 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|  |
 |
|
Wazell
|
 |
Fine Land
May 2000 time: 07:13
|
|
Hmm, no one here has stated the obvious: MarkG was back then posting from a Guest account and not yet registered. Since everyone seems to ignore Guest posts automatically, you'll have those ignored even when you're logged out. Why he wasn't registered in first place is another matter.
Anyway, back on topic. I liked Anno1602, although it's a bit simple. Hope that 1503 is better. I hear 1602 was originally targeted to German market as a half-price game, which in no doubt explains a lot of simplicity.
But Settlers series should not ever be in any worst game discussion IMHO. Maybe this recalls back to the days of S1, which I played through countless long nights. S2 was excellent too, but it had its own issues and could have had more or better chosen new stuff. Good and compact campaign though. Then again, S3 is very good in its own right, but it loses some Settlers feeling, when concentrating to war-related concepts and removing some of its prequels' careful empire building and resource management. Thus I quickly lost interest in S3 expansion packs and didn't bother with S4 at all (except for the demo, which is actually kinda cool). Haven't really looked their new projects, but of course anything Settlers-related from Bluebyte is always positive. 
|
|
|  |
 |
|
gopher
|
|
I eat my own poop
Dec 1999 time: 00:13
|
|
Bump for a damn good thread!
And, original CTP sucked butt
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Comrade Tassadar
|
|
Hmm...........................................................................................................................
Civ1.
|
|
|  |
 |
|
Space05us
|
|
settlers 2, Im sure the other games in that series suck just as bad.
|
|
|  |
All times are GMT. The time now is 05:13. Apolyton Time is 00:13. |
top of page
|
| archivepost |
|
Forum Rules:
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is ON
vB code is ON
Smilies are ON
[IMG] code is ON
|
|
|
|
|
|