 |
|
wervdon
|
|
I can agree with giving them the site 4 of EQ. It may placate them (I doubt it), but more importantly we aren't significantly making our lives harder by them having it when they declare war. In fact, if they do use that as an invasion point, we may actually signicantly help ourselves as they lose rider after rider in those mountains.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
asleepathewheel
|
|
listening too long to one song
Mar 2002 time: 00:32
|
|
so are we not going to have roads west of BoP? I would think that sort of thing would have to be bilateral, from their POV.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
wervdon
|
|
I don't think we should bring up the road issue.
1) Its not that important, the mountains continue further east. A road there might make us slightly more vulnerable, but not a whole lot.
2) It shows them that we are worried about an attack from them. I don't think that would be advantagous.
3) Not having a road there will only *encourage* attacking BoP instead. Sure we'll have a dozen or more units fortified on the choke point, but once they break through they have a good shot at taking out several cities really fast with riders.
4) Roads west of BoP might be useful to us at some point.
5) Trading with them. Harbors might work, but we have to ask them to do so. If they keep a road, its not even an issue.
6) If war does break out we can probally cut the mountain roads pretty fast if its too our advantage. Unless they deliberately leave a stack behind to guard it. the reason I think this is it'll be accessible via galley going through BoP. Its on a mountain, landing 4 pikes, we should be able to survive to cut it off.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Master Zen
|
 |
of naughty
Jan 2003 time: 23:32
|
|
Ok, it is time to reach a decision on the whole chokepoint issue as this war is all but over and CFC has been pestering us for an answer.
First of all, I wan't to poll this issue here, and after that hold a chat with CFC in order to apply "the plan" mentioned above (tell them that the poll is losing to see if they compromise with something else). I do however, want to get all possible poll options very clear so the poll thread doesn't become another discussion.
So far, from reading this thread I have seen the following proposals:
1) Give them Equilibrium (moved to 4)
Bad: Riders can pass although they have mountains and hill to go through.
Good: CFC is satisfied that we give them a fair deal. Quite likely that CFC will be less suspicous of us.
2) Don't give them either chokepoint
Bad: Diplomatically CFC will be extremely resentful at the fact we didn't even give in to their minimum petition. They will feel cornered and threatened and might react violently in the future.
Good: a chokepoint stunts any possible CFC attack.
3) Hold on to both chokepoints until Metallurgy, after which we give them Equilibrium (moved to 4)
Bad: For CFC it is basically a short-term "no" in which they have absolutely no guarantee we intend to keep our word. Might very be no better than not giving them anything.
Good: Gives us time for defense until we have good units. CFC might eventually appreciate that we do keep our word.
Now, my obviously biased point of view:
- Considering how damn BACKWARD CFC is, seriously, does anyone expect them to actually field a sizeable Rider force? I still don't understand the paranoia of some of you guys, it's like Germany being paranoid at Belgium in 1940...
- The paranoia excuse is NO excuse to CFC. Again, if Germany told Belgium that it was paranoid of them, the Belgians would laugh.
- While there is never a guarantee that CFC will be at peace or at war with us, giving them Eq will at least make the odds of them attacking us MUCH diminished and will work wonders to have a solid relationship until the time we actually DO decide to kill 'em off.
- Finally, we are currently in REXing-Like-Bunnies-on-Viagra™ phase. We NEED peace so as not to interrupt this whole expansion plan. If that peace can be achieved at the cost of ONE puny corrupt city, why on earth no?
Think about this please, think with reason and not with swollen pride.
So, any other options before we poll?
-MZ
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
They will attack whether we give them one, two or none of the chokepoints.
The chokepoints do not affect the balance of power on this continent, they only affect how war will be waged when it eventually breaks out.
If you were CFC, what would you do? Let's assume you still think you can win. I b!tch and whine until I got the chokepoints peacefully, all the while planning an "all or nothing" offensive against APO. I bet most of you would do the same.
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
Sorry for my post above, I just realized it does not include "another option" (you've covered them all pretty well, Master Zen).
How about we offer them a cash settlement (ha!) for control of the two chokepoints. It's easier to bargain down Gold than a city...
