Apolyton Archive  |  Preserved copy of the Apolyton Civilization Site and its forums as they stood in September 2005. Read-only; nothing here can be posted to or replied to.  |  Forum index |  About this archive |  The 1998–2001 UBB forums
Today on Apolyton WARDELL INTERVIEW PROMO A.C.S. HISTORY CHAPTER 4 GET CIV4 /w FREE PLUS! A.C.S. PHOTO GALLERY GET A.O.M. V1.1
Apolyton Civilization Forums
main| civ2| civ3| civ4| smac| ctp2| ron| moo3| galciv| galciv2| alt| about|
ApolytonPLUS | register | search | faq | new posts | pm (-/-) | upload | members
hall of fame new! | civgroups | civgroups news | interviews | the column | radio | chat | directory | news | store | PLUS
Apolyton Civilization Forums : Powered by vBulletin version 2.0.3 Apolyton Civilization Forums > Miscellaneous > Archive > Off-Topic-Archive > It does not matter if Iraq has or had WOMD's or not at this point
Show a Printable Version | Email This Page to Someone! | Receive updates to this thread | Report this to Apolyton news!

bottom of page
  
Author
Thread   
Pages (4): [ 1   2   3   4   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
sprucemoose3311 is offline sprucemoose3311
Chieftain
san jose, ca
Jun 2002
time: 21:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 04:33 Visit sprucemoose3311's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#61 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

I live in san jose, with a 7 percent unemployment rate and I would say the lower class, working class, and higher are doing beter. Those on unemployment benefits are still buying their SUVs also...

Elok is offline Elok
Prince
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003
time: 00:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 04:54
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#62 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

I'll repeat what I've always said: it never mattered. How was Saddam supposed to use them against us if he had them?

On a related note, is there any historical precedent for America, or any country, liberating a nation with no common, unified identity from a dictator, then successfully turning it into a democracy overnight? In fact, can anyone think of an example where instant democracy worked in ANY country? All that comes to mind for me is the puppet we propped up in Germany after WWI, and those little post-soviet nuggets in eastern Europe...which is why I'm inclined to question this administration's sanity. Do any of the history buffs on Poly have good news for me?

Kuciwalker is offline Kuciwalker
Emperor
of Schmooism
Feb 2001
time: 00:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 05:01
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#63 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

The thing people seem to be forgetting in this is that in the debate over who will win the election, it doesn't matter whether or not the choice makes sense from the perspective of choosing a good president (I'm not even going to get into a debate on who has the better policy) - all that matters is what people THINK. And one thing everyone here should have figured out by now is that most people aren't rational...

quote:
In fact, can anyone think of an example where instant democracy worked in ANY country? All that comes to mind for me is the puppet we propped up in Germany after WWI, and those little post-soviet nuggets in eastern Europe...


Japan and Germany after WWII, maybe?

MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 05:53 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#64 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton or Terrorists Win

quote:
Originally posted by sprucemoose3311
Those on unemployment benefits are still buying their SUVs also...


Credit abuse allows people to buy things that they cannot really afford so they slide further into debt because of their stupid consumption habits that are based on gratification.


So no -- buying such things as SUVS, fur coats, jewelry, and so on is not a sign of healthy economy -- it's a sign of stupid consumption habits based on gratification -- not caring if you can afford what you're buying on credit.

Zylka is offline Zylka
Prince
sure
May 2000
time: 05:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 06:13
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#65 Report this post to a moderator
what apt examples Put an end to popups!

Fur coats and Jewlery AAAAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAA

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 06:37 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#66 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by skywalker
quote:
In fact, can anyone think of an example where instant democracy worked in ANY country? All that comes to mind for me is the puppet we propped up in Germany after WWI, and those little post-soviet nuggets in eastern Europe...


Japan and Germany after WWII, maybe?


Germany had as long an experience with parlimentary democracy as France. The Kaisar's powers were subject to limitation by the Parliament.

Japan, IIRC, was a constitutional monarchy before the generals took control in the (1920s?).

