 |
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:22
|
|
Generals are rather powerful aren't they. It's awesome how the battle between even numbers can hang on the general. I have this uber general who's also the faction leader. Man, nothing can stand in his way, he's pratically a one man army all by himself.
What do others think about the general side of things?
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:22
|
|
Yeah I try to keep my general out of the hard brute fighting. I mainly have the cav to flank the enemy which quickly devastates them. Usually just flanking them and charging home with the General is enough to turn the gauls into a rout at least. Then you just pursue and destroy at your own pleasure.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Arnelos
|
 |
of the Free World
Sep 2002 time: 00:22
|
|
I've been WAY too busy playing Rome: Total War to read this thread in several days. 
Now that I see it, I'll see what I can do about screenshots.
I've been playing as the Brutii. It's now 223 BC and I've conquered all of Greece, Macedonia, Thrace, northern Italy, and modern France. I just got the message a few turns back that I could attack Rome and become Imperator, but I'm putting that off for now.
I've had so many really cool battles, but I'll say this about a recent battle I fought with the Gauls:
Onagers+Archers both using fire shot kick serious a--!!!
I just show up at a Gaulic village with a ton of swordsmen inside (they seem to build little else) and pummel the snot out of it with onagers and tons of archers using either normal shot or fire shot (depending on the situation). Once that bombardment has killed at least 2/3 of the enemy's swordsmen, I break the gate down easily with ballistae and move in with legionaries and cavalry to finish the place off (having told the archers and onagers to cease fire except in limited cases, of course).
This generally leads to battles where I'll kill 500+ Gauls and lose 10-15 Romans at most. 
What can I say? Artillery rocks. 
As for field battles, highly trained archers are INCREDIBLY DEADLY against enemy infantry. All of the enemies I've faced so far (Greeks, Macedonians, Thracians, Gauls) seem to use very little cavalry and relatively few archers (other than the Thracians, against which I used cavalry for that reason).
I can send in an army of well-trained archers covered by a few legionary units and decimate an entire army of the enemy just with archer fire. Cavalry Auxilia (horse archers) are even more effective, especially with the Cantabrian Circle special ability. Most enemy swordsmen/spearmen don't stand a chance being torn apart from long range like that.
I think such a strategy won't work as well against the Britons or the Eastern factions because they have more cavalry and chariots at their disposal.
Last edited by Arnelos on 29-09-2004 at 05:59
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Flip McWho
|
|
New Zealand
May 2002 time: 17:22
|
|
I thought it was if you completed the campaign you unlocked all of the rest.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Kassiopeia
|
 |
Jyväskylä, Finland
Jul 2001 time: 07:22
|
|
You can *either* complete the entire campaign *or* crush the faction in the campaign. Both work.
quote: I've been playing as the Brutii. It's now 223 BC and I've conquered all of Greece, Macedonia, Thrace, northern Italy, and modern France. I just got the message a few turns back that I could attack Rome and become Imperator, but I'm putting that off for now. |
I wonder if I just suck or if I'm being too careful, as the Julii I have only southern France, Corinth, Sparta, Segesta, Cirta and Carthage, and that little one on Corsica. This in 220 BC. Playing medium diff here btw.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:22. Apolyton Time is 00:22. |
top of page
|
|
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|