 |
|  |
 |
|
SpencerH
|
 |
Co-Ruler of my patch of land south of Birmingham Alabama
Feb 2002 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by GePap
And what exactly makes republican better in national defense? that they put more money into fancy military procurement programs? Too bad they cut benefits to troops and veterans while doing it. That they are more eager to send people into war? IN the last 100 years it has been Dems using the military the most.
Republicans have brilliantlybuilt the notion that they are the party of national defense, even though now, after Dole left, almost none of their party leaders (McCain isn't a party leader) ever had any military experience, which is a difference with the Dems. As I said, the republicans get away with murder, like questioning the patriotism of a man who lost 3 limbs serving this country. |
Whether someone served in the military or not is not really a qualifier for commander in chief. It may help, but its not vital.
Voters dont care about the last hundred years. Its a question of perception, dems are seen as the wishy-washy peacenik crowd (Clinton, Carter) and repubs (Bush, Bush, Reagan, Ford, Nixon) as the hawks.
What does losing limbs in war have to do with patriotism?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by SpencerH
Whether someone served in the military or not is not really a qualifier for commander in chief. It may help, but its not vital. |
I agree..so why do so many conservatives question the ability of non military types to make certain decisions?
quote:
Voters dont care about the last hundred years. Its a question of perception, dems are seen as the wishy-washy peacenik crowd (Clinton, Carter) and repubs (Bush, Bush, Reagan, Ford, Nixon) as the hawks. |
What about Johnson? he was more of a hawk than any of those guys. Add to this the fact that being a hawk does not mean you are better when it comes to international affairs or promoting our security? After all, it was Nixon that got out of Vietnam..why didn;t he stay till victory?
quote:
What does losing limbs in war have to do with patriotism? |
He was also decorated for his actions- i guess, what does dying for your contry have to do with service? And how do you measure patriotism? By what you say, or what you do?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:33
|
|
The wonders of the double post abound!
Last edited by GePap on 08-01-2004 at 02:07
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Che, to win, the Dems need some of the Southern states.... Dean has no hope whatsoever in the South. |
I don't know why people keep saying this. Gore didn't win a single Southern state in 2000 (unless you count New Mexico), and yet if he had been able to hold on to West Virginia or New Hampshire, longtime Dem strongholds, he'd be running for reelection this year.
The Dems don't need the South. If they could steal a state or two, great, but they can win the election without a single state south of the Mason-Dixon Line.
Moreover, regarding Max Cleland, the Democrat gentlemen who had three limbs blown off in Vietnam, the Republicans ran ads against him showing pictures of him with Osama & Saddam in the background. That is simply beyond the boundaries of good taste, even in politics.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|