Traianvs is offline Traianvs
Prince
Belgium, land of plenty (corruption)
Jan 2000
time: 06:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 06:55
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#67 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

quote:
Originally posted by Sava
I'm in #4... I don't particularly like Dem's, but they are less evil. The two party system is complete crap. We need a radical change in the way we view politics in this country, or else it will be business as usual.


You are absolutely right, I still can't believe you think you're having a democracy there.
You only have 2 noteworthy parties (that are both rightwing in my eyes, although the democrats are still way better of coz); Your president has pretty much all the power, and the winner is chosen not because of his qualities but thanks to the media and the obligatory hugely expensive campaigns. I mean don't tell me Bush had done any noteworthy political deed in his entire life before he became president. Heh actually he was a total failure till he converted to strict christianity again.
PS: the opposition in the US is of no importance either, which is rather strange as here with us they still have a lot of influence

A government with a coalition is a whole lot safer in my eyes!

GePap is offline GePap
King
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001
time: 23:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 20:23
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#68 Report this post to a moderator
Suffering from ads?

quote:
Originally posted by Elok

On a related note, is there any historical precedent for America, or any country, liberating a nation with no common, unified identity from a dictator, then successfully turning it into a democracy overnight? In fact, can anyone think of an example where instant democracy worked in ANY country? All that comes to mind for me is the puppet we propped up in Germany after WWI, and those little post-soviet nuggets in eastern Europe...which is why I'm inclined to question this administration's sanity. Do any of the history buffs on Poly have good news for me?


No. Sorry. My fear is that the Bush amdin. is the wrong admin. to try such an experiment. And I whish this would become Dean's Iraq line: how can an admin. who fails to understand democracy at home build it anywhere else?

Elok is offline Elok
Prince
Land of Ramen Dragons
Mar 2003
time: 00:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 20:44
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#69 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Yeah, I talked to my dad last night, and he mentioned WWII recovery too. I suppose that is in some ways a valid exception, but I guess my point is/was/should be that a society has to grow to a certain extent before it is ready to become a democracy. Iraq is a cluster of alienated peoples who hate and distrust each other with a passion. So is America, of course, but we're more civil about it. We had a democratic tradition stretching back before we were even independent. I don't know that they even want one over there. I also don't know that they know what they DO want, as a matter of fact. Been a long time since anyone's asked them, after all.

Stuie is offline Stuie

King
Have a beer!
Sep 2001
time: 00:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 21:08 Visit Stuie<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#70 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by rah


More like
Someone tell the anecdote again about how many educated Americans will vote for Bush again because they are much better off economically than they were 4 years ago and are now being taxed less on top of it.

Thanks GB.
Better investment income.
Better work income.
More job security.
Less taxes.


What country are you living in?

Since GW came to office:

Investment income has been down, or flat at best. The total stock market is still down about 2.5% since he came to office, even though the gains last year were impressive. Dividends have been lower than in the 90s.

Work income has been flat - most companies have stopped giving any sort of raises, claiming poverty. Personally, I was getting raises near 10% of my salary before Bush came to power. Now I'm lucky if my raise matches the cost-of-living.

Job security? The unemployment rate was close to 4% when Clinton left office. It is currently at 5.9% (as of Nov 2003). Sounds higher to me. From personal experience, I know several people who have lost jobs in the last three years and either continue to be unemployed or have been forced to take lower paying jobs. These are skilled people, too, that should command decent wages.

As for less taxes, yes, on a Federal level. Meanwhile state and local taxes are being increased to compensate for less Federal funding of local programs. Great - give with one hand and take with the other.

Wow, thanks GW.

MrFun is offline MrFun
King
of Iowa
Nov 2000
time: 23:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 22:05 Visit MrFun's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#71 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, pre-order Civilization IV

quote:
Originally posted by chegitz guevara


Germany had as long an experience with parlimentary democracy as France. The Kaisar's powers were subject to limitation by the Parliament.

Japan, IIRC, was a constitutional monarchy before the generals took control in the (1920s?).


Long parliamentary democracy in Germany?


Other historians would beg to differ, by arguing that the Junker class and and the monarchs of Prussia, all the way up to the mid 19th century, established a long tradition of authoritarian rule.

