 |
|
Caligastia
|
|
Did anyone see Otago get creamed by Canterbury?
The Currie cup game - Blue Bulls v Sharks - was better. It was action packed, but the Sharks had a woeful second half after trailing by one point at the break.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Tamerlin
No, I am only looking at Rugby these days. |
You mean crap rugby? The way Toulouse is playing it? 
quote: I had plenty of ideas about a new name for our thread... |
How about? Rugby - How Appropriate That Toulouse Sounds A Bit Like To Lose!

quote: Reading the text of his press conference it seems VERY likely he knew.
The essence was "no rift with Clive, great respect for him, will succeed in all he does *wherever that might be*"
Didn't ring any alarms at the time but looking back... |
Yup. That's what I reckon. The latest reports seem to be a little more vague. That Clive hasn't yet handed in his resignation. I can't imagine any backing down at this stage. And I liked John Connolly's comment re Clive's s***** coaching aspirations: "It's someone with their ego out of control".
Oh, and just for the record, because I know none of us are ashamed of the amount of time we spend nattering about rugby, up until the commencement of this thread, including our wee temporary version of this thread, we have, between us, posted
10, 356
times since we started our dedicated rugby threads!

|
|
|  |
 |
|
ravagon
|
|
Australia
Sep 1999 time: 13:36
|
|
Mmm. Harkening back to some of the Dally/Clive comments, some of them come as a bit of a surprise:-
[D] I'm unsure whether we have the right structure to allow our players to be successful,"
"The World Cup was a little bit of a one-off."
"Playing internationals while trying to run a domestic competition and the way the season runs until May before some players then have to go on tour are not conducive to career longevity.
I'm not so sure what he's talking about with the structure comment. It seemed to be very successful in the short term but it was never going to be possible to sustain it over a longer period. As I see it they threw a large quantity of cash at it, kept their multi-million-dollar team together for much of the domestic season, club commitments regardless, and worked up (successfully as it turned out) to their WC goal. It wasn't so much a one-off as the end result of a long and fairly well-planned campaign, and, seen as such (ie: the end) it was very successful. I'm not sure they have enough time left to do the same thing again in time for 2007 but, given the same funding, they could certainly begin planning for 2011.
Dally's entirely correct about the domestic/international competition bit, but then that's the same dilemma facing every nation.
[C] "I love football and I go to as many games as I possibly can. I never had that passion for rugby I have for football. I never got into rugby in the same way."
"I was forced into playing rugby, because that's the only game the school played. And I hated it. I ran away a couple of times because of football. I didn't mind being at boarding school. I just hated not playing football."
Burning bridges with a 25Mton thermonuke?
That or he may well be in line for a 'relaxing stress-relief vacation' at a psy..,er, 'secluded resort', after which he'll be back as the national coach with a new 'found' enthusiasm? 
That aside though, he's saying all of the right things to get into the soccer world, although I doubt he'd rise to the same heights. He may be taken on as an assistant coach I suppose, with regard to some of his coaching 'techniques', but just how useful would he be?
The soccer world already has more than its fair share of ex-players/coaches without looking to other sports.
When Michael J. went to baseball he did serve for a season as a passable player but was never able to rise to anywhere near the same heights and he was regarded as one of those 'once-in-a-generation' athletes.
Oh and can I say that I'm honoured to have the 10361st post? 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by ravagon
Oh and can I say that I'm honoured to have the 10361st post? |
Kiwi arithmetic, huh? 
While I'm sure Clive genuinely believes everything he's saying about those organisational problems - who in their right mind would disagree? - I think it's all a bit of a smokescreen. He wants out. He knows it's not going to get any better than the WRC win, at least not for quite a while, with pain along the way, and I don't think he's prepared to hack it.
Equally, he's a person whose ego makes him an easy person to dislike. Or even hate. You can be damn sure that, whenever he trips across to s*****, if he does, there will be a poultice of people doing their damndest to stop him getting wherever he wants to go. He, of course, would be blind to that. People with egos such as his usually are.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
It is all getting very confusing. The BBC is now reporting this:
Woodward is thought to want to remain in charge for the Autumn internationals against Canada, South Africa and Australia and then hand over the reins to his successor in time for the 2005 Six Nations.
His early exit would allow him to concentrate on next summer's Lions tour to New Zealand, which he has been asked to oversee, before completing a switch to football.
But even that chain of events is in doubt after Lions chief executive John Feehan told the London Evening Standard: "If something came up which interfered with (his) ability to do his job with the Lions properly, we would have to consider it.
"Clive's preparation has been second to none to date and we are very happy with what he has put in place. The only thing which could affect his position is if he accepted another position which took up the bulk of his time." |
It's all getting very bizarre. First, he was reported, leaving the meeting, saying he was quitting. Next, he said he hadn't quit, and that his lawyers were talking to the RFU. I wonder if it was a fiscal/legal thing. If he quit, breaking his contract, his pay out was less. Therfore he couldn't be seen to be quitting. Therefore he retracted his earlier position.
After everything that he's said, I can't imagine the Union wanting him coaching again. Can you?
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
I cannot imagine why I didn’t shout about it earlier. Except I perhaps didn’t think you needed another stick to beat me with? |
Yeah, typical, tell me when it's too late! Although retrospective beating-with-big-sticks can be more perverse, hence more fun ...
quote: At times one has to like Eddie. |
Mmmm. A tough task-master is our Eddie, it's turning out. Roger Gould found the going a bit tough, too, apparently.
quote: If Clive takes a job in soccer before the Lions tour expect to hear of his sacking as coach for that (the Irish coach would then step in as Clive pipped him to selection). |
Fingers crossed he takes a s***** job. I'm sick of the sight of him. I can't imagine he has too much rugby-supporter sympathy over there? I heard one of his mates on the Rugby board singing his praises. Is anyone else?
quote: I don’t think he is the all rounder and management man needed in a head coach. |
They were Clive's strengths, presumably. I was never immensely impressed with his tactical nouse. He was so very very lucky he had J**** around. Presumably Robinson will have the job until he proves he's not up to it? Or is he known to be filling in? I wonder what the "success" criteria will be if the going is tough in November.
