 |
|
MFCamillus
|
|
It is a little out of character.
However the issue is that in PBEM you may never see what it is that killed you so you do not know what the opponent has. It is a stabilizing feature to make up for the fact that in PBEM you many times do not see fast units that attack you.
When playing the computer you can watch your opponents moves and the combat happen, in PBEM you cannot. It was something developed sometime back for tournament play that I personally find rather fair so that it makes up for the lack of vision to the combat in PBEM. Now if it only had a "view combat" feature it would be great and the notes would not be useful
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
snoopy369

|
 |
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004 time: 23:35
|
|
ooc : Paddy, this sort of thing in a PBEM is fairly important. In an AI game, you have "reputation", that the AIs seem to know if you've broken deals with other AIs instantly and for long periods of time. In a PBEM, you have the same thing, but it's not definite -- ie, one person could say one thing and one person another.
As such, when I'm told that you made a peace treaty and then broke it immediately, I want to hear your side of the story first before I take any action. I'm doing you that favor, because making and then immediately breaking a peace treaty is one of the worst things that you can do from my standpoint. I see our agreement as depending on mutual trust -- and if you're breaking treaties with other people right after making them, I see no reason to trust you to keep your side of our agreement.
On the other hand, I'd like to give you a chance to explain if this has been misrepresented or misunderstood, as that happens a lot in human-human interactions. 
/ooc
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
snoopy369

|
 |
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004 time: 23:35
|
|
The Germans are glad to hear of the peace found between Spain and England. Mayhaps this will be the first of many turns played without the dreaded Battle Report.
Germany is saddened to hear that our esteemed Colleagues are afraid of our might. Do not be jealous of our success, for success it is to have such a mighty nation amdist the constant danger of war. Nay, be proud to be amongst greatness.
Germany does not intend war, and, barring provocation, shall not make war on any of our Friendly nations. We expand our borders such that the German people may benefit from trade and the hard work which characterizes the German people.
We would gladly see other nations continue colonizing the various Islands of this world, but do not intend to halt our great mission of peace and prosperity. We in fact encourage the newly peaceable nations of England and Spain to seek out new shores and plant their flags, as there are yet many unsettled islands amongst us, and many opportunities for their growth and prosperity, such that they might one day soon rival our own greatness, and bring a better world to us all.
Turn sent. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
MFCamillus
|
|
I have it.
It came yesterday. Trying to dig out from some detritous in the mess from a short holiday week here.
I need to get something for Chrisius and then will get to work on this one.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
snoopy369

|
 |
Of the Peanuts Gallery
Apr 2004 time: 23:35
|
|
The Germans are again saddened to hear that their righteous Expansion of the Great German State is causing offense to our friends the Americans. In the spirit of cooperation, we are willing to make a few compromises to ensure the survival and flourishing of the English and Spanish states.
To wit, we make the following suggestion for a Division of the Territories. Our general plan is to allow our nation and the American nation to occupy lands immediately near our homeland, to ensure our Safety in the event of military action. The remainder of lands, including most or all of the islands with several city squares possible, shall be divided between the Spanish and the English in the most logical and equitable divsion that is reasonable.
Note: This is a first draft, and the Germans would gladly take suggestions for making this more just. We are being rather rushed, so do not have an opportunity to double-check this for fairness.
We are willing to negotiate, although some of the squares we desire are necessary for our Safety, and will be very hesitant to give up. None of the cities already established shall be given up, but some islands already occupied will be 'shared' islands, to allow our friends opportunities to occupy quality city spaces. Where we state "Isle near X" we of course mean all of the island nearest, or in direction Y, to X. Where we state "Island with X city" we mean to state that that island shall be Shared, and often limit it to a single city or two.
With that, our suggestion:
Spanish:
- Isle with cow near Hannover
- Isle with oasis (Hannover) one city
- tundra isle SE of Madrid (with Oil)
- isle E of Madrid, S of Hannover
- isle with Heidelberg
English:
Isle w/horse and Seattle
isle w/marsh NE of seattle
isle NE of Hill that Was
tundra isle (long and skinny) N of Hill that Was
tundra isle w/oil S of My Joint
jungle NW of Nuremberg, W side
Germans:
Jungle SE of My Joint
Isle w/San Francisco, 1 city
Isle NE of Leipzig E of Chicago
Isle W of Leipzig
jungle isle NW of Nuremberg - E side
Americans:
Isle E of New York
Isle w/horse near Konigsberg
Isle W of above horse isle
Isle w/Chicago (all of island)
Isle E of chicago (2 W of horse isle)
The Germans thank you for your consideration of our suggestion. We will gladly explain any confusing or mislabelled directions.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
MFCamillus
|
|
1828 to Paddy.
I can see that I need to find some time while at work to review the non-negotiating.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|