 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
loinburger
|
 |
Sweet Sauce Jones
Jul 1999 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by General Ludd
Obviously their society has changed so that farming for sustinance, or whatebver their previous way of life was, is no longer viable. |
Did you cite a source for this claim somewhere in here, or are you just making stuff up? (I've been gone for awhile, and you seem to have changed your username, so I can't remember if you're one of the competent debaters, or if you're one of the people who go around making bald assertions and then challenging other people to refute them.)
As for Walmart treating employees like crap, I believe it. I had two retail jobs while I was in high school, one for a mom-and-pop shop and one for a store in a medium-sized hardware store chain (the chain was local to Illinois and Wisconsin, with maybe a few stores in Indiana). They were both crap jobs. My sister-in-law is currently working retail for a mom-and-pop shop out in California, and from everything she's said it's a crap job. Retail jobs are crap jobs, period. That being said, I preferred working at the chain than at the mom-and-pop store. My manager (also the owner of the store) at the mom-and-pop store made it clear to me that I could be fired on a whim. However, if they arbitrarily fired me at the chain then there were still several rungs of the ladder where I could file complaints, and in fact that was the only thing that kept me in that job for so long (the department manager hated my guts, but he was already on thin ice with the store manager, so he couldn't afford my causing trouble if he fired me for no reason).
The biggest difference I've found between various retail jobs, from my own experience and from talking to others, is that the major chains tend to be much more careful about not throwing some of the crap at their employees that the smaller chains will. The reason for this is that the major chains have deep pockets, so they're targets for lawsuits, and it's usually cheaper for them to settle out of court than to fight out the lawsuit. Some of the crap that my sister-in-law has had to deal with at her mom-and-pop retail job would be ground for a lawsuit if she were dealing with deep pockets, but as things stand it's her word against theirs, and the mom-and-pop store doesn't stand to lose any business over her suing them for treating their employees like ****. That's about the only difference, actually -- retail jobs are still crap jobs, either way you slice it.
Last edited by loinburger on 21-03-2004 at 09:35
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
PeteH
|
|
Chances are, for most of the history of the area, there were no sweatshops, and people lived just fine. They may have been 'primative' but they also probably didnt have a garbage dump to sift through at all, never mind as an alternative to slave labor conditions.
It amazes me when people can just pick some arbitrary date and decide that after *this* point, its just how things are... "its either a sweatshop or garbage, but hey at least you have a choice" How about the choice to be de-colonized and their land repaired, that would be a real choice
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|