 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:36
|
|
12
Scoring Type: Head-to-Head
Start Scoring on: Week 1
Can't Cut List Provider: Yahoo! Sports
Max Moves: No maximum
Max Trades: No maximum
Trade Reject Time: 1
Trade End Date: November 19, 2004
Trade Review: League Votes
Waiver Time: 2 days
Post Draft Players: Follow Waiver Rules
Playoffs: Week 15 and 16 (4 teams)
Roster Positions: QB, WR, WR, RB, RB, TE, K, DEF, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN, BN
Stat Categories: Completions (1)
Incomplete Passes (-0.5)
Passing Yards (50 yards per point)
Passing Touchdowns (6)
Interceptions (-2)
Rushing Yards (10 yards per point)
Rushing Touchdowns (6)
Receptions (1)
Reception Yards (20 yards per point)
Reception Touchdowns (6)
Return Yards (20 yards per point)
Return Touchdowns (6)
2-Point Conversions (2)
Fumbles Lost (-2)
Offensive Fumble Return TD (6)
Field Goals 0-19 Yards (3)
Field Goals 20-29 Yards (3)
Field Goals 30-39 Yards (3)
Field Goals 40-49 Yards (4)
Field Goals 50+ Yards (5)
Point After Attempt Made (1)
Sack (1)
Interception (2)
Fumble Recovery (2)
Touchdown (6)
Safety (2)
Block Kick (2)
Points Allowed 0 points (10)
Points Allowed 1-6 points (7)
Points Allowed 7-13 points (4)
Points Allowed 14-20 points (1)
Points Allowed 21-27 points (0)
Points Allowed 28-34 points (-1)
Points Allowed 35+ points (-4)
Fractional Points: Yes
Negative Points: Yes
--------------------------------------------------
Looks good to me, I'll give those settings a 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Berzerker
|
 |
topeka, kansas,USA
May 1999 time: 23:36
|
|
Lol, no offense, but might as well go with 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE and 1 RB/WR. If there is a discrepancy in weight we've given the positions, creating more variablility would end up letting people take advantage of that. For example, if WR's are too valuable and someone can mathematically figure that out they can go with 4 WR's while the rest of us are screwing around with the more standard 2 RBs, 2 WRs, TE and an extra RB or WR...
I think the 1 pt per 10 rushing yards will ensure RB's have plenty of value compared to WR's but why let people opt out of TE's? Oh well, I'd rather go with 2 RB, 2WR and a TE than eliminate the requirement for a TE. But I'd also rather go with 2 RB, 2 WR, 1 TE and 1 WR/RB 
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
-Jrabbit
|
 |
of the Electronic Egyptians
Feb 2002 time: 23:36
|
|
Go to the Yahoo site, where the teams are listed in this order:
- Billy's Boingers (Tuberski)
- Sarlat (Kalius)
- Cute Little Bunnies (-Jrabbit)
- Flippin' Monkey Men (Japher)
- Vegas Skullsmashers (Dissident)
- Berzerkers (Berzerker)
- Dallas Dwarf Tossers (SlowwHand)
- Kyrandia Dragonhawks (reismark)
- Ramsey's Razorbacks (gjramsey)
- Fighting Emus (Jac de Molay)
- Amsterdam Afros (Zopperoni)
- Georgia Gliders (Imram Siddiqui)
Have two people generate random number lists (1-12). Preferably, Poly people who don't participate in the league.
Use the first number list to (randomly) re-order this list 1-12.
Use the 2nd number list to assign the draft order. to that re-ordered list.
Obviously, this can be done in a single iteration. The 2nd randomization would be used to minimize people declaring it fixed.
As for me, I don't really care where I pick, as long as I know a couple days in advance so I can feel prepared.
If we're really starting Monday, we need to get it together.
(A list of Poly names alongside team names would also be nice. I made a start, above.)
Last edited by -Jrabbit on 19-07-2004 at 07:58
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|