every one has needs, it is the level/quantity/quality of these needs that perpetuate greedy. Polution would exist regardless.
quote: And you... watch all of this. Does this not make you a stalker? |
only when their cute ... My wife is a hippy turned republican thanks to me. I have been to many protest, concerts, gathering, the like, where these peacenicks sit around and whine. I use to do the same thing until I wisened up one day and realized that we can have both and that I can contribute to that; comfort and safety, yet sitting around and doing nothing accomplishes nothing.
That's why I got a degree in Chemical Engineering with a specialization in Waste/waste water management. I study alt. energy sources, catalysist, watershed management, and environmental conservation. I also support the lumber industry and work and support manufacturing industries, why? Because these industries aren't going to shoot themselves in the foot and destroy what makes them money. EPA regulations are always increasing and fines are always pouring in (showing that they are poluting too much). Of which, many millions of dollars go into development, optimization, and renovation of old facilities and processes to prevent this pollution. Such things would happen or exist if these companies could not continue to pollute and make money.
quote: The Future ideally lies not with the spouting of propagandic bullshit (but practically is based on it ) |
Exactly, and that is why the Kyoto Treaty sucks, because it is based on propagandic bullshit. It stalls the problem, but does nothing to encourage the solution nor does is supply an outlet from which the solution can be found.
Necessity is NOT the mother of invention, competition is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
The vice economy of Russia, Mukhamed Tsikhanov, has just denied that Russia has decided to say no to the Kyoto Treaty.
This contradicts what economic advisor to Putin, Andrej Illarinov said at a press meeting yesterday.
Tsikhanov says that no decision has in fact been reached yet. Putin is silent on the issue.
Well obviously something has happened, but it is not clear what it is.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
But, it is clear to me from reading posts here on Apolyton that leftists outside the US tend to think that US corporations run the Republican party and control the US government. |
Not neccesarily all corporations. Ted Turner and Bill Gates are left of the republicans, are they not. I think leftists generally believe that the oil business is closely tied to the republicans. Or more generally the 'old industry' boys are supporting the Republicans, while the 'new economy' boys are supporting the Democratic Party.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ned
|
 |
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999 time: 21:32
|
|
Tripledoc, I cannot speak for all corporations, but in my time I worked for four of the very largest, and was an executive in the last one I worked for. None of these supported any party. The last one I worked at had top executives from both parties.
Just because an upper level executive is a Republican or a Democrat, seldom do the "corporations" support any party because the executives tend to be from both parties and/or are independent. Further, direct corporate campaign contributions are illegal.
When an executive joins the government, he or she has to financially separate themselves from their former firms in a manner such that their actions cannot result in financial gain. When a member of the government leaves to join industry, he or she cannot be involved in any matter that could affect his former employment with the government.
Still, as we saw with the recent Boeing case where both the CFO and CEO resigned because they hired the very person in the Air Force who made the decision to lease rather than to buy certain aircraft from Boeing at costs greater than buying, corruption can occur. I hope all involved in that fiasco are severely punished.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|