 |
Your views on Marriage (foreigners select elsewhere answers only please)
This poll is closed. |
| I live in USA: Heterosexual Marriage Only |
   |
13 |
7.22% |
| I live in USA: Homosexual Civil Unions Only |
   |
9 |
5.00% |
| I live in USA: Full Homosexual Marriage Rights |
   |
45 |
25.00% |
| I live in USA: #3 + Further Extend Rights to Polygamy |
   |
17 |
9.44% |
| I live in USA: #1 only and extending rights to Polygamy |
   |
0 |
0% |
| I live in USA: Extend Marriage to Bannanas |
   |
4 |
2.22% |
| Elsewhere: Heterosexual Marriage Only |
   |
16 |
8.89% |
| Elsewhere: Homosexual Civil Unions Only |
   |
11 |
6.11% |
| Elsewhere: Full Homosexual Marriage Rights |
   |
46 |
25.56% |
| Elsewhere: #9 + Further Extend Rights to Polygamy |
   |
13 |
7.22% |
| Elsewhere: #7 only and extending rights to Polygamy |
   |
1 |
0.56% |
| Elsewhere: Extend Marriage to Bannanas |
   |
5 |
2.78% |
| Total: |
180 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
I'd keep marriage between man and a women. and hand out civil union rights to any loving committed and consenting adults.
as far I haven't seen an intellectually valid redefining of marriage that lets gay ppl in but no1 else.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
I haven't seen any intellectually valid reason we should let 5,000 year old sheep hearders tell us what to do. |
we could have an argument, or a war of quips. obviously u much prefer the latter. but I recommend the former every once in a while.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Big Crunch
All legal rights and benefits associated with marriage should be electable to whomever you choose. In a legal sense isn't marriage just a contract between two consenting participants?
As far as ceremonies and weddings if you want a public display of commitment then by all means do it, and do it as many times and with as many people as you want. |
why just 2? I hardly think the number 2 is less arbitrary than "man and women"
|
|
|  |
 |
|
yavoon
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Big Crunch
I never said just two. Reread my post.
There are of course tax and other legal complications with extending rights and benefits currently associated with marriage to more than one other person.
For example, here in the UK, if you could marry as many people as you liked you could conceivably negate, in its entirety, inheritance tax. |
lotsa ppl sue over "why other ppl marry." especially when they get divorced. thats just one more thing to sue over.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Capt Dizle
|
|
Bananas have rights too!
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|