 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
One lie that the right has sought to purport is that we are not in the middle of an oil war.
The facts:
Oilproduction in the U.S has fallen 30 percent since 1970. The oil production in the UK Northsea oilfields is going to fall severely in the coming years.Until 2030 the demand for oil will be 30 percent higher than it is today.
While the Iraqi adventure has recieved a lot of media attention, Bush and Blair have quietly moved in to take control of the West-African oilfields.
However the one surefire proof that the oil business is nervous is that Shell and BP is currently investing heavily in sustainable energy solutions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
I'd like to agree with you, but you're speaking as a raving lunatic, you're not giving sources (you can never have enough of 'em), and you're using shaky logic in your last claim (about Shell and BP). Who knows if they're not just good 'ol fellows trying to find envirofriendly sources? Eh. They probably are nervous, but it's not enough to base your argument on. I'll bet a few of the horse buggy investors started investing in automobiles too, does that make them nervous or just good investors?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
No the thing is. If oil is safe, then why would oil companies invest in sustainable energy?
When people claimed that this war was about oil, the rightwing liars went out and claimed "no, the oil is safe, we've got plenty oil here."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Patroklos
|
 |
Back home in good ole Norfolk VA
Dec 2001 time: 05:32
|
|
Lie eh?
THERE IS OIL IN IRAQ!!!! Is there anyone here who didn't know this, anyone? Of course it is an oil war, just like it is a humaitarioan war, a war of liberation, a war agains terror, and a war against dictators. Bush, Powell, Rumsfeld stated almost from the begining that oil was imoportant. It simply wssn't the issue they leaned on most. One of their first policy agreemenst on the coming war was how to deal with the oil. And considering that oil is what will eventually pay for Iraqi reconstruction, I think it was very much on their minds, especially if it will increase world oil supply and reduce prices WORLDWIDE!!!!
But since Iraq is of course ONLY about one issue, name me another war that had only one motive at its heart.
-Pat
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Ok. Now you say that the war is about oil. Why did they not say that before the war. No it was consistently refused that the War was about oil. And to support that they said "we've got plenty of oil."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: No the thing is. If oil is safe, then why would oil companies invest in sustainable energy? |
Curiosity. Perhaps they're seeing if a highly-refined wind or solar or hydrogen etc solution would be more profitable than oil? Never thought about that did you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by JohnT
Cite on the North Sea quote? |
UK Department of Trade and Industry.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Lefty Scaevola
If the USA wanted to invade a country for oil, it would have inveaded Venuzuala, not Iraq. |
Actually a coup was attempted in 2002 to prevent Hugo Chavez from nationalising the Venezuelan oil, or impose price controls.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
yeah, and it was done by business in Venuzula and the Bush Administration denounced the coup. |
Not exactly. The New York Times approved it. And the coup was actually traced to Colin Powell. Chavez was abducted by CIA agents, but released when the coup failed when the military choose to back Chavez instead of the neo-liberal coup.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Tripledoc
|
|
Come on. This is common knowledge. Accusing me of wearing a tinfoil hat, is that all you can come up with?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|