Not until the liberalization of government rule in the late 19th century, did any real kind of parlimentary democracy emerge. So I think the words, "long tradition" are problematic to say the least.

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:33
  Old Post 08-01-2004 23:22 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#72 Report this post to a moderator
Lose 30 kilos (of popups)

And it wasn't until the late-19th century that parliamentary democracy was firmly established in France (Louis Napoleon for instance had abolished the legislative assembly altogether).

rah is offline rah
Apolyton Prince of Moderators, Master of Reason
Lord of the Ferrets
Jan 1970
time: 23:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 00:00
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#73 Report this post to a moderator
Get a bigger avatar today!

quote:
Originally posted by Stuie


What country are you living in?



THE US of A

I was speaking of personal experience. I think I know more about my personal experiences than you do.

If you had read the whole thread you might have seen that I was discussing personal experience, but I know you don't let those kind of details get in your way when you have a particular horse to beat.

Pekka is offline Pekka
Chieftain
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002
time: 07:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 00:17
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#74 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition

Yes it matters. Because, if they have them, well.. there are unaccounted WMDs not in our radar. WHat's going to happen to them? What if some rogue element rises its head in Iraq some years from now? What if someone decides to sell the WMD to terrorists? It matters very much if there is WMD and if we are to find them.

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 00:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#75 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy GURPS/ Alpha Centauri

quote:
Originally posted by Elok
I'll repeat what I've always said: it never mattered. How was Saddam supposed to use them against us if he had them?

On a related note, is there any historical precedent for America, or any country, liberating a nation with no common, unified identity from a dictator, then successfully turning it into a democracy overnight? In fact, can anyone think of an example where instant democracy worked in ANY country? All that comes to mind for me is the puppet we propped up in Germany after WWI, and those little post-soviet nuggets in eastern Europe...which is why I'm inclined to question this administration's sanity. Do any of the history buffs on Poly have good news for me?


This is the kind of thinking that caused me to think that leaving Saddam in power was the right thing to do in 1991.

My views changed on this after 9/11.

Stuie is offline Stuie

King
Have a beer!
Sep 2001
time: 00:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 01:03 Visit Stuie<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#76 Report this post to a moderator
Got spare money?

quote:
Originally posted by rah


THE US of A

I was speaking of personal experience.....


That's funny. Most of my response was personal experience as well.

Oh, well. Glad you found the silver lining.

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 01:25 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#77 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Call to Power 2

quote:
Originally posted by Ned


This is the kind of thinking that caused me to think that leaving Saddam in power was the right thing to do in 1991.

My views changed on this after 9/11.


Why? What did Hussein have to do with 9/11? That's right, absolutley nothing. No terrorist attack launched against Americans has evern been aided, abetted, or sponsored by Iraq, nuless you wnat to include th phoney attempt against Bush's life that the Kuwaitis invented.

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 01:27 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#78 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization III: Complete

Don't mind Ned. In his fantasy world, Saddam had been in bed with al-Qaeda.

rah is offline rah
Apolyton Prince of Moderators, Master of Reason
Lord of the Ferrets
Jan 1970
time: 23:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 01:42
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#79 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by Stuie


That's funny. Most of my response was personal experience as well.

Oh, well. Glad you found the silver lining.


You still can't comprehend. I didn't find the silver lining, I found those items I listed for myself. God, are you dense. Are you saying that your PERSONAL experiences have exactly matched the country averages, since that's the arguement you used.

People are going to vote based on their personal experiences/perceptions of how they've done over the last 4 years, NOT the country averages.

Jeeze.

SlowwHand is offline SlowwHand
King
of The Cooler
Sep 1999
time: 23:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 01:49 Visit SlowwHand's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#80 Report this post to a moderator
Increase the size of your Attachments

WOMD never mattered at any point.
Kicking Hussein's ass was well warranted, and Bush screwed the pooch by even bothering to utter the words, WOMD.

Agathon is offline Agathon
Prince
Leafs 4TW!! - CPA
Dec 2002
time: 00:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 01:51
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#81 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization: The Boardgame

If people remembered how much support McCain was getting last time as an insurgent candidate, they might want to think again about Dean's prospects.

