 |
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:33
|
|
Hrmm I didn't realise we were allowed to do that, but I guess I just simulated it anyway.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Snowflake
|
 |
falling, once again
Apr 2003 time: 23:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Maniac
This situation with reloads and (un)official turns etc made me think about another hypothetical scenario. I was wondering, what would you decide if a member, who is not at all an official turnplayer, without permission played the turn well before the deadline has passed, and clearly diverged from the official orders already written at that moment?
There is the case of Jamski playing the turn and declaring Vendetta on the Angels IIRC, but that was when the Hive deadline had already long passed, so that's a special case AFAIK.
Recently t_ras also posted the Hive turn while there was apparently an order wrong executed, but I don't know what is t_ras' position in the Hive, and to what degree he misplayed the turn, so I don't know if that resembles my hypothetical situation above.
Just asking so I know more clearly what the rules are. 
|
This situation indeed need to be discussed and a rule needs to be set up for the new ACDG game, in my opinion. The Mead incident of Hive later is another example. Appearantly Mead has had different understandings from the others in the Hive at the time of him playing the turn, dispite that the Hive has had clear instructions (almost for the first time) and a few other players were online trying to stop him. I had strongly opposed his turn to be used. The reason was actually not related to the game itself so much as to the players. We just got Rubin at the time and he was assigned to chair CMC and I didn't want him to be forced out of the game because his authority is not recognized. (From his posts he said things like double comandary system is not necessary and indicated that he would resign.) I do still stick to what I did, and I was willing to go with any rulings from the CMNs. However I understand that it created a lot of turmoils. I think it will definitely help if we set up a clear rule for this kind of situations.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:33
|
|
You come across as having strong opinions on legality, I guess that's why they didn't want your input.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kody
|
|
If life's standing still and your soul's confused
Jun 2003 time: 14:33
|
|
That was just because the hive hated the university. It was already too late for you to unify anyway, you needed to have done that 10 tens earlier to change the outcome of the game.
If one of my team mates did that I would lobby to get him banned from all diplomatic issues.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Maniac
|
 |
Gent, Belgium
Jul 1999 time: 06:33
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kody
If one of my team mates did that I would lobby to get him banned from all diplomatic issues. |
*sigh* Do I really have to do this? 
1> You seem to be forgetting that everyone in the Consciousness was aware of this deception and that I was actively encouraged to fully exploit and capitalize it.
Some quotes:
quote: Originally posted by Impaler[WrG]
My GOOOD!! What a Fooopaaa! |
quote: Originally posted by obstructor
 |
quote: Originally posted by GeoModder
Btw, way to go Maniac  |
quote: Originally posted by Skanky Burns
Superb work, capitalizing on that! |
If you want to be consistent you should have to ban the entire Consciousness from diplomacy, and not just focus on "one of the team mates".
Compared to those quotes, I think my opinion was rather neutral. I didn't consider this tactic morally "good" or absolutely "bad". I just opportunistically continued with it as it benefitted us for a while. However in the team pledge for ACDG3 there's a clause not to pretend to be someone of another team, so of course I wouldn't do this again.
2> I've read a bit in all open team forum and all factions including mine have lied, cheated and exploited to a certain degree, though some go to great lengths to convince themselves of the opposite. Of course everyone will think that the cheats and exploits of the other teams are worse than those of their own team, but I don't see any fundamental ground why one exploit would be worse than another. So I will note your opposition to the 'buster deception', but I will just see it as a personal opinion like many others, and I won't care a damn if anyone complains about anything I or the CyCon have done in this game. I'll just consider it hypocritical.
3> Quotes from you in the Heart of Fire turn tracking thread:
quote: Also I'm kindof still wondering what Maniac is going to do now. He's been quite the "burn all cheaters" in the past, and it appears now that my actions were more questionable than his. |
quote: It already has gone awry. You shouldn't have mentioned Drones.... |
You seem to be afraid I'll start some flamewars regarding cheats against everyone or so. Please note that I haven't complained about any questionable action of another faction since the fora are open. (That message re buster and super-terraforming was with a ) Instead I've expressed the view (like 3 posts above) that I don't consider any exploit worse than another. You on the other hand have already mentioned your negative opinion about the buster issue several times. Please stop doing that. You sent me a PM a while back you wanted to start with a clean slate and forget the past. Have you changed your mind?
Edit: I guess someone will post next that I should "lighten up". That's what I want to do, but Kody keeps expressing his negative opinion. 
Last edited by Maniac on 16-06-2004 at 00:14
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:33. Apolyton Time is 00:33. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|