 |
| |
|
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001
time: 07:35
|
|
quote:
1. I am not an officer on this ship, hence my wage is not in relation with my rank. I am a civilian. |
True. You are even higher in stature, emphasising my point. Or are you saying that a simple crewman would have more holidays and wage than a senator?
quote:
I haven't had any means of control on the ship. The control of the ship was passed according to the hierarchy (and it may even fall down to you if you continue killing officiers like that), and I haven't any say about it, simply because these military affairs are out of my juridiction. |
This point was, as I said, far-fetched and I don't see it as an integral part of my argument. Even if you could get control of the ship, it'd be rather meaningless since it has no bearings on whether or not you can off people. Perhaps you just picked the officers on random.
quote:
3. I am a member of the Earth senate, and as such, the HongHu empire would have never trusted me such a potent (and potentially destructive) technology. Even if I had been envoyed to HongHu, I would have been monitored in this regard. And my middle-aged self is much easier to monitor than a young intrepidic shuttle pilot  |
But to become a senator, one usually has connections. More often than not, suspicious connections. Of course the HongHu Empire didn't actually give it to you, my gift implication was a simple suggestion. HongHu would've probably recalled an Earth senator getting such technology, anyway.
Nor would it be a point of monitoring the individual, since you'd be sitting in your office while whoever it is you've hired is fetching you the goods. Slipping in a shuttle just like that, however, I figure would be rather complicated.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Ljube
|
 |
Belgrade
May 2003
time: 06:35
|
|
And there is also Kassi's behaviour under pressure. He didn't include some of the clues he wasn't able to interpret in a way to incriminate somebody else.
But the key argument in this matter is, like always, post stats analysis. I conducted this analysis a week ago, but didn't want to present its results for two reasons.
First, people are very sceptical concerning post stats as they think this can be faked. However, so far, in each of my two previous games, post stats have been proven to be indispensable to eliminate a number of suspects. Remember, post stats can't prove someone is guilty, but they can prove someone is innocent.
Second, in mafia 2, I published my findings very early and Comrade Tassadar went through my list killing all people I marked as innocent. I wanted to avoid that.
So, what is the conclusion of post stats? We have 2 spammers alive (ADG and Theben) and one moderate poster (Kassi). Spammers are best for post stats analysis cause they never miss a post when they are online. Initial analysis of the first kill revealed ADG's innocence (he wasn't online between two Jamski's posts). Theben on the other hand was, but he was offline 6 days in a row during last week. Kassi was online in the incriminating period.
This leads to the conclusion ADG and Theben couldn't have done it, so Kassiopeia must have done it.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35.
Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
15-04-2004 19:16
|