 |
|  |
 |
|
gnome
|
 |
New Port Richey, FL
Nov 1999 time: 00:35
|
|
Maybe I'm just feeling pedantic today... it is old news that Firaxis is apparently abandoning Civ3 Conquests from further patching, leaving it with game-crippling bugs.
If I were truly ready to abandon Firaxis, I would argue for never buying another of their games again. But one of the things that makes the current situation so frustrating, is that we know Firaxis is capable of giving us what we want. Everything on our top 5 list of issues, so to speak, they actually got right at one phase of the game.
Firaxis seems to think that they do not need to fix up Civ3--they are assuming that their new projects are more important. I believe that we the fans, without rudness or complete abandonment, need to make it clear that ongoing support of previously released games is essential. Since Firaxis seems to be making it as a financial decision, we need to make a financial point to them.
Pursuant to that, I propose the following pledge:
I do not agree with Firaxis dropping patch support for Civ3 and until they revise that decision I pledge not to purchase another Firaxis game at full price.
Let's all wait for their new games to hit the bargain bin before we give them any more of our money. It's not financially justified to do otherwise, if they are released incomplete and abandoned with major problems remaining.
I'll keep a list of usernames here:
Gnome
Antrine
Tattila the Hun
Cataphract887
OzzyKP
Kingof the Apes
Niessuh
Switch
Mad Bomber
Anyone who agrees with me and wants on the list, follow up with a post that says "Put me on the list"... I welcome discussion of how this pledge could be re-worded to greater effect, or any words of wisdom that will knock me off this rant and get me to calm down 
Last edited by gnome on 30-09-2004 at 04:02
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Antrine
|
|
Well gnome, you are expressing much of my sentiment, much of my feelings on this issue. To wit; I waited until Conquests to buy CIVIII, simply because of the 'editor' issue. CIVII editor spoiled my thinking/playing on what 'should' be available in a game.
Now, unless CIV4 sports a deluxe go get em, wondrous all encompassing, can't live without 'game editor'; that is also, easy to use (easier) and access to random event or AI sub-routines then I AM out of supporting Firaxis, except to bug them to 'release the Conquest code' to someone, anyone caring competent and prone to timely action.
So you have my vote!
One more year? Of limping along with Conquests, until we even know if CIV4 is smelling like a 'rat'? Gosh, at this rate, my Mod (unfortunately) is still in the running for being this Christmas' smash hit or next years wonder. And that is pathetic, not because my Mod is less than wonderful, but because a 'nobody' fan is competing with the 'big boys' just because of a too long lasting incompetence. Now that stinks!
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Antrine
|
|
Well, you are on the front-lines then with this one (along with others I know), no problem though, it ain't the money with me anyway. It is having something beautiful that 'works'! I had patience, will have patience, besides I have 'payoffs'; modding. And within the next year I anticipate new wonders to hit the market. If not, you have a front-line seat ticket for the upcoming wonder (my mod), now with working title; 'how to mod to the top of the game designers' heap', or sub-titled, 'how to gain glory through Alice's Looking Glass as a back door'. Catchy eh,?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
eris
|
|
You know, I understand the problems some advanced players have with this game. I have run into frustrations even at my meagre playing level. I understand the advanced fan base and its analyses and feedback that have helped polish this game and make it even better. But sometimes the rhetoric sounds like I should feel guilty for enjoying the game at all, or at least go get "idiot" tatooed on my forehead. This is especially true when it comes down to "Do this or else" type rhetoric. Personally, being just as contrary-minded as many others I have observered here, whenever I am faced with a "Do this or else" converstation, my instict always leaps towards the "or else". Then again, maybe Firaxis/Atari is less intolerant of veiled threats. Then again, maybe that's the only way to get their attention. Maybe.
As for me, as I think about it, I think I need to go find a tatoo shop. After all, I'm still having fun. What's wrong with me?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gnome
|
 |
New Port Richey, FL
Nov 1999 time: 00:35
|
|
quote: Originally posted by eris
You know, I understand the problems some advanced players have with this game. I have run into frustrations even at my meagre playing level. I understand the advanced fan base and its analyses and feedback that have helped polish this game and make it even better. But sometimes the rhetoric sounds like I should feel guilty for enjoying the game at all, or at least go get "idiot" tatooed on my forehead. This is especially true when it comes down to "Do this or else" type rhetoric. Personally, being just as contrary-minded as many others I have observered here, whenever I am faced with a "Do this or else" converstation, my instict always leaps towards the "or else". Then again, maybe Firaxis/Atari is less intolerant of veiled threats. Then again, maybe that's the only way to get their attention. Maybe.
As for me, as I think about it, I think I need to go find a tatoo shop. After all, I'm still having fun. What's wrong with me? |
Nothing. Don't get me wrong, I still enjoy the game. Going through another phase of addiction now with a "flavor mod" I got from CivFanatics.
I just don't see myself paying full retail price for the next installment.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Antrine
|
|
gnome what do think of Firaxis having to go 3-D with CIV4? As a 'rumor' supports, the 3-D will come from 'Pirates' model. Is that game any good? Is it turn based 3-D? How is that workable. I wonder, is 3-D and board games even ideas that can work one platform conceptually? Why do I have a sinking feeling about all this, it seems to me that turn base games are two-dimensional, you know converted board games, and this is just part and parcel of its culture and appeal.
Any thoughts other than morbid?
Sincerely
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Sir Ralph
|
 |
Long live teh Schwampel!
Dec 2001 time: 06:35
|
|
Although this pledge is fundamentally valid, it's kind of lame nonetheless. So you collected what, a dozen votes? Or less? Face the sad fact, hardcore fans, although the lions share of posters of this and other related boards, make less than a percent of game buyers. The significantly bigger part consists of customers like this:
Kid: Oh thanks mum, a cool new game.
Mom: Blessed be the Lord, I don't have to care about this kid for the next two weeks, and that for a mere $40, how convenient.
Hardcore fans can be safely ignored in terms of sales statistics, and that's what counts. They may be a good source for feedback (if the company cares for QA at all) and welcome as cheap beta testers (pre and post release), but that's about it. Even if all of them boycott the next release (which most of them won't anyway, because they are ... well ... hardcore), good grief, new fans will emerge and step in the footprints of the old ones. And if they won't, no worries. The lions share of people that buy the game, will play it for a mere 2 weeks anyway and then abandon it, quality or not, so why waste resources on QA. And if the name of the company is finally in the dirt, we can just disband it and found a new one. Or buy a new, well known brand name, from a company that spent too much on expensive QA and went poof this way. Been there, seen that. Many times. People are so easy to fool.
Calls for boycotts are pointless and won't hurt the company. They will hurt yourself only. If I decide not to buy Civ4, it is not because I want to punish Firaxis, but because the predecessor generated enough displeasure in me to count it generally not worth to devote tons of my valuable spare time for an eventual successor, written by same company. This does not hurt me, as there are enough other games on the market from companies, that actually care for QA. I will however buy Civ4, if I see good reviews by people I trust and know to be critical minds, no matter the price.
Last edited by Sir Ralph on 17-09-2004 at 13:52
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:35. Apolyton Time is 00:35. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|