 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Social Security is basically there for people who lack the foresight to plan for their retirement. The govt is not the only entity capable of handling your retirement funds reliably, in fact it's probably the least reliable option. Some here seem to forget how many promises the govt has made and broken over the years.
If SS had never been implimented, the elderly who were too stupid to put money aside for their retirement would deserve what they get. Unfortunately we are now stuck with a system that has encouraged years of govt dependency. Now it's a part of our culture to expect the govt to take care of you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
from where i'm sitting, the government doesn't know how to handle money at all.
1. in education, it insists on promoting the mediocre above the deserving, meaning we get half-assed initiatives every four years or so, which promise revolutionary new abilities, only to forget them with the next administration, after having spent fortunes on it.
2. unlike a good corporation, which tries to keep as much of a balanced budget as possible, the government always seems to seek lower revenues while increasing spending. furthermore, they are deferring payments until they're out of office. who will be holding the bag when the lenders come a-knockin'? my generation. so we'll be ****ed while our elders had a wild time.
3. politicians do not have the moral courage, integrity, or long-view, meaning that they're focused on the here and now, conveniently ignoring whatever problems may sprout up from their idiotic initiatives.
4. some of the reason this country's in the fix it's in is because of the abrogation of personal responsibility. if you're not happy with your life, it must be your parents' fault. if you pig out and get fat, it must be the restaurant's fault. if you smoke and get emphysema, it must be altria's fault. if you can't be arsed enough to get a job, it must be the fact that you have the wrong skin color.
social security merely continues the government coddling individuals, emasculating and castrating them.
that said, yes, there are some things outside of the control of individuals: if you have a job, you ought to be able to make ends meet: minimum wage isn't enough, one needs a living wage. altria should have been fined enormous amounts for deliberately lying to the public. but the point remains: by and large, you can control how things end up. therefore, if you don't plan on retirement, and you don't have kids, you'd better figure out a way to live out your golden years pronto--that excludes stealing from those younger than you.
5. i view this like i view affirmative action. i'm against affirmative action because my minority doesn't get it at all. i'm against social security because my generation won't get it at all. how egalitarian.
you get me affirmative action for asian americans, i'll shut up about it. you guarantee social security for my generation, and i'll shut up about it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
chegitz guevara
|
 |
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Q Cubed
from where i'm sitting, the government doesn't know how to handle money at all.
1. in education, it insists on promoting the mediocre above the deserving, meaning we get half-assed initiatives every four years or so, which promise revolutionary new abilities, only to forget them with the next administration, after having spent fortunes on it. |
Welcome to the real world of compromises.
quote: 2. unlike a good corporation, which tries to keep as much of a balanced budget as possible, the government always seems to seek lower revenues while increasing spending |
How many real corporations have you worked for? I've worked for tow ot the largest nd most powerful, and let me tell you this, they are no where near as efficient as right-wing citizues of the government would like to pretend.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara How many real corporations have you worked for? I've worked for tow ot the largest nd most powerful, and let me tell you this, they are no where near as efficient as right-wing citizues of the government would like to pretend. |
True, corporations are also inefficient, but until competition is replaced with cooperation, the profit motive will always trump the service motive.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
I'd also like to add that I have worked both in the corporate world and in the government, and in my experience the government is far more wasteful.
Yes, competition is wasteful, but at least it creates motivation for efficiency. The government doesn't have to worry about the consequences of inefficiency nearly as much as a corporation does because it's source of revenue is fixed, and is not tied to it's performance. In the corporate world it's survival of the fittest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Q Cubed
|
 |
t3h y3ll0w p3ril
Apr 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Q3,
With universities, you are also paying for future generations, and, you keep paying for much of your life. Alumni are a constant target for donation compaigns. |
again, a false analogy. donations are voluntary. taxes are not.
i can say no to a university, and they'll have to live with it. a lot of uchicago grads do that because they disagree with some policies, which is why we have one of the smaller endowments for a university our caliber. if i say no, they can't audit me; they can't take me to court; they can't garnish my wages. they can say very mean things, but whoop-de-doo, i still have my money.
taxes? i either pay or get punished.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|