 |
|
Pax
|
|
Skywalker,
1. Let's nuke Jerusalem to show the muslims we mean business. That is one of their holy cities.
2. Put the nuke down and step away from the baby.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Gatekeeper
|
 |
United States of America
Feb 2000 time: 23:33
|
|
In the end, I tend to agree with those who postulate that if al-Qaida possessed suitcase nukes, they would've used them by now. If not America, then in Europe. Since neither has happened, al-Qaida's bite is likely limited to more conventional means. Sept. 11, 2001, was their, ah, high-water point. It's been draining ever since.
Nonetheless, it can't hurt to keep one's eyes, ears and other senses open for stuff like this. Just don't put tinfoil on your head. It really doesn't stop the aliens from reading your mind.
Gatekeeper
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
I thought that we were invited into Saudi Arabia by the Saudi government? It's not like we had a role in the establishment of the monarchy, we were just a colony when that happpened. It's not like we made their government ultra-conservative, they did that to themselves. Finally, its not like al-Quaida is a staunch supporter of the principles of democracy - they had ample opportunity to establish a democracy in Afghanistan, but they did not. If the US pulls its military missions out of Saudi Arabia do you honestly believe that al-Quiada will fold its tents and disappear into the desert? I will bet you good money that when the US mission leaves S. A. al-Quiada will put forth a new set of demands, probably along the lines of destroying Israel.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
GePap
|
 |
of the Big Apple
Nov 2001 time: 23:33
|
|
This discussion keeps coming on: the insane (let me repeat, insane) beliefe that if Islamic terrorist used nukes vs the west, that somehow a valid (or event intelligent) response would be to nuke the HOly cities. First, anyone who thinks that has the same deluded mindset of an Osama Bin Laden about who and what is a valid target in one's "war".
But two, as I said above, nothing, NOTHING, would be more adventagous to Al qaeda than such an act. It would set off a wave of indgination accross the entire muslim world so massive that it would sweep away most pro-western leaders, radicalize any borderline muslims, and wipe away any claim to morality from the west: anyone here that thinks Osama Bin Laden and his folks would be deeply hurt by such ana ct and thus would not act trying to avoid it are the trully deluded ones. Why should they care if the west were to give them thier greatest possible rallying cry? What could move Muslims more than the mass slaughter of people in thier holy cities? Nothing
See, this is what people don't. Since these guys would not be acting with state support, any attack vs a state as retaliaiton would be utterly inappropriate. Which is why if they trully had WMD's, they have NO rational reason to hold them back- they win nothing by doing so.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vanguard
|
|
Monster Island
Apr 1999 time: 05:33
|
|
Arab newspapers are not the most reliable sources of information available.
They are frequently not even as good as Fox News.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|