 |
|
CerberusIV
|
|
quote: Originally posted by The Emperor Fabulous
That's a lot less than 80 kilos Cerberus |
If you're a suicide bomber who doesn't mind a lethal radiation dose and you don't care if it goes off in transit you can strip it down to that kind of size by dumping the casing and safety devices.
Then again if a nuclear device could be reduced to something that simple everyone would be making them.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
lightblue
|
|
L'Boro, UK
Oct 2001 time: 05:33
|
|
If they had access to plutonium that is...
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by obstructor
Mass destruction weapons can`t be found on every corner despite what you government thinks.
I respect a bit of paranoia but this si too much.
|
Mass destruction weapons can't be found on every corner. They can be found on ANY corner.
That is the problem. I personally think the first step is to sit down and try to work these issues out.
In any conflict
1. What does the other side want?
2. What will they give in return?
3. How far are they willing to go to get it?
4. How far are we willing to go to keep it?
5. Is theri cause just? Is ours just?
6. How does the other side feel about our cause?
and etc..
For example,
The problem in Afghanistan stems partly from a broken promise the U.S. made to help rebuild after the war with the USSR, and the question of sovereignty in Saudi Arabia. How bad the we want to stay in Saudi Arabia. How bad did we want Al qaida after they started target U.S. interests? Was dialogue ever attempted. Could the whole 9-11 tragedy have been avoided if we had kept our promise to rebuild or if we would have agreed to give assistance in return for peace(i.e. keep our promise).
When dialogue fails then we should resort to violence in self defense.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by jimmytrick
Customs?
Tons of illegal drugs are smuggled into America each year. |
The regulations for Nukes are quite different. You absolutely have to take it through customs. That's how we had the incident at Hiroshima.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Sandman
Were I a terrorist leader, I'd not bother wasting my precious suitcase nuke on a soft target, slaughtering thousands of people, which would just enrage the rest of the population. It's surely powerful enough to severely damage a military base, or an oil refinery. |
Logical, yes, but where's the terror in that? Damaging an oil refinery or a military base wouldn't do jack to the United States (or many other nations) in the long run. Taking out a chunk of a good-sized city is another story altogether, though.
They don't call 'em terrorists 'cause they hit police stations, kill soldiers and whatnot. Nice, big, juicy soft targets pulsating with innocents are the prime ribs of terrorists.
Gatekeeper
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
Osama Bin Laden is a highly intelligent charismatic innovative leader. He does not see himself as terrorist. He sees himself as a freedom fighter.
If you were him, would you blow up a nuclear device at this point in time. This would be absolute worst time to use a nuclear weapon against the U.S.. I'm sure that he never imagined what would happen when he blew up the WTC. Know one imagined it even though it had been attacked several times. For a leader, this was a PR nightmare. Only one country in the entire world came to his aid. Who would help him now if he sat off a nuke.
People make the mistake of thinking that Mr. Bin Laden, Mr. Bush, or any other leader is not intelligent because they don't understand there methods. I don't understand President Bush but he persuaded millions of people to vote for him, he persuaded congress to allow him to invade Iraq the same as another leader persuaded men to give their lives for a cause that we don't understand. In the aftermath both men have to justify their actions to their followers and the world around them or they will lose.
In short Al qaida will not be blowing up nukes in the forseeable future or they lose.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
Actually, no: If Al Qaeda blows a nuke, they win. Even if their organization falls apart, America will act more intensly than it is now.
America will lose every ally it has. America will get bogged down in so many messes.
The American people will be terrorized, and America probably will fall deeper into despotism.
Al Qaeda suceeded in its goal on Sep11, and would suceed again with the detonation of a nuclear device.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:33
|
|
america isnt going to lose allies if its nuked. It's in how america reacts that it will lose allies.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MRT144
|
|
Seattle Washington
Oct 2002 time: 21:33
|
|
i dont think america acted completely irrational in some regards. In others though we have gone overboard. The thing im afraid of is something happening where Bush feels he needs to sieze control of the government idefinitely. I dont think he would be hasty in doing that given the right circumstances.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ravagon
|
|
Australia
Sep 1999 time: 13:33
|
|
I'm curious comrade ... What exactly do you find irrational about the way the US handled post Sept 11?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Oncle Boris
|
 |
Once in a brown moon
Aug 2001 time: 00:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ravagon
I'm curious comrade ... What exactly do you find irrational about the way the US handled post Sept 11? |
There is the Iraq war, which doesn't even desserve explanation. Just about everyone in the world is pissed at America for their unilateralism, and the country is on the verge of civil war.
Then there's the Patriot Act, which will do about nothing good. Efficient intelligent services need not abuse their citizen's privacy to prevent terrorism.
What about Afghanistan? Did you know why the Taliban were in power, in the first place? Because Karzai's Northern Alliance had been even worse, which is what allowed the Taliban to build up on the opposition against them.
Now, the Taliban warlords are controlling most of the countryside again, and Muslim fundamentalism is on the rise. America is screwing the humanitarian help they were supposed to give, and, in such, are not showing to the Afghan people their commitment towards helping them. The situation will probably worsen when Osama gets caught, if he hasn't already.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ravagon
I'm curious comrade ... What exactly do you find irrational about the way the US handled post Sept 11? |
To put it quite simply, the US has been acting like an arrogant ass all over the world.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
I can't believe I'm saying this...
I agree with Dissident.
"bullshit.
they would have used them by now"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
President Bush/FDR did not plan the wars the U.S. was involved in that's not necessarily the job of the leader. IMO, the best leaders are the ones who can gather the talent and make them work for you.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|