 |
|  |
 |
|
Vlad Antlerkov
|
 |
Do you have Matt Stairs in your house?
Mar 1999 time: 23:36
|
|
FWIW, American Research Group did a poll (the second one down) in the same timeframe as the Time and Zogby polls, also covering likely voters, getting Bush 48-47. With Nader added in, it becomes Bush 47, Kerry 47, Nader 3. Those three polls (Time, Zogby, ARG) are the only post-convention polls I'm aware of at this writing.
From that same site, some other data from that same Zogby poll:
quote:
Do you think George W. Bush deserves to be reelected as president of the United States, or is it time for someone new?
Deserves Reelection- 46%
Someone New- 48% |
Also from pollingreport.com, a chart with Bush/Kerry/Nader data from the last poll from each major polling outfit. Enjoy. No Libertarians were harmed in the making of this graphic.
Attachment: septgenl.gif
This has been downloaded 122 time(s).
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Shi Huangdi
|
 |
Pittsburgh, PA
Apr 1999 time: 00:36
|
|
I have to say, I am extremely impressed by this. I had figured that there was such incredible polarized neither candidate would ever build up a double digit lead. Give credit to Team Bush; after defeating an incumbent VP after 8 years of Peace and prosperity, they seem to have a good shot now of re-electing a President who started a war and lost over a million jobs.
The combination of Swift Vets for Truth and the GOP convention in the month of August really hit Kerry hard, and Team Kerry has been thrown seriously off balance. The Kerry campaign had hoped that the race would simply be a referendum on Bush, and all they needed was to present a credible alternative. It now seems the Bush campaign has succeeded in turning this from a referendum on the President to a real person v. person comparison. The Bush campaign also felt the Gore campaign in 2000 made it's biggest mistake when it allowed Bush to define himself when introducing himself to the American people. The Bush campaign with it's hard, early, offensive has prevented Kerry from doing that and has soured the campaign early.
I expect Team Kerry, and John Kerry himself, must be fuming over these results and these relentless attacks. Expect them to hit back hard with negative advertisements. The gloves are off, and this can be expected to be the most nasty, most brutal, most partisan, most negative campaign in history. That will favor Bush as well, as it may depress turnout-- with the exception of Republicans, who studies have shown respond the most favorably to attack ads and get energized the most.
But whoever wins, it seems quite clear we will be polarized and devided like never before, and whoever wins will preside over a country half of whom hates them, and maybe their supporters as well. Nasty times seem ahead of us.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Jaguar
|
 |
Montgomery County, MD
Apr 2000 time: 00:36
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Ned
Just looking at history, Nixon won a huge landslide against the very liberal McGovern. Reagan won big against Carter and bigger against his liberal VP, Mondale. Bush I lost to Clinton, but that was because Perot siphoned Bush's vote. Bush II beat Gore, but that was because Nader siphoned Gore's vote.
But now we have another liberal running who knows that being identified as a liberal is a loser and who is trying to remake himself into a conservative. But the Swiftboat ads and the Republican convention stripped Kerry of any right to claim himself to be a conservative.
At this point, I think we may be facing a repeat of Nixon's and Reagan's re-election landslides. America does not elect liberals -- at least, knowingly. |
Are you completely insane? Are you completely unaware of what's going on in the world? Or are you just so delusional that you no longer have any grip on reality? Have your eyes failed you, or have you failed your eyes?
Reagan won 49 states in his re-election bid. Bush would be lucky to win 39, and I wouldn't be surprised if he won by a paper-thin EC margin of less than 20 votes. To win as many states as Reagan did, he'll have to pick up states like Connecticut, California, Maryland, Delaware, and New York. And Bush is no Ronald Reagan.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:36. Apolyton Time is 00:36. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|