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Master Zen
|
 |
of naughty
Jan 2003 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Dominae
They will attack whether we give them one, two or none of the chokepoints.
|
I'd rather not affirm things until they actually happen. We've all been wrong from time to time 
quote:
If you were CFC, what would you do? Let's assume you still think you can win. I b!tch and whine until I got the chokepoints peacefully, all the while planning an "all or nothing" offensive against APO. I bet most of you would do the same.
Dominae |
If I were CFC i would have much more than 7 cities, would not have rushed and pissed GCA in a war I know I couldn't win, and sure as hell would not have Goonie as an ambassor to the most important team which he happens to hate. What makes you think, given CFC's erratic past, that they will take the most logical route?
To be honest, if I were CFC, i'd BUILD and actually take advantage of that nice piece of land they call home, then I'd seek outside assistance from one of the other countries before I committed suicide.
But that's just illogical me.
-MZ
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dominae
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Master Zen
To be honest, if I were CFC, i'd BUILD and actually take advantage of that nice piece of land they call home, then I'd seek outside assistance from one of the other countries before I committed suicide.
|
If that was your plan, would you risk going to war with APO over the chokepoints before your "build" phase was over (or even begun)?
And, correct me if I'm wrong, but you would commit suicide against APO eventually, chokepoints or no, right?
Dominae
|
|
|  |
 |
|
BRC
|
|
I go with Zargon. Give them Equillibrium. The mountains are there for us. We get to keep BOP. As long as we don't do anything stupid, we still dictate what happens on this continent. However, we need them to be just as committed to the defense of the continent as we are. Worse than CFC attacking us is CGN or GWT bringing the battle to our homeland.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Hot_Enamel
|
 |
Melbourne, Australia
Aug 2002 time: 14:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Master Zen
Now, my obviously biased point of view:
- Considering how damn BACKWARD CFC is, seriously, does anyone expect them to actually field a sizeable Rider force? I still don't understand the paranoia of some of you guys, it's like Germany being paranoid at Belgium in 1940...
- The paranoia excuse is NO excuse to CFC. Again, if Germany told Belgium that it was paranoid of them, the Belgians would laugh.
Think about this please, think with reason and not with swollen pride.
So, any other options before we poll?
-MZ |
It's all irrelevent if they could win or not....I doubt they could run over us....but this will not stop them trying.
And we shouldnt be making it easier for them.
This was all about compromise.
The "anti-CFC" faction here in poly have compromised that we could give them Eq4 after metalurgy.
We ask that CFC compromise and wait before they get a super corrupt city that does nothing for them.
MZ - you need to also compromise.
According to the FAM, we will look greedy and aggresive if we refuse to give them either.
According to the FAM, we will look paranoid and less trusting if we make them wait.
Thats cr@p.
They must be sh!t scared that we will roll over them after GCA.
So why cant we just say that we are the same, and are also scared of their riders. It's being fair and honest and they still get a choke point after their riders become less of a threat.
I'd also like to see the "When shall we attack CFC poll again". The previous one had a lot of unknowns...(we did not know how much army we would have left after GCA.)
Now, our army is remains largely intact. We could keep going and kill CFC off straight away. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
wervdon
|
|
To me the argument that CFC will attack us either way is the best reason to give them EQ.
Think about it: If they build a sizable enough rider force to truelly be a threat at all, they could probally overwhelm BoP anyways (part of our forces would be in EQ if not, then they'd just take it and this is a moot point to start with). At that point, they have nice flat land and riders to attack our new core.
If we give them EQ they might just be stupid enough to use that as a staging area for an attack. That is much better for us than trying to hold them off of BoP.
Course if they attack us and are smart....then giving them EQ will have no effect either way, they'll just overwhelm BoP to start with (and fail because they can't outproduce us).
So in the end, militarily giving them EQ will only have two net outcomes on a war with them:
1) No change at all.
2) They are baited into attacking us further from our new core and on bad terrain for riders.
Diplomatically there is no question that giving them something now is better than something later is better than nothing at all.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|