 |
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Ok now for some serious sh*t.
The general inspector of the Bundeswehr, the German armed forces,Wolfgang Schneiderhahn has disclosed his new and revolutionary plan.
Instead of dividing the armed forces into army, navy and airforce, the new model will work with an expeditionary force of 35.000 men, a stabilization force of 70.000 men and a support force of 145.000 men.
18.000 men from the expeditionary force will be under the new EU expeditionary force.
The new structure will work under the assumption that German armed forces should be able to accomplish five different missions at the same time.
There will be an overall cut in equipment and men, however the draft will be retained, and new equipment like the Airbus A 400-M troop carrier and the Eurofighter will be introduced.
Last edited by Tripledoc on 20-12-2003 at 23:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Yes that's what I thought too. Strange.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
No the idea is to largely make the distinction between the three branches obsolete, and instead form three new cores around which to build the new Army.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
oedo
|
 |
and the revolution
Feb 2000 time: 05:32
|
|
bringing some (more) facts into this discussion.
1. Art. 26 Grundgesetz (the German constitution) doesn´t allow any kind of agressive war.
now it´s up to anyone´s definition what an aggressive war actually is. is there any difference between an aggressive war and an offensive war?
meanwhile pure country defense is hardly an issue anymore, since Germany is surrounded by friends only. but...
2. German minister of defense, Peter Struck quoted about one year ago: "Die Sicherheit Deutschlands wird auch am Hindukusch verteidigt" (The security of Germany also has to be defended at the Hindukush).
although I respect Peter Struck as a competent minister, I find this quote very dubious, since it can justify any kind of war about everywhere in the world, but just calling it a defense war.
there was no mentionable opposistion to his quote here in Germany, though. the PDS (the communists) would be the only party opposing this new orientation, but they virtually have no voice in our parlament anymore.
3. because of this, there´s currently running a reforming process in Germany. part of it is the numbers Tripledoc stated here. from my knowledge, they´re correct. but I´d like to see a link about that.
also there´s a tendency against conscription. there´s still an conscription army in Germany, but the number of drafted men is declining.
Strucks idea is replacing quantity by quality. in favor of peacekeeping troops and crisis reaction forces country defense doesn´t play a major role anymore. this is amazing, since our constitution does allow an army solely for country defense. (Art 87a Grundgesetz)
but as I already mentioned there´s no opposition to this, neither inside Germany nor outside.
we will see how the current and future goverments will be able to fit this new orientation into our constitution.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:32
|
|
They are finally getting close to the numbers imposed by the Versialles (sp) treaty.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
oedo, does Germany have the equivalent of our West Point, etc.? |
There is the Universität der Bundeswehr München and the Universität der Bundeswehr Hamburg.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Didn't Germany introduce conscription for women too?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|