 |
|
ceroomaster
|
|
Casnewydd, Cymru
Aug 2002 time: 05:35
|
|
The forum is nearly dead. Only three topics left (one of those is topped & can't vanish from the list).
Any ideas on how we can revitalise this forum and get more people reinterested?
Is reinterested even a word?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ceroomaster
|
|
Casnewydd, Cymru
Aug 2002 time: 05:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by joncha
One idea (I haven't thought this through too far) is to vote in the UN as a regional bloc. We could debate the merits of pending resolutions and decide (democratically) which way we should vote. |
Do you mean all the nations in the region get a vote, and then everybody vote the same regardless of personal opinion?
quote: Originally posted by Crimson Sunrise
It'd certainly be easier to track the way older debates went if threads were used; the regional forums at NationStates.net push the old posts off the page.
|
Sort of ties in with the above, if we debated the resolutions here then we're not going to lose any info. We tend not to discuss much more than that on the regional board at the moment.
Next time there is a proposal up for debate, I will start a thread here and post a link to the thread on the region board, perhaps?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ceroomaster
|
|
Casnewydd, Cymru
Aug 2002 time: 05:35
|
|
Also, would there be any interest in an Apolyton region site, some of the most successful regions have them:
The Heartland
Meritocracy
Are just two examples I was able to find.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
joncha
|
 |
North of FOPOG
Jan 2003 time: 21:35
|
|
I think the forum here should be our region site, I don't see the need for a new domain.
As for the regional UN idea, it was just that... an idea. And, yes, under the original plan we would be compelled to vote as a bloc. The plus side of this is a united regional UN position and vigorous debate, the down side is groups in the minority may just leave the UN.
Plan B would be a forum to debate resolutions. However, if the groups decisions aren't binding it may just end up being one post each of "my nation will vote yes/no" and no debate.
Plan C is that votes are binding, but those opposed can abstain. This way at least you aren't "forced" to vote for something you don't like.
Plan D could be organized UN factions. We could form a progressive bloc, a law and order bloc, a bleeding-heart liberal bloc, etc. and have their positions binding on their (wholey voluntary) membership.
Whichever way we go, it should serve to revitalize this forum. I'm just throwing out these ideas for some debate.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ceroomaster
|
|
Casnewydd, Cymru
Aug 2002 time: 05:35
|
|
Wasn't suggesting abandoning the forum, just having the 'extras', like maps etc, handled elsewhere.
I think Plan D could be interesting, but I don't think that there are enough people playing at the moment to make it viable.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
ceroomaster
|
|
Casnewydd, Cymru
Aug 2002 time: 05:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Frankychan
Someone else has 30 and 31. I've asked Rasputin to let me have 73 and 74. |
The rule was one spot per nation, and it's only fair that this should still apply. Otherwise, Ceroo with its population 9.5 times the size of Frankychanland should be allowed another 9 spots on the map? I would say that was unfair and rightly so.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|