 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
How do average murder rates = average crime rates?
|
Since the death penalty is only enacted for the crime of murder, what's the point of comparing crime rates instead of murder rates? Surely you don't think a state having the death penalty prevents someone from stealing a woman's purse, do you?
At any rate, look at the states without death penalties...do you really think they'll have a higher crime rate than the ones with it? Of course, you could just cite sources for your claim.
quote: Secondly there are certain states listed as 'death penalty states' like New Jersey who haven't executed ANYONE (they are still waiting on their first execution since the 1800s, IIRC). |
New Jersey last executed someone in 1963. Regardless, it does have the death penalty on the books. You didn't make any stipulation for states who hadn't used it in a while.
Besides, NJ murder rate is 3.5 per 100,000, which is still considerably lower than the most of the active DP states.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Agathon said the countries without the death penalty have lower overall CRIME. He was asserting that getting rid of the death penalty would lower crime. |
No, that's not what he said:
"Countries that don't have the death penalty have much lower rates of this sort of crime."
"That sort of crime" clearly equating to crimes that are punishable by the death penalty.
quote: In addition Illinois has a moratorium on the DP, so it should be moved to the other list. |
Um, the list stops at 1999, and Illinois didn't enact its moratorium until 2002, IIRC.
quote: You have states without the death penalty on the list who's murder rate is higher than their neighbors (Vermont & New Hampshire; Michigan & Ohio; Minnesota & Montana, etc) |
And you have ones without the DP with lower murder rates than their neighbors: North Dakota vs. S. Dakota and Montana; Massachusetts vs. NY, CT; Wisconsin and Minnesota vs. IL, MO, etc. You're being remarkably selective in how you're looking at the rates.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Imran Siddiqui

|
 |
The Potterverse
Jan 1970 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: And you have ones without the DP with lower murder rates than their neighbors: North Dakota vs. S. Dakota and Montana; Massachusetts vs. NY, CT; Wisconsin and Minnesota vs. IL, MO, etc. You're being remarkably selective in how you're looking at the rates. |
So are you. Such as states like New Jersey, New York, Kentucky, etc., who haven't killed anyone in the last 30 or so years considered DP states because they have the law on the books, which is never used.
States like Iowa, Massachusettes, Maine are going to have low murder rates no matter if they have the DP or not.
The whole deal with saying Michigan has higher DP rates than Ohio, etc., is debunking Agathon's claim that places that don't have the death penalty are safer than those do.
Last edited by Imran Siddiqui on 07-02-2004 at 09:28
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
And ***-for-tat:
http://www.deathpenaltyinfo.org/art...TATES%20WITHOUT
quote:
CRIMINOLOGISTS' VIEWS ON DETERRENCE AND THE DEATH PENALTY
A survey of experts from the American Society of Criminology, the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, and the Law and Society Association showed that the overwhelming majority did not believe that the death penalty is a proven deterrent to homicide. Over 80% believe the existing research fails to support a deterrence justification for the death penalty. Similarly, over 75% of those polled do not believe that increasing the number of executions, or decreasing the time spent on death row before execution, would produce a general deterrent effect. (M. Radelet and R. Akers, Deterrence and the Death Penalty: The Views of the Experts, 1995) |
And:
quote:
Research reported in Homicide Studies, Vol. 1, No.2, May 1997, indicates that executions may actually increase the number of murders, rather than deter murders. Prof. Ernie Thomson at Arizona State University reported a brutalizing effect from an execution in Arizona, consistent with the results of a similar study in Oklahoma. |
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Lancer
|
|
Oregon Coast, USA! or Bohol, Philippines!
Apr 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
"And no, if someone murders my children, they will not get a "civilized" response from me."
I disagee Mike. I believe that what they would get from you would be a 'civilized' response'. You might take it out on them, but this to me is in favor of civilization. What the guy did is in the extreme, anti civilization. Skinning this guy and BBQing him WOULD be civilized, because it would be justice. No. It wouldn't be. Nothing can bring justice after the fact, but it would be as close to justice as could be had without undoing the horrific crime, which isn't possible, sadly. It might or might not deter crime, but extreme punishment for the misuse and murder of children would still be as close as humanly possible to justice.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Boris Godunov
|
 |
Portland, OR
Aug 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Actually you haven't. Unless all other things are equal you haven't shown anything. How can you be sure that without the death penalty the murder rate would not be higher? Have we accounted for social or cultural changes at all? |
Since I said that the comparison had to made across states undergoing comparable social and cultural occurences, I'd say I did account for such a thing. If you compare states as such, you will get a better sense of how effective a deterrent it is.
quote: And of course, you haven't addressed the people who don't care if the DP is a deterrant (like me). |
And, of course, we've only been arguing about deterrence, so whether or not you care about it is irrelevant to the discussion.
quote:
They gave the cite. It probably wouldn't have been very good of them to give the entire study without permission. |
They could give links, and quotes. They don't quote, they just make the claims. Frankly, I wouldn't be surprised if they were taking it out of context. And they seem to be willing to ignore the statistical comparisons that do show there is no demonstrated deterrent. The fact that this study supposedly quantifies the number of lives saved per execution is rather tell-tale.
quote: Interesting chart:
|
Indeed, but it also fails to address the points you made above, doesn't it?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|