 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
lord of the mark
|
 |
FUKCOV - Former United Kingdom Colony of Virginia
Dec 2000 time: 00:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by chegitz guevara
We had massive corruption in our government from the end of the Civil War until roughly the turn of the century. We didn't get rid of it be contracting the rights of the people. We fought to create a more honest government. |
But in 1865 we already had 30+ years experience of democracy, and before that 70 years of a quasidemocratic liberal republic, and before that generations of the rule of law going back to 1688, and before that a tradition of common law and limits on the sovereign going far back in the english political tradition.
The Russians had centuries of backwards absolutism, then a century of modernizing tsarist absolutism, then a couple of years (1905-1914) of tsarism with very modest parliamentary institutions, than a few months of a transitional democratic republic, then Bolshevism, and then a few years of chaotic transition under Yeltsin
civ 2 is actually very good on this - if youve been going steadily from monarchy to republic to democracy, by the time you get to demo youve probably got the improvements and wonders to make demo work. If you go from a long stretch of fundie or commie to demo, theres a good chance you dont have those, and the transition is more challenging (assuming the casual players the game was designed for, not the super players here whove got everything figured out)
|
|
|  |
 |
|
VetLegion
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Serb
One more thing, this new mechanism means deal between the region and federation- the head of state offers pool of candidates and local parliament of the region choose one of the candidates. Is it so undemocratic? |
YES.
Very undemocratic. Thank you.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by VetLegion
YES.
Very undemocratic. Thank you. |
Then where have you been so long?
1) We already had this system for governors in 1993-1994.
2) We have absolutely the same system for election of PM. The head of state offers his candidate for prime minister and our parliament approve or doesn't approve this candidate. Now Putin offers ABSOLUTELY the same scheme for governors.
3) This scheme DOESN'T contradict with our constitution.
4) The citizens of the brightest example of democracy, the last hope of human kind, the US of A of course, do not have "non of the above" option when they vote and do not elect their presidents directly. Does it mean US of A isn't democracy?
5) Why the hell every democracy should be identical?
Last edited by Serb on 16-09-2004 at 07:11
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:23
|
|
quote: Originally posted by Heresson
It is pretty strange, then. Because if it is needed to fight terrorism, I guess it should be done at once. If the old gouvernors can stay, I guess they don't trouble Putin in the case of war against terrorism, and yet He says the changes are needed to fight terrorism....
|
1) He thought about this reform before 9/3, I'm sure.
2) Since this new law doesn't exist yet, it's only an offer so far, I can't say for sure, but I suspect this new law will contain a mechanism for withdrawal of governors (it's something that we lack now). So governors will be way more controllable now, but it's only my guess.
quote: Personally, I don't think that anti-democratic aspect of this reform is the most iimportant one. This reform centralises the state and gives even more power in hands of the head of the state. It will strenghten Russia as a whole. |
And of course it scares you to death, right?
quote: Putin can still be interested personally in a strong power of president after ceasing to be a president: taken into account his popularity, He won't have problems with puting some his man on the sit. |
I don't see any problem with that.
quote:
Go democracy!
 |
Don't worry. If will go, we'll take you with us. We are brothers, as you say and relatives should be kept close.
Last edited by Serb on 16-09-2004 at 07:38
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Serb
|
|
Siberia, Communist party of Apolyton
Nov 2001 time: 11:23
|
|
And who said he is dictator for life?
He will left the office in 2008.
|
|
|  |
 |
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:23. Apolyton Time is 00:23. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|