Stuie is offline Stuie

King
Have a beer!
Sep 2001
time: 00:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:01 Visit Stuie<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#82 Report this post to a moderator
Inflate your Upload Space

quote:
Originally posted by rah


You still can't comprehend. I didn't find the silver lining, I found those items I listed for myself. God, are you dense.


Gee, thanks Rah. First time I've been tossed a personal insult by a moderator.

Now let's see what I posted....

quote:
Investment income has been down, or flat at best. The total stock market is still down about 2.5% since he came to office, even though the gains last year were impressive. Dividends have been lower than in the 90s.


Ok, nothing "personal" there, but my investment portfolio has not increased all that much in the past four years other than additional input on my part.

quote:
Work income has been flat - most companies have stopped giving any sort of raises, claiming poverty. Personally, I was getting raises near 10% of my salary before Bush came to power. Now I'm lucky if my raise matches the cost-of-living.


Oh, personal experience.

quote:
Job security? The unemployment rate was close to 4% when Clinton left office. It is currently at 5.9% (as of Nov 2003). Sounds higher to me. From personal experience, I know several people who have lost jobs in the last three years and either continue to be unemployed or have been forced to take lower paying jobs. These are skilled people, too, that should command decent wages.




quote:
As for less taxes, yes, on a Federal level. Meanwhile state and local taxes are being increased to compensate for less Federal funding of local programs. Great - give with one hand and take with the other.


Once again, I didn't say it was personal experience, but it is. My local and state taxes have both increased. Am I paying less overall? Yes, but that's because I keep having children at an alarming rate, so I'm adding more deductions.

Have a nice day.

Stuie is offline Stuie

King
Have a beer!
Sep 2001
time: 00:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:03 Visit Stuie<br><a href=/members><img src=/forums/images/inmate-icon.gif border=0></a><BR>'s homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#83 Report this post to a moderator
Put an end to popups!

quote:
Originally posted by SlowwHand
WOMD never mattered at any point.
Kicking Hussein's ass was well warranted, and Bush screwed the pooch by even bothering to utter the words, WOMD.


Cool. If it's not about WOMD, when do we take out Mugabe?

Ned is offline Ned
Prince
of Aptos, CA
Oct 1999
time: 21:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:06
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#84 Report this post to a moderator
Browse Apolyton AD-FREE

Well, Che and Ramo, that is what you say now. But consider this:

Gulf I was about Kuwait, not WMD. He had used them against the Iranians and Kurds, but not against us during the war. One could reasonably conclude that he would not use them against us based on this. Besides, Saddam's WMD at that time was thought only to be capable of battlefied use.

When al Qa'ida attacked us on 9/11, it became clear that terrorists were willing and capable of conducting truly massive attacks on the US. (In retrospect, we should have been more concerned about the '93 attack on the WTC.) But the threat that Saddam forshadowed was the following anthrax attack. In '98, when the inspectors left, Saddam had not accounted for tons of anthrax materials, IIRC.

Now, you would argue that even if Saddam had anthrax, that the war against Iraq was not justified because there was no connection between Al Qaeda and Saddam. However, even if Osama bin Laden and Saddam Hussein were natural enemies, it does not mean that they could not unite against a common enemy, the United States, just as United States allied with communist Russia to defeat Nazi Germany. Moreover, Saddam was known to support terrorism abroad and was known to permit terrorist training camps inside Iraq. It does not require a complete absence of intelligence to believe that Saddam could be covertly supporting Osama bin Laden. In fact, with no evidence to the contrary, only a blithering idiot would deny the likelihood of such a covert connection.

So we combine a source of anthrax with a terrorist organization that has shown a willingness and ability to deliver massive attacks on United States, and the calculus on removing Saddam Hussein changes.

chegitz guevara is offline chegitz guevara
King
Ft. Lauderdale, FL Communist Party of Apolyton
Jun 2000
time: 00:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:10 Visit chegitz guevara's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#85 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

So you are saying we should invade France because theoretically they could nuke us? You can't invade other countries on maybes (well, I guess we just did). Should I be able to kill you because you could, conceivably kill me? How would the law treat me?

