 |
|  |
 |
|
shawnmmcc
|
|
Boris and Q-Cubed, please look at my earlier posts in this thread. The mom has been born again, and I got to listen to interviews with both of them. Evidently the courts in California decided to let her sue for sole custody AFTER they had joint custody, and for whatever reason decided to award it to her. From his comment at the Supreme Court (an aetheist cannot get elected in this country, he got applause and Rehnquist threatened to clear the galleries), and the direct experiences some of our friends have had (the worst was a Jewish father here in Kentucky got the converted Sufi mom BANNED from even metioning that "cult" to her children, as the judge understood it, and yes the ACLU got involved, but in family court the judge is god with a little g) that the dad's aetheism may easily have had something to do with it. It's OK to be born again in Christ, in fact the courts like you then when it comes to sentencing and custody. Don't be gay or an aetheist.
So he now sees not only does his wife get to terminate his joint custody, now the state is further telling his daughter that he's wrong. I'd be a mite bit irritated, too. Of course I also know that it NEVER pays to be vocal (he is), on a topic the judge is more than likely (over 95% chance) to disagree with you, and to be eloquent about it. Yes, he probably took a 12 gauge to his foot. But he's not USING his daughter, he really feels this. As I said before, you should never sleep with someone whith whom you disagree that much (Zykla and Self-Biased please note! )
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Guynemer
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Imran Siddiqui
(you don't have to say it if you don't want to) |
pffffftttt.
When it is recited in schools, kids are de facto coerced into saying it.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gamenaught
|
|
What does "one nation under God" mean? Is it true?
Are we a theocracy? No. Are all Americans subordinate to 1 God? No. Assuming it were ture, are we the only nation under God? No.
So why keep a lie in the pledge?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kirnwaffen
|
 |
Tryin' hard to chill in the city of Dis
Jul 2000 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: When it is recited in schools, kids are de facto coerced into saying it. |
Every last one of those kids has the absolute right to not say it. Doesn't sound like coercion to me.
Last edited by Kirnwaffen on 28-03-2004 at 07:14
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kirnwaffen
Every last one of those kids has the absolute right to not say it. Doesn't sound like coercion to me. |
???
That is a false dichotomy. Sure, they have the absolute right to not say it, but if the teacher is encouraging the class to stand up and say it, and most other kids are going along with it, the child will feel obligated or influenced to take part in the recital. That's influencing someone to do something they may not like or believe in. That's coercion.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kuciwalker
|
 |
of Schmooism
Feb 2001 time: 00:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Rogan Josh
One implication I read from the article, is that there is no religious education in American public schools?
Is this true? 
How do American kids learn the differences between Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Budhism, Hindi etc if it is not allowed to be taught in schools?
Perhaps we are seeing the root of the US's foreign policy problems... |
It's called "Comparative Religions" - it's an elective course.
EDIT: oh, and we study things like the Ramayana, Taoism, Confucionism, Buddhism, Greek and Roman religions, and both Testaments in English class. Next year, I believe, we do Islam too. (Ironically, we haven't read a single piece of actually English literature in English class all year )
Last edited by Kuciwalker on 28-03-2004 at 09:45
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kucinich
Uh, no it isn't. |
coercion
n 1: the act of compelling by force of authority
_________
"Alright, children, let's all stand and say the pledge of allegiance."
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kucinich
Moreover, you seem to be missing the posts pointing out (and I can second this) that virtually no one says anything during the pledge, and fewer actually say the words. |
(I answer this part of your post in a different post for... no reason.)
Anyway: I don't like that line of argument. It's akin to saying "Well, it's okay that my children are influenced to say 'I hate white people so much and I hope they die' every morning at school, because really, no one pays much attention to the recital... The mostly just mumble the worlds!".
Well, mumble or not, the words are still there, plain as day. Even if they're just being read aloud to the class: it's still getting into the back of their mind, like much of their other schoolwork.
2 + 2 = 4.
America is one nation under God.
Little Billy doesn't know the difference.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
cinch
|
|
Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
Jul 2002 time: 22:34
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Kucinich
You just proved yourself wrong. |
So a teacher has no force of authority over the class?
The central authority figure is encouraging the children to stand and recite the pledge. They are not being literally FORCED, obviously, but they are being COMPELLED.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:34. Apolyton Time is 00:34. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|