 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Personally, I'd like to know why people keep assuming the movie is anti-Jewish. |
I'm only going off of what I've read, but honestly, I don't know whether the movie or Gibson is anti-Semitic. Like I've said, the jury's still out. OTOH, regardless of whether Gibson is anti-Semitic, if the movie ends up ressurecting a long dead canard, shame on the movie and on him.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Dr Strangelove
|
|
The idea of a postscript is a good one. I can think of a number of ways that they could de-fuse the controversy.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shi Huangdi
*SNIP* Moreover, the most offensive scene in the move that Jewish groups complained about was removed. |
Nope... that scene is still in... but they're talking in Aramaic, and there's no subtitle. However, everyone will know its that scene by the absence of a subtitle.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by DinoDoc
Why is it OK to assume that the movie is anti-Jew? |
because its based on the pro-roman, anti-jewish gospels, written to promote the Roman Catholic church?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
How are the Gospels 'pro-roman' and 'anti-Jewish'? |
They were written to promote the new religion, looking for converts from the old religion (or stealing fence sitters.)
They were naturally going to paint the Romans as less evil bastards than they were, and the Jews as culpable.
Its just propaganda... advertising... whatever you want to call it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Edan
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
Well the Jews were involved in killing Jesus. That really can't be denied. So if that is what is mainly being objected to, then the arguments have little merit.
|
The Jews or some Jews? Involved or directly responsible?
quote: How is any of that anti-semetic? Why does he have to say it was a planned operation or death camps? He said it was an atrocity; does he have to spell out everything? |
Well, it sounds to me like he's stating that the planned genocide was just another of the many downsides of war, like collateral damage, famines, shortages, evacuations, and so on. War is hell, **** happens, that sort of thing. The holocaust was a deliberate, large scale industrial mass production of death in a 20th century scientifically advanced country that had been a decade before a democracy, the foundations of which were being set up before the war (making blaming the war a cop out).
I find an answer that treats the holocaust as just another "well, war is hell, **** happens" sort of incident as an attempt to minimize the holocaust. His answer is vague enough that I'm giving him the benefit of the doubt, but it's a damned stupid way to clearly answering the question on the record as stating that yes, the holocaust happened.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
The truth is that the jews in charge at the time did have the Romans kill jesus. That does not mean that all Jews stabbed Jesus in the Back and then he said Et tu Benjamin. The same way German government is responsible for the Holocaust. But Germans were'nt grabbing Jews off the street and throwing them into there ovens at home and all Jews were not a party to the death of Christ.
If mel gibson pretty much sticks to the bible the evidence is damning against the jewish temple. If you believe in the bible then you believe that jesus challenged their power as any revolutionary seeing and unjust practice would and he was killed for it. You can hardly blame the jews of today for that. You really can't even blame the temple for wanting to hold on to their power.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
I doubt that could be substantianted in any manner to satisfy most critical thinkers. |
Particularly since Pilate was a bit of a sociopathic lunatic, not given to indecision about putting people to death in the most gruesome manner possible. In fact he got the notice of Rome, due to his particularly cruel repression of the Samaritan uprising, whereafter he was called back to Rome, and didn't get further assignment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MrBaggins
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ben Kenobi
You assume that the Bible seeks to convert Jews. How would they do so by demonising them? |
By painting the hierachy of their faith as ungodly.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Boris Godunov
I doubt that could be substantianted in any manner to satisfy most critical thinkers. |
Let me rephrase that. I don't believe the bible to be 100 percent accurate. According to the bible. Jesus was killed because he threatened the power of the temple priests.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Pax
|
|
I agree it is good enough to say the jews did it. Just like the Germans and etc. Realizing that it was the governing authority that made the decision.
Jews, Muslims, and Christians should get over who did what 2,000 years ago so we can eventually work whose to blame for the crusades.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Bereta_Eder
|
|
A film couldn't have hoped for better publicity.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|