 |
|
bob rulz
|
|
Alright. Well, I went to create an account, but I didn't realize that my storage box was full, so I didn't get the activation e-mail, and they don't let you use more than one account per e-mail. So, I need to close the acocunt, but I don't see any option there that lets me. Is it possible to close your account on CFC?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
bob rulz
|
|
"Email Thunderfall (at CFC) and he can send you another activation e-mail (or just activate your account for you)."
Okay I did that. How long does it usually take him to respond?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
bob rulz
|
|
I wish I was lucky enough to get 4 bonus resources in my starting area. I always have strategic resources but I almost never have luxury or bonus resources, makes things hard. The computer always hates me even when I don't do any ROP rapes or military alliance breakings, and I never raze cities unless it forces me to.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Artegon
|
|
I have played a couple of Emperor games and won them all. But what are you allowed to do? I usually take a couple of rounds to check out the nearest sorroundings and if things goes bad I re-load. I'm sure I could win at deuty level with this method, but I would take more saves and re-loads, perhaps so many that it would spoil the fun.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Silpy
|
|
The USA's European Colony
Sep 2002 time: 05:36
|
|
Chieftan 100%
Warlord 80%
Regent 65%
Monarch 50%
Emperor 20%
Demigod 5%
Deity Once!
Sid Never Played It.
But- I have only been killed off on Demigod and higher.
If I don't win, I still usally have a good standing.
And I have most luck with Persians. I've got them down to a fine art, it seems.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Silpy
|
|
The USA's European Colony
Sep 2002 time: 05:36
|
|
Yes, the Persians are a good newbie civ (along with Egypt & China) But I find them good even at the higher levels. I don't like the Zulus. I prefer the Mongols.
PS. I never reload. Ever. That's cheating!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shogun Gunner
Monarch is a level I can win at consistently. I will play higher levels, but I'm not into calculting probability, combat odds, production bonuses, etc, etc etc for every decision in each turn. It seems like the higher up in difficulty you go, the more that type of play is required.
I like to have fun and be able to save and come back days later without having to refresh my memory of the game by writing myself a book of notes because I can't afford one mistake. |
Hey Shogun Gunner:
I’m getting a bit more lax in my Sid games as time goes on because I’m finding that winning at the higher levels is not about micromanaging and being ultra-efficient but is rather based upon making sound strategic decisions. You’ll have an easier time of it if you manage your empires resources well…but you win games by concentrating upon; a turn by turn assessment of how you intend to get the win, what you must do to achieve that end, and what you must do not to lose before accomplishing that.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Shogun Gunner
Drachen,
That's an interesting take. I think I should try Emp or Sid at some point to see how I do. I think I'm ready for a challenge. I just bugs me to see the AI able to plop down two cities for every city I can plant.
Thanks for mentioning that -- I really hate the micromanagement/mathmatetical analysis approach, but I can deal with picking a sound strategy and managing that to victory. I haven't played enough on the higher levels to realize that. Thanks. |
Hey Shogun Gunner:
You’re welcome. As to the advantages the AI enjoys all I can say is you get used to it after awhile; accept it and watch the frustration fade away. Just start playing the next level up once you get comfortable at a level and your skills and strategies will evolve and improve. If I can be of any help just let me know.
Cheers
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Vince278
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Drachen
Hey Vince 278:
Nicely done. A cogent piece well reasoned and defended. Let me ask you though, if “out doing” the AI at higher levels in chess like manner is not in particularly fun, then what is it, from an aesthetic viewpoint, that you do find to be fun or satisfying about playing Civ? |
Thanks. I suppose I'm a role player and a war gamer at heart. When I take out a civ I'd like to think I outsmarted the civ, not my PC. As the levels near the top it become appearant that I need to take more of a Sun-Tzu approach. Playing multiplayer may come close to what I'd like to see but I realize it is virtually impossible (so far!) for the AI to emulate a real person.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Vince278
Thanks. I suppose I'm a role player and a war gamer at heart. When I take out a civ I'd like to think I outsmarted the civ, not my PC. As the levels near the top it become appearant that I need to take more of a Sun-Tzu approach. Playing multiplayer may come close to what I'd like to see but I realize it is virtually impossible (so far!) for the AI to emulate a real person. |
It does seem like multi will be your best bet. Good luck!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Drachen
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Aqualung71
In my admittedly short forays into MP, it frustrates the hell out of me. You just don't get the time to manage your empire efficiently, which makes the game very unsatisfying for what is essentially still a TBS. Added to that of course, are the madmen there who simply build 100 Jag Warriors and send them over to kill you and won't accept peace at any price, so you spend your time building defenders!
On the other hand, PBEM is the perfect medium for Civ3, though a little slow moving. |
From the little I know of multi I get the same impression and LAN and internet play are still a bit lag prone for my taste. The PBEM threads seems well populated although I’ve never played a PBEM game. What are your impressions of PBEM Aqualung71?
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|