 |
| |
|
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999
time: 23:36
|
|
We can either go with 1/4 pt per rush or 1 pt per 10 yds rushing, I think the latter is better. As someone pointed out, 15 rushes with 10 yds shouldn't be worth 7.5 or even 3.75, it should be worth a ride on the bench 
Let's put some suggestions into actual game stats to see if we're asking for trouble:
QB 18-30 1 TD, 1 int, 230 yds =
18pts + 6 - 2 + 4.6 = 26.6
RB 22 rushes for 100 yds, 1 TD, 2 rec for 20 yds =
10 + 6 + 2 + 1 = 19
WR 4 rec for 80 yds, 1 TD = 4 + 6 + 4 = 14
That's with passing 1pt per 50 yds pro-rated, 1pt per 20 yds rec, and 1pt per 10 yds rushing and 1pt per completion and reception.
I think that looks like good balance, some recievers get like 8 catches and 120 yds with multiple TD's and that puts them way up there with an average QB week.
I also think return yds should be 1pt per 20 yds, this makes some of the weaker recievers who run back kicks and punts worth attention. Otherwise it'll be a mad rush for the handful of elite WR's.
Imran - quote:
I'm against individual defensive players. Defensive players individually is very touch-and-go. Since they don't have the ball in their hands, its very spotty what they'll do. You can be relatively sure that a QB or RB or WR will do good or bad against a certain D. However, you have no clue how an individual defender will do.
Last year was the first time I played with Defensive teams, and I LOVED it! I would consider going to back to individual players to be a step back. HUGE step back. |
Defensive players don't need to touch the ball, they'll be touching the guys who do touch the ball. I don't understand that argument. The tendency is to take LB's since they get most of the tackles but DB's who get both tackles and INT's also come into play, especially if they do some kick returning. The line isn't as important but guys who get plenty of sacks are valuable.
What would a league be without us disagreeing on something. Vote on it? 
INT's worth 3 pts?
Fumbles -1
Fumbles lost -2
Fumble rec +3
|
|
| |
|
|
|
Zopperoni
|
|
I don't really care either. Given the choice, I'd lean slightly more towards individual defense, but it's all good.
|
|
| |
|
| |
|
|
|
Berzerker
|
|
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999
time: 23:36
|
|
That's fine with me...
As for the 1 or 0.5 penalty for incomplete passes, I wouldn't mind a 1/2 point too much but a full point would be pretty severe. That's 0 points for going 10-20. And with 1 pt per 50 pass yds, a QB with no TD's could still have a decent day and not get squat in points.
QB 250 yds, 16-32, no TDs = 5 pts if an inc = -1
with an inc = -0.5 that would be 13 pts
WR 4 rec, 60 yds, no TDs =7 pts
WR 4 rec, 60 yds, 1 TD = 13 pts
That still seems weighted a bit too much toward the WR
QB 250 yds, 16-32 = 13 pts
WR 60 yds, 4 rec, 1 TD = 13 pts
Recievers aren't penalised for dropping balls so why penalise QB's, especially when the incomplete pass could have been a dropped ball? On the other hand, we had some pretty big tallies by QB's last year at FFZ, like 60 points for 1 game. So maybe a 1/2 point penalty would bring the passing game down more in line with the rest of the offense.
|
|
| |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36.
Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|
08-07-2004 22:29
.
|