Ogie Oglethorpe is offline Ogie Oglethorpe
King
Marietta, GA
Dec 1999
time: 05:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:20
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#86 Report this post to a moderator
Enter the AD-FREE zone

Well we're talking France right?


Hmmm.... tough call.
j/k

Ramo is offline Ramo
King
Austin, Texas, USA
Oct 1999
time: 23:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:23 Visit Ramo's homepage!
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#87 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Galactic Civilizations

quote:
In fact, with no evidence to the contrary, only a blithering idiot would deny the likelihood of such a covert connection.


Except there is evidence to the contrary:
1. Saddam has never participated in a terrorist attack against the US, and there was no good reason for him to do so before a war started.
2. Saddam's main target for the past decade has been Islamists.

Thus, only a "blithering idiot" would assert the likelyhood of a Saddam-al-Qaeda connection, given that there is no evidence such a connection existed (hell, even the gov't has publicly denied that a connection exists).

Last edited by Ramo on 09-01-2004 at 05:44

Pekka is offline Pekka
Chieftain
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002
time: 07:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:25
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#88 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton, buy Civilization 2

There is one problem though. Now, if we don't find the WMD and go like we don't care about it either, it creates a situation when if the US runs into new problems and conflicts and tries to justify it's possible pre emptive strike, the international scene is likely to be holding on to this WMD thing, and that the word can not be trusted as far as 'we have evidence, 100%' goes.

International help wasn't huge last time, but I think it would be wise to not burn bridges and shut doors in the way.. so we should think about what to do with that argument. I'm not saying US is not to be trusted, all I'm saying is there might be countries using this argument and watering down US plans to get help.

What should be done?

rah is offline rah
Apolyton Prince of Moderators, Master of Reason
Lord of the Ferrets
Jan 1970
time: 23:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:26
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#89 Report this post to a moderator
Full PM-box? Change here!

Hey stuie, you started it by asking

"What country are you living in?"

I answered. You implied that it's impossible to have had success in THIS COUNTRY since Bush took office. I HAVE and many other people have too. I can't help if it if you haven't. So I assume you won't vote for him. I will be. Thanks for making my point that people will vote how the PERSONALLY have percieved the improvement or FAILURES during the last four years.

Pekka is offline Pekka
Chieftain
em seu burro dos pais!
Feb 2002
time: 07:33
  Old Post 09-01-2004 02:27
Edit/Delete Message Reply w/Quote
#90 Report this post to a moderator
Support Apolyton buy from Amazon

Ned, just a sidenote, everyone has Anthrax, everyone.

 
Pages (4): [ 1   2   3   4   ]
< Last Thread     Next Thread > Post New Thread     Post A Reply
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33.
Apolyton Time is 00:33.
    top of page
Rate This Thread:
archivepost
Forum Jump:
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
 




Contact Us - Apolyton Civilization Site - Support Us!

Building a better Apolyton through better information. Click here and take our poll!
Non-US visitors, click here!

Powered by: vBulletin Version 2.0.3
Copyright ©2000, 2001, Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Page generated in 0.0657 seconds (93.14% PHP - 6.86% MySQL) with 31 queries
Page Loading Time:

Support Apolyton: Amazon USA | Amazon UK | Amazon DE | Amazon FR |
Support Apolyton and get FREE PLUS, Buy from Chips&Bits: Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations: Deluxe Edition | Call to Power 2 | Civilization: The Boardgame | GURPS/ Alpha Centauri | Alpha Centauri | Civilization IV | Civilization III: Complete |


Front Page | Civilization IV | Civilization III | Civilization II | Call to Power II | Alpha Centauri | Master of Orion III
Rise of Nations | Galactic Civilizations | Galactic Civilizations II | Misc
Alt.Civs | Civ I | C:CtP I | About | News | Directory | Apolyton Store | Forums | Chat | Columns | Interviews | Newsletter
Scenario League | CSC | Clash of Civs | Spanish Site | CtP Maps | Cradle of Civ | WesW's Ctp1/2 Site | Civ3 Haven

apolyton.net | apolyton.com | civilization2.net | civilization3.net | civilization4.net | civilizationiv.info | calltopower.net | galciv.net | galciv2.net | moo3.net