 |
|
niDe
|
|
*packs a cone*
it is fun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Peter Triggs
|
|
Gone Fishin, Canada
Jan 2000 time: 05:32
|
|
quote:
if you are saying people should no be covered by a national health plan because their detrimental behavior is costing YOU money... don't you think you should SHOW THAT IT IS COSTING YOU MONEY?!
what about people who get hurt skateboarding or playing sports? that is an activity where injuries cost more money than marijuana usage?
|
We have a national health plan and I'm paying for the increasing incidence of schizophrenia in the population. Here's a link. I can't immediately remember the name of the bloke who's doing really good research on this stuff but I'll try to track him down. In summary:
quote:
"The overall weight of evidence is that occasional use of cannabis has few harmful effects overall," Zammit's team writes. "Nevertheless, our results indicate a potentially serious risk to the mental health of people who use cannabis. Such risks need to be considered in the current move to liberalise and possibly legalise the use of cannabis in the UK and other countries."
|
http://www.newscientist.com/hottopi...hizophrenia.jsp
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
Yeah I've heard that it can cause alot of mental health problems. But again thats probably linked to the amount of usage.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
Sava you really are a strong advocate for legalising dope aren'y you. Some bloody good arguments you are raising.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
Also looking on the voting results. The vast majority of people that are against legalising it are people who have not had dope before. Interesting, I must say. Makes you wonder what they are basing their opinions on if they have never tried it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Peter Triggs
|
|
Gone Fishin, Canada
Jan 2000 time: 05:32
|
|
What about the pothead? There are people who totally f__k up their lives from smoking pot. I know some. There is a relativelely small minority of people who are genetically disposed toward schizophenia but who will be triggered towards this illness by pot. I know that for most people that smoking dope is less damaging than drinking or smoking tobacco.
But there is this minority who get totally screwed from smoking dope. What do we do about this? Personally, I'm in favour of minimal government but I know people who have really screwed themselve. I really don't know an answer to this question.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
True that, true that. Hmmm still I know some people that are totally against it and have never touched the stuff before, yet they think that alcohol and ciggies are so much more better than dope. Makes you wonder bout their reasoning (or lackthereof).
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
Eh, it's the same as with the people who totally screw themselves up with the likes of alcohol. How do they deal with this btw, can't for the life of me remember.
Maybe we should just shoot them. (jokes)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
H Tuttle - quote: I don't get what your getting at. Could you rephrase? I think you're trying to make a flipside argument...? I'm not trying to punish anyone by outlawing pot. In fact, if its not any worse than cigarettes I'm for it being legalized. I'd just like some decent controls on it since it does screw up your perception of reality, as does alcohol. |
Did you not say it should be illegal? That's called punishing people... And your rationale, some of the people you know were lazy, etc., means you advocate punishing millions of people based on what these few people you know have done.
quote: I was just debating the improvement to society if it was legalized. From my limited experience I've seen a bunch of people get hooked on pot, then turn into bags of crap. |
Has pot disappeared under prohibition? Your argument's only potential viability (if we ignore morality) depends on the proposition that pot use is not only lower under prohibition, but so much lower as to outweigh all the negative consequences of prohibition...
quote: But my position wasn't from any moral aspect. |
I know. 
quote: More of a social benefit to socity standpoint. AKA: potheads do go to heaven and are not satan spawn. |
Freedom is not a social benefit, but a nanny state that rules over us is a social benefit? The Nazis murdered millions based on what they decided was good for society...you know, ridding society of "undesirables" to enhance the German "race" starting with the mentally handicapped...
I suggest you find a different ideological principle...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Ramo
|
 |
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
Why legalize pot? Well, let's go over the reasons:
1. It's my body and I'm not harming a single person, so how is it the state's purview to decide whether or not I can smoke weed?
2. Locking a person up in a US prison will do far more damage to him than some weed ever would.
3. Prohibition is totally ineffective in stopping drug use.
4. Prohibition creates huge black markets in which labor rights, consumer protections, and competition are totally undermined, being replaced by wanton violence.
5. Weed is simply not a very dangerous drug. Since it isn't addictive, as opposed to say nicotine, it tends not to be smoked in a great enough frequency to cause nasty things like lung cancer. Frankly, I think my use of caffiene is far more harmful to my health than my use of weed.
