 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
To the extent a Democrat sticks to issues and does not simply recite mindlessly that "I hate Bush" or some such crap, I listen. Among my favorite Democrats are JFK and Governor Moonbeam, Gerry Brown. (He still is one of my favorite politicians.) But when all the candidates are simple haters of one extreme or another, how do you expect a Republican to respond? (I except Kerry and Lieberman from the hate mongering.)
The major fault is not in the Republican reaction to the vitriolic campaign being conducted by the Democrats. It is in the Democrats who think that hate mongering is acceptable politics. |
Coming from you, this is laughable hypocrisy. I've seen your vicious attacks on Hillary Clinton, your constant belittling of Democrats, the disdain with which you held President Clinton...and did you once stand up and call the Congressional Republicans on their hatred of the Clintons? Did you ever blast Bob Barr, Gingrinch, Hyde, etc. for their personal attacks?
You cherish Rush Limbaugh, the man who put a picture of a 13-year-old girl on his desk during his TV show and referred to her as the new White House dog. Yet you have the gall to say Democrats are vitriolic when they criticize Bush over policy?
You're so selective, it's funny. In a sad kind of way. The Democratic candidates haven't gotten personal--their critiques have been on Bush's actions as president, not on his personal life, or his family. No Democrat has stood on the House floor and called Bush a "scumbag," like a Republican did. The Democrats aren't pushing a drive for impeachment, which the Republicans in Congress (Barr leading them) did even before the Lewinsky scandal broke.
Compared to Clinton, Bush is still on a honeymoon with Democrats. He should count his blessings every day that they don't descend into the kind of bashing Republicans did to his predecessor.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
A man of this extreme hatred has not been elected in any Western democracy since Adolf Hitler. |
Actually Dean reminds me of Hitler. He presents an air of seriousness and ascetism, and is clearly very intelligent. No doubt he is a closet anti-semite too and a Saddam supporter. When in office he will put the whole Bush regime on trial for war crimes, and nuke Israel.
It think he will be extremely popular with Europeans.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
What sinks my theory is that he is married to a jewess.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tripledoc
Actually Dean reminds me of Hitler. He presents an air of seriousness and ascetism, and is clearly very intelligent. No doubt he is a closet anti-semite too and a Saddam supporter. When in office he will put the whole Bush regime on trial for war crimes, and nuke Israel.
It think he will be extremely popular with Europeans. |
A closet anti-semite whose wife and children are Jewish? That's one hell of a closet.
edit: okay, you know this, but did you really just use the term "Jewess"? And it's Dean who's reminding you of Hitler? 
Meanwhile, let's all panic about the fact that a presidential candidate appears serious, ascetic, and intelligent. If Clinton and Bush have taught us nothing else, they've taught to either elect presidents who are frivilous, debauched, and intelligent or ones who are frivilous, ascetic, and dumb as a post. Who does this Dean guy think he is? 
You know, if you hurry, you might just be able to catch the next train to Cluesville.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Obviously the friends of Dean have no problem with a polititian who foams at the mouth. |
Beats the hell out of one who drops his trousers, bends over, and idly wonders if his Republican opponent will be using lube this time around.
Meanwhile, it's worth remmbering who the last guy was who got tarred by the Right-Wing Media as being "too angry" to be president: John McCain. Sounds to me like Dean is in excellent company.
Last edited by Rufus T. Firefly on 11-12-2003 at 14:42
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Rufus T. Firefly
|
 |
is one way of saying it, though I prefer "mensch"
Sep 2000 time: 07:32
|
|
There's a reason Dean has gone from joke to dark-horse to long-shot to candidate-to-beat. Dean's anger is working because lots of people are angry, and have been for years -- and they think it's about time someone noticed (feel free to compare this, rightly, to the GOP and the 1994 midterm elections). Kerry, Lieberman, Gephardt, Edwards -- all the more "legitimate," "serious" candidates -- either didn't pick up on this or chose to ignore it. Now a couple of them -- Kerry and Gephardt -- are using it as a campaign posture, but it's obviously just a tactic. Dean's the real deal; if he's frothing at the mouth, well, good for him; every Democrat I know is frothing at the mouth, and its about time our pathetic electoral system gave us someone to vote for.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rufus T. Firefly
... but did you really just use the term "Jewess"?
|
'Jewess' is an inapropriate word? 
Edit: I checked my dictionary and it says it is sometimes used offensively. In this case it was not.
Last edited by Tripledoc on 11-12-2003 at 17:11
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|