 |
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:36
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Albert Speer
what? |
Than suddern change in orbit of than planet can be than very bad thing. To add 5.25.... days to the Earth Solar Year mean than major change in Earth orbit , Venus obit, and Mars orbit. The ancient name for these planet are different from the one we use today. The ancient world struggle with how the Earth Solar year change. In Egpty they have than myth about this which I must look up.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:36
|
|
what the hell does that have to do with anything i was talking about?
Last edited by Albert Speer on 02-06-2004 at 11:44
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:36
|
|
quote:
Originally posted by Albert Speer
what the hell does that have to do with anything i was talking about? |
What is desert in North Africa was once fertrale grassland and forest with than ancient civ going back more than 40,000 years than globical civ like our own. The coastline and the dept of the sea where different then. Than 4th dynat priest in a scroll we found state that Egypt was what remain of than ancient civ it was part of which streck back 40000 year from his date not our. The Egyptian try to keep than large lake in their desert from disappearing by builting than canul from the Nile river to it to bring in new water. It disappear into the desert sand no matter what they did. We found pre-dytmant writeing that was just as complex as the writeing from 3100 BCE and up. The Egyptianolgy expect the pre-dry writeing to be simpler. The Ancient Egyptian use the 360 days solar cal for the government use and afew religious holiday and the 365 days solar cal for common every day use.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:36
|
|
thats all fine and daddy but what does that have to do with my point that the Atlantean theorists seem to claim more-ancient-than-we-thought civilizations exist within a vacuum among a global sea of primitive hunter-gatherer societies?
if Atlantis existed or Egyptian civilization went back to 40000 BC, why was it that the rest of the world was so comparatively primitive (still Cro-Magnon Europe for god's sake!) but when civilization appeared (again) in 8000 BC, suddenly it appeared everywhere at once (Egypt, Syria, Mesopotamia, India, China) with, scientists are finding now, a great deal of contact between them.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999
time: 23:36
|
|
Hoff, ancient calendars were not 360 days, most had a 5 day period in addition to the 360 days and had various names for the extra days, we just add an extra day to some of the months instead. The Venus calendar of the Maya was even superior to western calendars until much more recent times.
UR and Hueij - can you quote from those links? I was reading Hueij's first link and got sidetracked reading Jane Sellers. I have her book and am a big fan... Unlike you Hueij, she doesn't accuse Bauval of being a fraud, just guilty of some mistakes. Here is a quote from her:
quote:
Both Hancock and Bauval still promote the intriguing idea that the pyramid builders had a very specific moment in the heavens that they wished to commemorate on the floor of the Giza plateau. They suggest that the Egyptians of the Fourth Dynasty knew of a time when Orion had been seen due south at the same time that the pole of the ecliptic was due north, and the vernal point due east. I had found it exciting to contemplate that the Egyptians used the meridian passage of Orion to signal the heliacal rising of certain stars that marked the vernal equinox date. However, I then realized that this wonderful astronomical conjunction occurred for only a very brief moment in time, and that moment was c.10,500 BC, more than 8,000 years before. |
She wrote a great book on the stellar religion of the ancient egyptians, a religion UR's link denies even existed by a guy who doesn't even know if Bauval's quotes of her are accurate. Her only problem with Bauval on this point is the great antiquity - 10,500 BC. That is not a problem for me since the ancients were far more in awe of the sky's movement than we are and would have spent alot of time watching, mapping, and measuring. Precession was why, the never ending flow of stars across the sky changed slowly over time. Hamlet's Mill deals with the importance ancient peoples placed on precession...
The most I got from those links was that while the Great Pyramids did line up just like Orion's Belt, a claim not challenged by those links, other stars and pyramids didn't match up exactly. I'd have to see how far off they are before concluding no connection existed given the obvious correlation between the 3 at Giza and Orion.
Speer - quote:
if Atlantis existed or Egyptian civilization went back to 40000 BC, why was it that the rest of the world was so comparatively primitive (still Cro-Magnon Europe for god's sake!) but when civilization appeared (again) in 8000 BC, suddenly it appeared everywhere at once (Egypt, Syria, Mesopotamia, India, China) with, scientists are finding now, a great deal of contact between them. |
If you had immense knowledge, would you share it with a bunch of people who could use it to kill you? It's called "arms control"  The Egyptians claimed their culture/civilisation went back tens of thousands of years as well as the Sumerians, but this was the time of the gods. Ever read the story of the Tower of Babel? It offers a motive as to why the unwashed masses were kept "primitive", once they acquired knowledge they tried to reach Heaven and this angered "God".
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:36
|
|
Berzerker:
and yet the egyptians and the sumerians (and the hittites and syrians... the indians and the chinese...) shared knowledge and goods immediately as they were civilizing...
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:36
|
|
and besides, there was a great deal of trade between India and the middle east in 4000 BC
|
|
| |
|
|
|
CharlesBHoff
|
|
el paso texas
May 2002
time: 05:36
|
|
Well the astord Belt between Mar and Juptier was form between 9500 BCE and 9000 CBE as the ancient have than name for the planet just destory by than stellar mass object that enter temp the solar system. Than astomer is saying this as the ancient have to change they cal to match the new orbit of the Earth around the sun. We are findly out the Unieverse isnot the stable unchangeing place we thought it was. The sun orbit around the galaxtic core in a 200 million year orbit.
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Albert Speer
|
|
Puerile Polemic
Mar 1999
time: 00:36
|
|
can someone tell me if charlesbhoff is a joke or not? he spews out this weird information as responses to me that have nothing to do with what i was saying... i say there was contact between civilizations of the bronze age and he starts talking about the asteriod belt... is he just playing with me?
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36.
Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
02-06-2004 06:15
|