 |
Should we attack Parthemunde or not? (4 days)
This poll is closed. |
| Yes |
   |
10 |
50.00% |
| No |
   |
8 |
40.00% |
| Abstain |
   |
2 |
10.00% |
| Total: |
20 voters |
100% |
|
|  |
 |
|
Adrian Hon
|
|
Living in Perplex City
Nov 2001 time: 05:36
|
|
Not doing bad, I'm actually working at a company in London designing Internet/reality games (at the same time as doing my PhD, hah!). I never did manage to publish that article in a magazine, partly due to the fact that I didn't have enough time to shop it around - there were some magazines that were interested, like PC Format, but I think it was a bit too long for them.
The article will probably end up going online on the web somewhere, either at Kuro5hin or here at Apolyton - wherever it'd get the most publicity.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
E_T
|
 |
Orlando, Florida
Mar 2001 time: 00:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrWhereItsAt
***Major SNIP****
Given the chance (since GWT seems to have a surfeit of GLs coming to them - Heroic Epic perhaps?) that the Ruhrpott strike will be nasty, but not deliver such the knock-out blow we need.
|
Maybe we can get Trip to figure out where is might be at. If it's available, it might be a worthy target to take out, even though it too can be rebuilt.
quote:
Parthemunde. Greatest in the cities of the world. Glittering jewel in GWT's Sceptre. Site of the Pyramids and Colossus, which (if they are using correctly) have advantaged GWT hugely for centuries, and will continue to do so for centuries more. They have 8 Medieval techs and 7 Industrial to go before Flight cancels that, and it's hardly likely they would go for that route.
|
The main thing that I have tried to impress on people for quite some time, that it gives them just too much overall advantatage, especially in combination with Leo's. If anything, with this gone, even if they quickyly rebuild the FP, the trade balance difference will be enough for us to get our GW's built, before they get to the Technologies (even at the reduced costs).
quote:
***Major SNIP****
That, my friends, is what we here in the colonies call a sh*tload (Assuming of course, I haven't arsed up in too many places here.)
|
AMEN!!!
quote:
I would risk a lot to take this city, which would be an enormous blow - psychological and real. GWT would NEVER recover from this. FPs can be rebuilt in an instant, but with the sheer trade scope of the Colossus, added to the food from the Pyramids, and the possibility of one day a Culture victory for GWT because of this damned city of Glories, I want Parthe out. Out, damned spot!
9 Knights to Parthe. This is the least we can do. Cap the bastard. |
Thank you MrWIA, for putting into the properverbage, of what I have been trying to impress on everyone for a long time.
* E_T thinks a well timed WIA post can be greater than 100 of my various postings, at various times.
If anything, it's a fantastic summation to all that has been discussed before and the current likely path of the game, if things continue without a successful Parth Strike. All of these things, and more, I was too fully aware of, when Trip had first proposed the Rhurpott strike and I had started Planning, because I know that THIS would also be our ONLY opportunity of Taking that Monster City down......Out, damned spot! INDEED!!!
MoI E_T
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Great men aren't made by standing behind the wall of fear and uncertainty.
Great men are made by taking risks.
Tell me a great man in history, and I will tell you a man that saw his chance and took it.
Parthemunde is a great risk. Great risks involve great rewards. Does Apolyton want to cower in the corner, afraid of GWT, or does Apolyton want to take control?
The FP strike is a strong blow against GWT. The Parthemunde strike is a strong blow against GWT. Both of them together is a crippling reduction in GWT's capacity.
We must end the threat while we still can.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: And if we take Ruhr with more than a couple of Knights left, how much more damage could we do there? The big ticket target is gone. Who cares if a few corrupt cities are left or gone? Cashing those 9 Knights in for Parthe is a gamble, but so is the whole thing. And that would be a far greater thing for them to do than to mill around an already killed core. |
The plan for Ruhr if we somehow win with 21 Elite Knights left is to rampage through the rest of the region, though, right?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kloreep

|
 |
of the pillow
Jun 2002 time: 00:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by MrWhereItsAt
The units are expendable anyway. Noone really expects them to return home safely do they? |
Expect? No. But I would like it, and they can be cheaply upgraded to kickass Cavalry, so we should try to evacuate them if possible. Don't throw any away. (Which is what I think is likely to happen with The Nine, but oh well... lost battle.)
quote: Originally posted by MrWhereItsAt
And if we take Ruhr with more than a couple of Knights left, how much more damage could we do there? The big ticket target is gone. Who cares if a few corrupt cities are left or gone? Cashing those 9 Knights in for Parthe is a gamble, but so is the whole thing. And that would be a far greater thing for them to do than to mill around an already killed core. |
It is true the old FP core won't be of much value. Considering the time it'll take them to rebuild the FP (sans leader) the main benefit would probably be from razing their cities' improvements rather than from "depriving" them of population.
quote: Originally posted by mrmitchell
The plan for Ruhr if we somehow win with 21 Elite Knights left is to rampage through the rest of the region, though, right? |
Depends. I don't think we have a set plan for this.
If we could catch their returning Ansar with their pants down and be on the attack, I think we could do quite well against their 2 defense. But I find it unlikely we'll be in that position; we have 2 moves to their 3, and we'll be moving inside enemy borders with the exception of any land we can take along with conquered cities. I think the best bet may be to calculate when the Ansar will be in striking distance if they go straight home from Micco, and plan to get out before they can attack. Which is probably only a turn or two after the FP falls...
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: I wonder how many people took a great risk and failed and never were heard from again. I bet it's a number a lot bigger than those who succeeded and then went on to be famous for all time. |
None of the men who didn't take a risk were heard from again.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Aidun
|
 |
The Hague, the capital of the civilized world
Nov 2002 time: 06:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by mrmitchell
Great men aren't made by standing behind the wall of fear and uncertainty.
Great men are made by taking risks.
Tell me a great man in history, and I will tell you a man that saw his chance and took it. |
Look at Alexander the Great and make a sidenote that he had superior troops a larger army and a fleet
Look at Caesar when he was a general: he had superior troops, better armor, better strategy.
Look at Charlemagne and acknowlegde that again his army was much bigger.
Look at Henry III, he won by luck because of a bad military leadership of the French at Azincourt.
Look at Charles V, his army was superior to every army in the world save the Ottoman one.
Look at Napoleon, his army was larger and better trained, and he had a new tactic.
Look at Bismarck, he hit when France was at its weakest since Napoleon strengthened it.
Look at Marshal Montgomery and General Eisenhower. The so-called big risk of D-day was made as small as possible by atacking poorly defended beaches. The major Amarican losses wer only because of bad luck with bombings.
Look at the Vietnam War, America lost due to superior guerilla tactics of North-Vietnam's General Giap.
Look at the last war in Iraq. What risk was there? None.
These Men have but one thing in common: they didn't overestimate themselves.
Those who did, Darius, Xerxes, Philip II, Napoleon III, Czar Nicolas II, Hitler, Presidents Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson and Nixon did, like many others they were all defeated.
Aidun
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
Why bother for equal when we can go for the gold?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
mrmitchell
|
|
quote: The point is that we're already equal. |
You don't think GWT's war weariness won't end?
besides, you admitted it yourself, we need our future, not happened yet, GA.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|