And while we're at it, let's legalize the rest of the drugs. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
1. True
2. Probably true
3. Not totally ineffective but pretty much.
4. Eh thats the workers fault for being in that black industry. Get a legal job.
5. Its about as dangerous as alcohol and ciggies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
hahahahahahahahahahahaha
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:32
|
|
Peter - quote: But there is this minority who get totally screwed from smoking dope. What do we do about this? |
"We"? Government does not exist to prevent you from "screwing up", it exists to secure your freedom from those who would take it. So advocating "we" take your freedom before you screw up defeats the purpose of government... If my friend or family member had a problem with pot, alcohol, tobacco, gambling, or any other thing, I'd offer counsel but the choice still rests with them. Btw, putting millions of people in cages with real criminals for their own good is a perversion of logic...
quote: Personally, I'm in favour of minimal government but I know people who have really screwed themselve. I really don't know an answer to this question. |
You can't be for "minimal" government and take the position that government should decide what we all can or cannot ingest, the two are simply incompatable...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Harry Tuttle

|
 |
of the Hoople Heads
Mar 2003 time: 00:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
H Tuttle -
Did you not say it should be illegal? That's called punishing people... And your rationale, some of the people you know were lazy, etc., means you advocate punishing millions of people based on what these few people you know have done. |
I don't know if I can agree with your rational about illegal = punishment. I mean it could only be punishment if we were trying to make someone atone for what they did wrong. The only punishment with it being illegal is the kind given out when caught. By your definition I would say that we are punishing everyone by not allowing them the opportunity to smoke pot legally.
QUOTE] Originally posted by Berzerker
Has pot disappeared under prohibition? Your argument's only potential viability (if we ignore morality) depends on the proposition that pot use is not only lower under prohibition, but so much lower as to outweigh all the negative consequences of prohibition...[/QUOTE]
I don't understand what you mean. I was referring to the benefit and problems that are inherent with legalizing drug use such as pot. ie. no black market, possible addiction problems, etc...
quote: Originally posted by Berzerker
Freedom is not a social benefit, but a nanny state that rules over us is a social benefit? The Nazis murdered millions based on what they decided was good for society...you know, ridding society of "undesirables" to enhance the German "race" starting with the mentally handicapped...
I suggest you find a different ideological principle... |
Woah! That is a big step don't you think? The Nazis killed based on race. I was debating whether it's a good idea to legalize pot. My position now, after debating the issue, is that if it is no more harmful then the things we already have then legalize it.
And I'm a Republican/Conservative type. Nanny states don't sit well with me. I just want government to intervene on things that might be actually harmful to us because we have a hard problem saying no to them. If addiciton with pot is to much of a con for legalizing it then I say no.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
Berzerker -
Na didn't know the first bit. Interesting bit of news.
Ummmm how many people die from dope use a year?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:32
|
|
Ummm i ain't a prohibitionist, I'm for legalising it. The innocent ones I do feel sorry for. The drug buyers should be aware of the dangers and its their own choice to go over the law to get it.
So the numbers being insignificant, then that argument is safe to run with for someone wanting to legalise it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Sava
|
 |
GO GO GO!
Mar 2001 time: 23:32
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Peter Triggs
What about the pothead? There are people who totally f__k up their lives from smoking pot. I know some. There is a relativelely small minority of people who are genetically disposed toward schizophenia but who will be triggered towards this illness by pot. I know that for most people that smoking dope is less damaging than drinking or smoking tobacco.
But there is this minority who get totally screwed from smoking dope. What do we do about this? Personally, I'm in favour of minimal government but I know people who have really screwed themselve. I really don't know an answer to this question. |
so how is locking them up in jail a solution? just curious... wouldn't it be better for the stuff to be legal and for the tax money generated from the sale of marijuana going to fund rehab and addiction counseling programs? Despite the fact that these programs WORK and that prison makes things worse... rehab programs and addiction counseling COSTS LESS THAN PRISON!!
Not only do we save money by not locking these non-violent offenders up, but we GENERATE money in order to pay for these things. That means skywalker's selfish ass won't have to pay for some pothead's medical bills, too! 
quote: Weed is addictive. You weren't there in the other thread a while ago, but this came up there too. ANY PSYCHOACTIVE DRUG IS CHEMICALLY ADDICTIVE. (psycoactive meaning that it induces or suppresses neurotransmitters) It is an inherent property of their modus operandi - over time the mind "recalibrates" unnatural levels of neurotransmitters to "natural", requiring greater amounts of a drug to achieve a high and requiring small or moderate amounts of a drug to feel normal. | marijuana is NOT CHEMICALLY ADDICTIVE!!! you are reaching Fez levels here skywalker
The American Medical Association opposed the banning of marijuana http://www.pdxnorml.org/AMA_opposes_1937.html
Marijuana is only addictive in the sense that really pleasant things in life are worth repeating.
Even though Marijuana is not chemically addictive, the following substances are: caffeine, alcohol, nicotine, chocolate, prescription drugs...
If you are going to argue the "pot is bad for you" argument, skywalker, don't you think you should find out what the medical community thinks? You know... doctors who know what's bad for you and stuff? They think marijuana is fine (in moderation) and that it has enormous potential in medical use, not just a few diseases here and there.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:32. Apolyton Time is 00:32. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|