Actually, one good thing to come out of this - well, two, because, for me, Clive nicking off is an early Christmas present - will be to see what approach is now taken with the team. Will youth get a go? Will the pain of some losses be worn in the interests of long term gain?
quote: Interesting talk on Sky’s Rugby club last night – ignoring the silly praise of Clive and Dally winning the RWC (we all know who really drove that success and he only got mentioned a few times) |
Why is that? Why do so many people like to ignore that J**** carried them to the World Cup on his back?
quote: the pundits seemed to think Dean Richards was the only pedigree candidate – but the bookies have him at 33/1. |
Deano can't be out of the equation. He probably stayed where he was one season too long, but his history says he's probably the best available? Or will his one-season-too-many work against him?
quote: So of the top eight sides in the world Eddie is second longest serving coach – second only to Monsieur Laporte. Hard to believe it is less than a year since the RWC and England are effectively in absolute turmoil. You SH lads must be loving it. |
I think it's the best thing that's happened to English rugby. Probably, to be honest, since Clive turned up in the first place. I'm sure he brought something to the structure and management of the group. Right man at the right time. They were the best team in the world for a period thanks to mainly solid players, one superstar and one megastar. And he marshalled them. With the megastar the one who was really running the playing show, I suspect that any number of people could have coached the team to the trophy, but that's beside the point. Problem was, he took over a team on the way up. But there was next to no evidence that he had the judgement or temperament to do the really hard job - starting if not from square one, from about square two or three. I never liked him. But his ludicrous behaviour recently is absolutely indicative of what I never liked about him. It surprises me not one jot. Anyway, in summary, providing you find the right replacement, English rugby will be immensely better off in the longer term.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
LDiCesare
|
|
La Ferté sous Jouarre France
Jan 2001 time: 05:36
|
|
Be honest; It is, the first time. It probably gets on your nerves the thousand and thirty seventh time, though.
The fact that Beziers (which bet Toulouse) has just been beaten by Castres doesn't bode well for Toulouse, does it? Actually, it seemsBeziers has a good team this year.
On the other hand, Biarritz is doing well and the Stade Francais is not. So things would be worse.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
finbar
|
 |
Castiglion Fiorentino, Italy
Jan 1970 time: 06:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Havak
He didn’t look happy. In fact most of the time he was looking very unhappy as he questioned Mr Pearsons latest ‘homer’ decision. |
That's something I've missed - J****'s furious scowl and muttering and head shaking as he tramps away from the ref. 
quote: Oh yes – in Jan/Feb it can be like playing on concrete. I wonder how he will cope with slushy sodden paddocks though. |
He will cope. In the sense that he's played enough rugby in Kiwi winters for it not to be unfamiliar. Speed becomes fairly meaningless and ball handling skill takes over, which is the real test. In fact, the East Midlands in winter is probably tropical compared to Otago in winter.
quote: Fourth franchise surely? Although I do take your point. |
Yes, fourth, sorry. Interesting article in the paper this morning about the extra franchise. One of the arguments put in its favour is that the new franchise will add to our Wallaby depth by offering opportunity for those players who might otherwise go overseas. But, when pressed on how many players currently overseas he wishes were here and available, Eddie could name only one - T. Kefu. The point being that, as I've said before, the players who nick off overseas are either (a) not Wallaby material, therefore simply seeking a better pay day; or (b) retired Wallabies seeking superannuation. So the depth argument - in terms of retaining players - is fallacious. Someone who muddies the argument somewhat is a player like Manny Edmonds. He quit the Waratahs for Perpignan because he couldn't command a regular Waratahs' spot. Because he was inconsistent. A blinder one week, unseen the next. It's arguable, perhaps, that his time with Perpignan could have made him a more consistent player. OTOH, we're not short of halves.
Of greater concern, I think, is the talk of manning the extra franchise by relaxing the rule relating to S12 players having to be Wallaby-eligible. In other words, signing up the cream of the Pacific Islanders for the new franchise. The ARU hasn't ruled out the possibility. The article theorises that the ARU might keep the option up its sleeve, waiting to see how well they can man the franchise under the existing rule. If they decide the franchise isn't strong enough, the rule could be changed to allow in, for example, the Pacific Islanders. All of which renders the argument about creating Wallaby depth completely fallacious.
One real benefit of an extra franchise would be to help develop the careers of players like Matt Henjak. There's no doubt he will replace George Gregan when he retires. But, currently, he warms the bench for the Brumbies, watching Gregan doing this thing. Playing as #1 scrum half would undoubtedly develop his game. And there are several other young players in a similar situation.
The other potential benefit of an extra franchise, of course, is taking rugby to more people, increasing its exposure. Which has to be a good thing for the game. Providing, of course, the franchise is set up properly and isn't a lemon.
So there are arguments for and against. While there's no doubt the decision is money-driven, there is at least some potential to help the Wallaby cause.
quote: Saving grace of the opening round – Wasps lost to Saracens. I nearly laughed. Actually I did laugh! |
I saw that. And p*ssed myself laughing! 
Oh, and I saw a very interesting documentary series the other night about the history and travails and journeys of the Cimbrians. A couple of them looked like they could tackle. You should point A. Robinson in their direction.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|