 |
|
SpencerH
|
 |
Co-Ruler of my patch of land south of Birmingham Alabama
Feb 2002 time: 23:35
|
|
I'd expect that if you want to play the game without lag it'll require a great deal more than that.
I expected that Civ3 would incorporate a tactical screen similar to Shogun. Strangely, its gone the other way. The tactical game has incorporated better and better strategy while CIV3 has remained static (if not gone backward) in terms of tactical play.
EDIT: I couldnt leave that spelling error
Last edited by SpencerH on 21-08-2004 at 20:31
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001 time: 07:35
|
|
Oh my god, I love the graphics. It definitely contributes to the atmosphere when Roman light infantry is thrown fifty meters through air by an elephant.
Screenshots: http://kotisivu.dnainternet.net/anttinor/images/rtw/
Edit: Image #1 was taken at 800x600, no high details shadows, medium unit detail, medium terrain detail. The rest were taken at 1024x768 with everything at maximum (something was at High instead of Very High, I forget what). The top notch settings ran pretty well on my rig, it got a bit sluggish when zooming in. I have a Radeon 9600 (128 MB), 512 megabytes of DDR RAM, and an Athlon XP 2500+ for a processor.
The demo has two battles, the first is a guided one as the Romans against the Gauls, the on-your-own battle is as Hannibal and his coalition against the Romans in the Battle of river Trebia.
The play system is pretty much like Medieval, having played that I was right at home.
Last edited by Kassiopeia on 23-08-2004 at 00:56
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|